Computer-Based Patient Education: Use By Diabetes Educators

Abstract

The purpose of this descriptive study was to identify the concerns and characteristics that distinguish diabetes educators who use computers for patient education from those who do not. Three hundred certified diabetes educators who were current members of the American Association of Diabetes Educators were surveyed using the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and a demographic questionnaire compiled by the author. Results indicated that diabetes educators are interested in computer-based patient education as an educational strategy, even though most diabetes educators are not currently using the computer for patient education. Primary barriers to using computers were identified as lack of computer availability for patients and limited financial resources.

Because computers are becoming more pervasive in disseminating information about diabetes and new educational software is being developed for patients, diabetes educators need to learn more about this educational methodology for teaching their patients about diabetes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rogers E. Diffusions of innovations. New York: Free Press, 1983.

Miles M. Innovation in education. New York: Columbia University Teachers College, 1964.

Fliegel F. , Kivlin J. Attributes of innovation as factors in diffusion. Am J Sociol 1966;72:235-48.

Hall G. The concerns based approach to facilitating change. Educ Horizons 1979;57(4):202-8.

Bell J. The role of microcomputers in patient education. Comput Nurs 1990;20(1):33-44.

Kruchenberg K. The computerization of the patient education process. Comput Nurs 1990;8(3):116-22.

Tibbles L. , Lewis C. , Reisine S. , Rippey R. Computer assisted instruction for preoperative and postoperative patient education in joint replacement surgery. Comput Nurs 1992;10(5):208-12.

Wong J. , Wong S. A randomized controlled trial of a new approach to preoperative teaching and patient compliance. Int J Nurs Studies 1985 ;22(2):105-14.

Edison C. The design and application of a decision-making process for identification of critical curricular variables which affect optimal application of CAI in a baccalaureate school of nursing. Dis Abstracts 1981,42:2779B.

10.

Billings D. Computer assisted instruction for health professionals: a guide to designing and using CAI courseware. Norwalk, Conn: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1986.

11.

Masten Y. , Conover K. Automated continuing education and patient education. Comput Nurs 1990;8(4):144-50.

12.

Toole J. , Campbell S. The decade takes shape: computers in health care for the '90s. Comput Healthcare 1990;3:20-22.

13.

Estey A. , Meng H. , Mann K. Follow-up intervention: its effect on compliance behavior to a diabetes regimen . Diabetes Educ 1990;16(4):291-95.

14.

Denk J. , Martin J. , Sarangarm S. Not yet comfortable in the classroom: a study of academic computing at three land-grant universities. J Educ Technol Syst 1993;22(1):39-55.

15.

Belfrey M. , Winne P. A review of the effectiveness of computer assisted instruction in nursing education. Comput Nurs 1988;6:77-88.

16.

Edwardson S. , Pejsa J. A computer assisted tutorial for applications of computer spreadsheets in nursing financial management. Comput Nurs 1993;11(4):169-75.

17.

Horan P. , Yarborough M. , Besigel G. Carlson D. Computer-assisted self-control of diabetes by adolescents. Diabetes Educ 1990;16(3):205-11.

18.

Luker K. Computer assisted learning: a CAPD training program. In: Grobe SJ , Pluyter-Wenting ESP , eds. Nursing informatics: an overview for nursing in a technological era. New York: Elsevier, 1994.

19.

Ogolazek V. The automated pharmacist: comparing the use of leaflets, text-based computers and multimedia computers to provide medication information to the elderly. J Med Educ Technol 1993;Spring:6-11.

20.

Takabayashi K. YUMIS: Yahashira University medical instruction system. In: Grobe SJ , Pluyter-Wenting ESP , eds. Nursing informatics: an overview for nursing in a technological era. New York: Elsevier, 1994.

21.

Anderson R. , Donnelly M. , Hess G. An assessment of computer use, knowledge, and attitudes of diabetes educators. Diabetes Educ 1992;18(1):40-46.

22.

Funnell M. , Donnelly M. , Anderson R. , Johnson P. Perceived effectiveness, cost, and availability of patient education methods and materials. Diabetes Educ 1992;18(2):139-45.

23.

National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse. Computer programs for diabetes. Washington, DC: NDIC, 1993.

24.

Jordan-Marsh M. , Chang B. Assessing readiness for interaction with computers in medical centers. Comput Nurs 1985;3(6):266-71.

25.

Hall G. , George A. , Rutherford W. Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: a manual for use with the SoC questionnaire. Report no. TM006 654. Austin, Tex: University of Texas, The Research and Development Center for Teacher Education (Eric Document Reproduction Service no. ED 147 342), 1977 .

26.

Hall G. , Hord S. Change in schools: facilitating the process. New York: State University of New York Press, 1987.

27.

Smith J. , Pike R. , Jakubowski B. , Pardoe J. Survey of computer programs for diabetes management and education. Diabetes Educ 1988;14: 412-15.

28.

Cicchelli T. , Baecher R. Microcomputers in the classroom: focusing on teacher concerns. Comput Educ 1989;13(1):37-46.