Though often recognized as part of a discussion on unity, Ephesians 4:7-16 is seldom considered for its contributions to that discussion. Deviating from the usual focus on possible leadership structures in post-Pauline churches, this study focuses attention on what the passage says about the function of certain individuals in promoting unity. When social network and exchange theories are brought to bear on Ephesians 4:7-16, they illuminate strategies in the passage that underscore the role of teachers who protect the community from "false" information on the one hand and strengthen the community with "true" information on the other. Those strategies coordinate with the overt behavioral message of the passage. When community members respond as they should to those teachers, they are said to promote beneficial behavior that results in a more unified community. The net effect of such analysis is to de-emphasize Ephesians 4:7-16 as a reflector of ecclesiastical practices while re-focusing attention on what the passage is overtly trying to convey.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, B. and Carlos, M.L.1976. What Is Social Network Theory? Pp. 27-51 in T. Burns and W. Buckley (eds.), POWER AND CONTROL. London, UK: Sage.
2.
Banks, Robert.1994. PAUL'S IDEA OF COMMUNITY. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
3.
Barclay, John M.G.1988. OBEYING THE TRUTH: A STUDY OF PAUL'S ETHICS IN GALATIANS . Edinburgh, UK: T&T Clark.
4.
Barnes, J.A.1975. Network Analysis: Orienting Notion, Rigorous Technique or Substantive Field of Study? Pp. 403-23 in Perspec, tives on Social Network Research, edited by P.W. Holland and S. Leinhardt.New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
Barth, Markus.1974. EPHESIANS 4-6. New York, NY : Doubleday.
6.
Beare, Francis W.1953. The Epistle to the Ephesians. Pp. 597-749 in THE INTERPRETERS BIBLE, edited by GA Buttrick.New York, NY: Abingdon Press .
7.
Best, Ernest.1998. EPHESIANS. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
8.
Bruce, F.F.1985. THE EPISTLES TO THE COLOSSIANS, TO PHILEMON, AND TO THE EPHESIANS. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
9.
Burt, Ronald S.1992. STRUCTURAL HOLES. THE SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF COMPETITION . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Burt, Ronald S. and Schøtt, Thomas.1992. Relational Contents in Multiple Network Systems . Pp. 185-213 in RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS, edited by L.C. Freeman, D.R. White and A.K. Romney.Lanham, MD: George Mason University Press.
11.
Chadwick, Henry.1960. Die Absicht des Epheserbriefes. ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIE NEUTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT51:145-53.
12.
Chow, John K.1992. PATRONAGE AND POWER: A STUDY OF SOCIAL NETWORKS IN CORINTH . Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
13.
Clark, Elizabeth A.1992. Elite Networks and Heresy Accusations: Towards a Social Description of the Origenist Controversy. SEMEIA56: 74-117.
14.
Cook, Karen S.1982. Network Structures from an Exchange Perspective . Pp. 177-99 in SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND NETWORK ANALYSIS, edited by Peter V. Marsden and Nan Lin.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
Crosbie, Paul V.1975. INTERACTION IN SMALL GROUPS. New York, NY: MacMillan.
16.
Dahl, Nils Ahlstrup.1978. Interpreting Ephesians: Then and Now. CURRENTS IN THEOLOGY AND MISSION5: 133-43.
17.
Emerson, Richard M.1981. Social Exchange Theory. Pp. 30-65 in SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES, edited by Richard M. Emerson and R.H. Turner. New York, NY: Basic Books .
18.
Erickson, Bonnie H.1997. The Relational Basis of Attitudes. Pp. 99-121 in SOCIAL STRUCTURES: A NETWORK APPROACH, edited by B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
19.
Freeman, Linton C.1989. Social Networks and the Structure Experiment. Pp. 11-40 in RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS, edited by L.C. Freeman, D.R. White , and A.K. Romney.Lanham, MD: George Mason University Press.
20.
Freeman, Linton C., White, Douglas R. and Romney, A. Kimball (eds.) 1989. RESEARCH METHODS IN SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS . Lanham, MD: George Mason University Press.
21.
Fischer, Karl Martin.1973. TENDENZ UND ABSICHT DES EPHESERBRIEFES. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht .
22.
Gosnell, Peter W.1992. BEHAVING AS A CONVERT: MORAL TEACHING IN EPHESIANS AGAINST ITS TRADITIONAL AND SOCIAL BACKGROUNDS. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation: University of Sheffield.
23.
Granovetter Mark.1982. The Strength of Weak Ties. Pp. 105-30 in SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND NETWORK ANALYSIS, edited by Peter V. Marsden & Nan Lin.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
Hamann, Henry P.1988. The Translation of Ephesians 4:12-A Necessary Revision . CONCORDIA JOURNAL14: 42-49.
