Implementation of a Diabetes Self-management Education Program in Primary Care for Adults Using Shared Medical Appointments

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to implement diabetes self-management education in primary care using the Chronic Care Model and shared medical appointments (SMA) to provide evidence-based interventions to improve process and measure outcomes.

Methods

A quality improvement project using the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle was implemented in a primarycare setting in South Texas to provide diabetes self-management education for adults. Biological measures were evaluated in 70 patients at initiation of the project and thereafter based on current practice guidelines.

Results

The results of the project were consistent with the literature regarding the benefits, sustainability, and viability of SMA. As compared with that in studies presented in the literature, the patient population who participated in SMA had similar outcomes regarding improvement in A1C, self-management skills, and satisfaction. SMA are an innovative system redesign concept with the potential to provide comprehensive and coordinated care for patients with multiple and chronic health conditions while still being an efficient, effective, financially viable, and sustainable program.

Conclusions

As the incidence and prevalence of diabetes increase, innovative models of care can meet the growing demand for access and utilization of diabetes self-management education programs. Programs focusing on chronic conditions to improve outcomes can be replicated by health care providers in primary care settings. SMA can increase revenue and productivity, improve disease management, and increase provider and patient satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007 2008:

Huang ES

Basu A

O’Grady M

Capretta JC

.Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S..Diabetes Care. 2009;32 (12): 2225-2229

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number of people with diabetes increase to 24 million: estimates of diagnosed diabetes now available for all US counties. http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2008/r080624.htm. Published 2008. Accessed November 22, 2008.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing chronic diseases: investing wisely in health. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/factsheets/Prevention/pdf/tobacco.pdf. Published 2008. Accessed October 19, 2008. http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/factsheets/Prevention/pdf/diabetes.pdf

Ayoub WT

Newman ED

Blosky MA

Stewart WF

Wood GC

.Improving detection and treatment of osteporosis: redesigning care using the electronic medical record and shared medical appointments.Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:37-42

Thacker HL

Maxwell R

Saporito J

Bronson D

.Shared medical appointments: facilitating interdisciplinary care for midlife women.J Womens Health. 2005;14 (9): 867-870

Kirsh SR

Aron DC

.Integrating the chronic-care model and the ACGME competencies: using shared medical appointments to focus on systems-based practice.Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17 (1): 15-19

Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000:

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Percentage of preventive care practices for adults aged > 18 years with diabetes, United States, 2007. http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/preventive/fAllPractices.htm. Published 2009. Accessed March 29, 2010.

10.

Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2009.Diabetes Care. 2009;32 (suppl 1): S20-S61

11.

Wagner EH

Austin BT

Von Korff M

.Organizing care for patients with chronic illness.Milbank Q. 1996;74 (4): 511-544

12.

Larsen PD

Chronic Illness: Impact and Intervention. 7th ed.

Larsen PD

Lubkin IM

, ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2009:462-464.

13.

Bodenheimer T

Berry-Millett R

.Follow the money: controlling expenditures by improving care for patients needing costly services.New Engl J Med. 2009;361 (16): 1521-1523

14.

Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2010.Diabetes Care. 2010;32 (suppl 1): S26

15.

Jaber R

Braksmajer A

Trilling JS

.Group visits: a qualitative review of current research.J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19 (3): 276-290

16.

Bronson D

Maxwell R

.Shared medical appointments: increasing patient access without increasing physician hours.Cleve Clin J Med. 2004;71 (5): 369-377

17.

TheobaldMMasleyS. A guide to group visits for chronic conditions affected by overweight and obesity. http://www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/aafp_org/documents/clinical/pub_health/aim/groupvisits.Par.0001.File.dat/GroupVisitAIM.pdf. Accessed September 7, 2009.

18.

Chin MH

Cook S

Drum ML

, et al.Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with the health disparities collaborative.Diabetes Care. 2004;27 (1): 2-8

19.

Langford AT

Sawyer DR

Gioimo S

Brownson CA

O’Toole ML

.Patient-centered goal setting as a tool to improve diabetes self-management.Diabetes Educ. 2007;33 (suppl 6): 139S-144S

20.

JaberRBraksmajerATrillingJS. Group visits for chronic illness care: models, benefits, and challenges. Family Practice Medicine. http://www.aafp.org/fpm/20060100/37grou.html. Published 2006.

21.

Davies MJ

Heller S

Skinner TC

, et al.Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) program for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomized controlled trial.BMJ. 2008;336:491-495

22.

Group Health Resource Institute. Improving chronic illness care. http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=The_Chronic_Care_Model&s=2. Published 2009. Accessed December 1, 2009.

23.

Davis AM

Sawyer DR

Vinci LM

.The potential of group visits in diabetes care.Clin Diabetes. 2008;26 (2): 58-62

24.

Kirsh SR

Lawrence RH

Aron DC

.Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: a case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes.Implement Sci. 2008;3 (34): 1-15

25.

Kirsh SR

Schaub K

Aron DC

.Shared medical appointments: a potential venue for education in interprofessional care.Qual Manag Health Care. 2009;18 (3): 217-224

26.

Schneider ME

.Group visits can enhance diabetes treatment.Clin Endocrinol News. 2010;5 (1): 26

27.

Taveira TH

Friedmann PD

Cohn LB

, et al.Pharmacist-led group medical appointment model in type 2 diabetes.Diabetes Educ. 2010;36 (1): 109-117

28.

Weinger K

.Group medical appointments in diabetes care: Is there a future?.Diabetes Spectr. 2003;16 (2): 104-107

29.

Newhouse RP

Pettit JC

.The slippery slope: differentiating between quality improvement and research.J Nurs Adm. 2006;36 (4): 211-219

30.

Texas Diabetes Council. Diabetes toolkit. 5th ed.http://www.tdctoolkit.org/download_a_tool_kit.asp. Published 2009. Accessed September 1, 2009.

31.

Bupert C

The Primary Care Provider’s Guide to Compensation and Quality: How to Get Paid and Not Get Sued. 2nd ed.Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2005:

32.

National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS survey vendor certification. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/170/Default.aspx. Published 2010. Accessed February 3, 2010.

33.

National Committee for Quality Assurance. What is HEDIS? HEDIS and quality compass. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/187/Default.aspx. Published 2010. Accessed February 3, 2010.

34.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Innovations exchange. http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=1890. Published 2009. Accessed September 28, 2009.