Integration and Utilization of Peer Leaders for Diabetes Self-Management Support: Results From Project SEED (Support,Education,and Evaluation in Diabetes)

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a peer leader-led (PL) diabetes self-management support (DSMS) group in achieving and maintaining improvements in A1C, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and diabetes distress in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes self-management support is critical; however, effective, sustainable support models are scarce.

Methods

The study was a cluster randomized controlled trial of 221 people with diabetes from 6 primary care practices. Practices and eligible participants (mean age: 63.0 years, 63.8% female, 96.8% white, 28.5% at or below poverty level, 32.5% using insulin, A1C ≥7%: 54.2%) were randomized to diabetes self-management education (DSME) + PL DSMS (n = 119) or to enhanced usual care (EUC) (DSME + traditional DSMS with no PL; n = 102). Data were collected at baseline, after DSME (6 weeks), after DSMS (6 months), and after telephonic DSMS (12 months).

Results

Decreases in A1C occurred between baseline and post-DSME in both groups. Both groups sustained improvements during DSMS, but A1C levels increased during telephonic DSMS. Improvements in self-monitoring of blood glucose were observed in both groups following DSME and were sustained throughout. At study end, the intervention group was 4.3 times less likely to have diabetes regimen–related distress compared to EUC.

Conclusions

PL DSMS is as effective as traditional DSMS in helping participants to maintain glycemic control and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and more effective at improving distress. With increasing diabetes prevalence and shortage of diabetes educators, it is important to integrate and use low-cost interventions in high-risk communities that build on available resources.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

O’Connor

Wellenius

. Rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of diabetes and coronary heart disease. Public Health. 2012;126(10):813-820.

Norris

Engelgau

Narayan

KMV

. Effectiveness of self management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561-587.

Norris

Lau

Smith

Schmid

Engelgau

. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1159-1171.

Norris

Nichols

Caspersen

et al . Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4)(suppl):39-66.

Padgett

Mumford

Hynes

Carter

. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychosocial intervention on management of diabetes mellitus. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):1007-1030.

Lasater

Becker

Hill

Gans

. Synthesis of findings and issues from religious-based cardiovascular disease prevention trials. Ann Epidemiol. 1997;S7:S46-S53.

Beck

Greenwood

Blanton

et al . 2017 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(5):449-464.

National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators. Summary of the 2016 Certification Examinations and Renewal of Certification by Continuing Education. 2017. https://www.ncbde.org/about/annual-reports. Accessed April 1, 2018.

Anderson

Horvath

. The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):263-270.

10.

Fischman

. Who will take care of you? US News World Rep. 2005;138(4):44-46.

11.

Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

12.

Eng

Young

. Lay health advisors as community change agents. Fam Community Health. 1992;15(1):24-40.

13.

Stewart

Tilden

. The contributions of health care sciences to social support. Int J Nurs Stud. 1995;32(6):535-544.

14.

Dennis

. Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2002;40(3):321-332.

15.

Funnell

Tang

Anderson

. From DSME to DSMS: developing empowerment based self management support. Diabetes Spectrum. 2007;20(4):221-226.

16.

Tang

Funnell

Gillard

Nwankwo

Heisler

. The development of a pilot training program for peer leaders in diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37(1):67-77.

17.

Tang

Nwankwo

Whiten

Oney

. Training peers to deliver a church-based diabetes prevention program. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(4):519-525.

18.

Swider

. Outcome effectiveness of community health workers: an integrative literature review. Public Health Nursing. 2002;19(1):11-20.

19.

Norris

Chowdhury

Van Le

et al . Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):544-556.

20.

Thomapson

Horton

Flores

. Advancing diabetes self management in the Mexican-American population: a community health worker model in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33(suppl 6):159S-165S.

21.

Cherrington

Ayala

Amick

Scarinci

Allison

Corbie-Smith

. Applying the community health worker model to diabetes management: using mixed methods to assess implementation and effectiveness. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008;19(4): 1044-1059.

22.

American Association of Diabetes Educators. A Sustainable Model of Diabetes Self-Management Education/Training Involves a Multi-Level Team That Can Include Community Health Workers (White Paper). 2010. https://www.diabeteseducator.org/docs/default-source/legacy-docs/_resources/pdf/research/community_health_workers_white_paper.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2017.

23.

Balagopal

Kamalamma

Patel

Misra

. A community-based participatory diabetes prevention and management intervention in rural India using community health workers. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(6):822-834.

24.

US Census Bureau. QuickFacts, Fayette County, Pennsylvania. 2015. Accessed May 17, 2018. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/fayettecountypennsylvania/PST045217

25.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.

26.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853.

27.

The Look AHEAD Research Group. Long term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1566-1575.

28.

Funnell

. Peer-based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract. 2010;27(suppl 1):i17-i22.

29.

American Diabetes Association. 2018 Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(suppl 1):S38-S50.

30.

Funnell

Nwankwo

Gillard

Anderson

Tang

. Implementing an empowerment-based diabetes self-management education program. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(1):53, 55-56, 61.

31.

Toobert

Hampson

Glasgow

. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(7):943-950.

32.

Five-year findings of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. I. Reduction in the mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. (1979) JAMA. 242(23):2562-2571.

33.

Millay

. Accurately measuring blood pressure. http://accuratebloodpressure.com. Accessed April 18, 2012.

34.

Fitzgerald

Davis

Connell

Hess

Funnell

Hiss

. Development and validation of the diabetes care profile. Diabetes Care. 1996;9:209-230.

35.

Polonsky

Fisher

Earles

et al . Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(3):626-631.

36.

United States Department Agriculture Economic Research Service. Pennsylvania-Rural Definitions: State-Level Data. 2012. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/DataFiles/53180/25593_PA.pdf?v=39329. Accessed May 17, 2018.

37.

Harris

. Summary. In: National Diabetes Data Group, ed. Diabetes in America. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1995:1-14.

38.

Siminerio

Ruppert

Gabbay

. Who can provide diabetes self-management support in primary care? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39(5):705-713.

39.

Tang

Funnell

Sinco

et al . Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(6):1525-1534.

40.

Tang

Funnell

Gillard

Nwankwo

Heisler

. Training peers to provide ongoing diabetes self-management support (DSMS): results from a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):160-168.

41.

Dale

Williams

Bowyer

. What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2012;29(11):1361-1377.

42.

Tang

Funnell

Gillard

Nwankwo

Heisler

. The development of a pilot training program for peer leaders in diabetes: process and content. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37(1):67-77.

43.

Tang

Sohal

Garg

. Evaluating a diabetes self-management support peer leader training programme for the English- and Punjabi-speaking South-Asian community in Vancouver. Diabet Med. 2013;30(6):746-752.

44.

Moskowitz

Thom

Hessler

Ghorob

Bodenheimer

. Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most? J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(7):938-942.

45.

Lorig

Ritter

Villa

Armas

. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(4):641-651.