Using a Focus Group to Design a Diabetes Education Program for an African American Population

Abstract

PURPOSE

the purpose of this project was to determine what factors need to be considered in planning a diabetes education program to better meet the needs of African Americans with diabetes in a community served by a suburban community hospital.

METHODS

Two focus group sessions were conducted. The sessions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by members of the research team.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged that had bearing on program development: (1) a sense of personal powerlessness, (2) fear related to complications, (3) recognition of knowledge deficits accompanied by an inability to link behavior to outcomes, and (4) a clear vision of what kind of educational setting would interest and benefit the group.

CONCLUSIONS

There were significant differences between what was being offered for diabetes education at the facility and what was desired according to the focus group, including factors of cost and leadership. Recommendations for future program planning are given.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. United States Department of Health and Human Services . Diabetes in African-Americans. Bethesda, Md: National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse; 1997. NIH publication 973-266.

2. Anderson RM , Herman WH , Davis JM , Freedman RP , Funnell MM , Neighbors HW . Barriers to improving diabetes care for blacks [editorial]. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:605-609.

3. Pichert JW , Briscoe VJ . A questionnaire for assessing barriers to healthcare utilization: Part I. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23: 181-191.

4. Maraldo PJ , Preziosi P , Binder LF . Talking Points. 2nd ed. New York: National League for Nursing Press; 1991:93-93. Publication 41-2287.

5. Sander-Phillips K . Correlates of health promotion behaviors in low-income black women and Latinas. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:450-458.

6. Lederman LC . Assessing educational effectiveness: the focus group interview as a technique for data collection. Commun Educ. 1990;39: 117-127.

7. Pichert JW , Briscoe VJ . Strategies for overcoming barriers to healthcare utilization: Part II. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23: 251-256.

8. Miller KC , Probart CK , Acherberg CL . Knowledge and misconceptions about the food label among women with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:425-432.

9. Carter JS , Gilliland SS , Perez GW , et al. Native American Diabetes Project: designing culturally relevant education materials. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:133-139.

10.

10. Quatromoni PA , Milbauer M , Posner BM , Carballeira NP , Brunt M , Chipkin SR . Use of focus groups to explore nutrition practices and health beliefs of urban Caribbean Latinos with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:869-873.

11.

11. Hahn J , Gordon D . How do you provide diabetes education to hard-to-reach, at-risk populations? J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96:1136-1137.

12.

12. Anderson RM , Barr PA , Edwards GJ , Funnell MM , Fitzgerald JT , Wisdom K . Using focus groups to identify psychosocial issues of urban black individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22:28-33.

13.

13. Maillet NA , Melkus GD , Spollett G . Using focus groups to characterize the health beliefs and practices of black women with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22:39-46.

14.

14. Kreuger RA . Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994.