An Umbrella Review of Text Message Programs for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this umbrella review was to synthesize the evidence from published systematic reviews on the effectiveness of text message programs for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on glycemic management (A1C), self-management, and other clinical outcomes. The effect of directionality of the program was also explored.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using multiple databases. Inclusion criteria were systematic review of text message programs for adults with T2DM, evaluated A1C, and English language. Quality assessment was completed using AMSTAR-2 guidelines. Data were extracted by multiple coders, and results were synthesized.

Results

The final sample included 9 systematic reviews published between 2011 and 2019, with 72 unique international studies. Text message programs focused on diabetes self-management and reducing health risks through educational and motivational content with some providing personalized feedback. A meta-analysis of program effect on A1C was conducted in 5 reviews with a pooled difference in A1C from −0.38% to −0.8%. Adults with T2DM of shorter duration and lower A1C had better treatment effects. Evidence on unidirectional versus bidirectional programs is conflicting; however, both improve outcomes. Evidence of text message programs targeting medication engagement was inconclusive. Some programs improved blood pressure, lipids, self-management, self-efficacy, and health behaviors. High satisfaction and an average of 9.6% to 18.7% attrition was reported.

Conclusions

Text messaging programs can improve T2DM outcomes, are a highly accessible mode of communication, are relatively inexpensive, and are an underutilized adjunct to clinical care.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Diabetes Association. Facilitating behavior change and well-being to improve health outcomes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(suppl 1):S48-S65.

Powers

Bardsley

Cypress

, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialist the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of PAs, the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the American Pharmacist Association. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(4):350-369.

Horigan

Davies

Findlay-White

Chaney

Coates

Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2017;34(1):14-26.

Shrestha

Lipman

, et al. Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes—United States, 2011–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(46):1045-1049.

Carr

Kappagoda

Boseman

Cloud

Croom

Advancing diabetes-related equity through diabetes self-management education and training: existing coverage requirements and considerations for increased participation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020;26(suppl 2):S37-S44.

Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet, 2019. Accessed March 9, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/

Pew Research Center. Smartphones help blacks, Hispanics bridge some—but not all—digital gaps with whites, 2020. Accessed January 27, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/20/smartphones-help-blacks-hispanics-bridge-some-but-not-all-digital-gaps-with-whites/

Pew Research Center. Cell phone activities, 2012. Accessed March 9, 2020. https://www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/25/cell-phone-activities-2012/

Tatango. SMS open rates exceed 99%, 2013. Accessed January 27, 2020. https://www.tatango.com/blog/sms-open-rates-exceed-99/

10.

Mbuagbaw

Mursleen

Lytvyn

Smieja

Dolovich

Thabane

Mobile phone text messaging interventions for HIV and other chronic diseases: an overview of systematic reviews and framework for evidence transfer. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:33.

11.

Hall

Cole-Lewis

Bernhardt

JM.

Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36(1):393-415.

12.

Thakkar

Kurup

Laba

, et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):340-349.

13.

Arambepola

Ricci-Cabello

Manikavasagam

Roberts

French

Farmer

The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(4):e86.

14.

Haider

Sudini

Chow

Cheung

NW.

Mobile phone text messaging in improving glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;150:27-37.

15.

Liang

Wang

Yang

, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011;28(4):455-463.

16.

Kitsiou

Pare

Jaana

Gerber

Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173160.

17.

Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://www.covidence.org/home

18.

Aromataris

Fernandez

Godfrey

Holly

Khalil

Tungpunkom

Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):132-140.

19.

Shea

Reeves

Wells

, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.

20.

Dobson

Whittaker

Pfaeffli Dale

Maddison

The effectiveness of text message-based self-management interventions for poorly-controlled diabetes: a systematic review. Digit Health. 2017;3:2055207617740315.

21.

Saffari

Ghanizadeh

Koenig

HG.

Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes. 2014;8(4):275-285.

22.

Farmer

McSharry

Rowbotham

McGowan

Ricci-Cabello

French

DP.

Effects of interventions promoting monitoring of medication use and brief messaging on medication adherence for people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized trials. Diabet Med. 2016;33(5):565-579.

23.

de Andrade Hovadick

Reis

Torres

HC.

Short message service (SMS) and self-care promotion in type 2 DM: an integrative review. Acta Paul Enferm. 2019;32(2):210-219.

24.

Sahin

Courtney

Naylor

Rhodes

ER.

Tailored mobile text messaging interventions targeting type 2 diabetes self-management: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Digit Health. 2019;5:2055207619845279.

25.

Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists. An effective model of diabetes care and education: revising the AADE7 self-care behaviors®. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(2):139-160.

26.

Valles-Ortiz

Miranda-Felix

Garcia Sosa

ES.

Text messaging interventions to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes adults: systematic review. Enferm Glob. 2015;37:445-454.

27.

Greenwood

Gee

Fatkin

Peeples

A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):1015-1027.

28.

Vinitha

Nanditha

Snehalatha

, et al. Effectiveness of mobile phone text messaging in improving glycaemic control among persons with newly detected type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;158:107919.

29.

Nelson

Mulvaney

Gebretsadik

Johnson

Osborn

CY.

The MEssaging for Diabetes (MED) intervention improves short-term medication adherence among low-income adults with type 2 diabetes. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):995-1000.

30.

Fortmann

Gallo

Garcia

, et al. Dulce digital: an mHealth SMS-based intervention improves glycemic control in Hispanics with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(10):1349-1355.

31.

Watterson

Rodriguez

Shortell

Aguilera

Improved diabetes care management through a text-message intervention for low-income patients: mixed-methods pilot study. JMIR Diabetes. 2018;3(4):e15.

32.

Whittemore

Vilar-CM

La Cerda

, et al. ¡Sí, Yo puedo vivir sano con diabetes! A pilot self-management randomized controlled pilot trial for low-income adults with type 2 diabetes in Mexico City. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020;4(5):nzaa074.

33.

Heitkemper

Mamykina

Tobin

Cassells

Smaldone

Baseline characteristics and technology training of underserved adults with type 2 diabetes in the mobile diabetes detective (MoDD) randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(6): 576-588.

34.

Bell

Fonda

Walker

Schmidt

Vigersky

RA.

Mobile phone-based video messages for diabetes self-care support.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012;6(2):310-319.

35.

Pew Research Center. Latinos and digital technology, 2010. Accessed March 9, 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2011/02/09/latinos-and-digital-technology-2010/

36.

Chudasama

Gillies

Zaccardi

, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic diseases: a global survey of views from healthcare professionals. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020; 14(5):965-967.

37.

Wellframe, Inc. COVID-19 chronic condition patient population report. Accessed September 17, 2020. https://www.wellframe.com/Chronic-Condition-Patient-Population-Report_TY/

38.

Morgan

Balachandran

, et al. Remote monitoring of patients with Covid-19: design, implementation, and outcomes of the first 3,000 patients in COVID Watch. NEJM Cat, July 21 2020. doi: 10.1056/CAT.20.0342.