25.
1982. Church and Ministry: An Exegesis of Ephesians 4:1-16. LUTHERAN THEOLOGICAL JOURNAL16: 121-28.
26.
Holmberg, Bengt.1978. PAUL AND POWER. Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.
27.
Käsemann, E.1966. Ephesians and Acts. Pp. 288-97 in STUDIES IN LUKE-ACTS , edited by Leander E. Keck & J. Louis Martyn.London , UK: SPCK.
28.
Kirby, J.C.1968. EPHESIANS: BAPTISM AND PENTECOST. London, UK: SPCK.
29.
Klauck, Hans-Joseph.1973. Das Amt in der Kirche nach Eph 4, 1-16. WISSENSCHAFT UND WEISHEIT36: 81-100.
30.
Lincoln, Andrew T.1990. EPHESIANS. Dallas, TX: Word Books.
31.
MacDonald, Margaret Y.1988. THE PAULINE CHURCHES. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Maguire, Lambert.1983. UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL NETWORKS. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
Malherbe, Abraham J.1983. SOCIAL ASPECTS OF EARLY CHRISTIANITY. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
34.
Martin, Ralph P.1967-1968. An Epistle in Search of a Life-Setting . THE EXPOSITORY TIMES79: 296-302.
35.
Masson, Charles.1953. L'ÉPÎTRE DE SAINT PAUL AUX ÉPHÉSIENS. Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux & Niestlé SA.
36.
Meeks, Wayne.1983. THE FIRST URBAN CHRISTIANS. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Merklein, Helmut.1973. DAS KIRCHLICHE AMT NACH DEM EPHESERBRIEF. München, Germany: Kösel,Verlag.
38.
Meyer, Heinrich August Wilhelm.1884. CRITICAL AND EXEGETICAL HAND-BOOK TO THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. Translated by M.J. Evans. Revised and edited by W.P. Dickson.New York, NY: Funk & Wagnalls .
39.
Mitchell, Clyde J.1974Social Networks. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY3: 279-99.
40.
Mitton, C. Leslie.1973. EPHESIANS. London, UK: Marshall, Morgan & Scott.
41.
1951 . THE EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS: ITS AUTHORSHIP, ORIGIN AND PURPOSE . Oxford, UK, Clarendon Press.
42.
Nock, Arthur Danby.1933. CONVERSION. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
43.
Patzia, Arthur G.1990. EPHESIANS, COLOSSIANS, PHILEMON. Peabody, MA: Hendrikson.
44.
Remus, Harold.1996. Voluntary Association and Networks. Aelius Aristides at the Asclepieion in Pergamum. Pp. 146-75 in VOLUNTARY ASSOCIATIONS IN THE GRAECO-ROMAN WORLD, edited by John S. Kloppenborg & Stephen G. Wilson.New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
Robinson, J. Armitage.1928. ST. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE EPHESIANS. London, UK: MacMillan.
46.
Rogers, Everett M.1975. Network Analysis of the Diffusion of Innovations . Pp. 137-64 in PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL NETWORK RESEARCH, edited by P.W. Holland & S. Leinhardt.New York, NY: Academic Press .
47.
Schlier, Heinrich.1957. DER BRIEF AN DIE EPHESER. Düsseldorf , Germany: Patmos-Verlag.
48.
Schnackenburg, Rudolf.1991. EPHESIANS. Translated by Helen Heron. Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark.
49.
Scott, John.1991. SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS. A HANDBOOK. London, UK: Sage.
50.
Shulman, N.1976. Network Analysis: A New Addition to an Old Bag of Tricks . ACTA SOCIOLOGICA19: 307-23.
51.
Stark, Rodney S.1992. Epidemics, Networks, and the Rise of Chris, tianity . SEMEIA56: 159-75.
52.
Stark Rodney S. and Bainbridge, William Sims.1980. Networks of Faith: Interpersonal Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY85: 1376-95.
53.
Theissen, Gerd.1982. THE SOCIAL SETTING OF PAULINE CHRISTIANITY. Trandslated by John H. Schütz. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
54.
Usami, Koshi.1983. SOMATIC COMPREHENSION OF UNITY. Rome , Italy: Biblical Institute Press.
55.
Wellman, Barry.1997. Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance. Pp. 19-61 in SOCIAL STRUCTURES : A NETWORK APPROACH , edited by B. Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56.
Wellman, Barry and Berkowitz, S.D.1997. Studying Social Structures. Pp. 1-14 in SOCIAL STRUCTURES: A NETWORK APPROACH, edited by B. Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57.
White, L. Michael.1992a Finding the Ties that Bind: Issues from Social Description . SEMEIA56: 3-22.
58.
1992b. Social Networks: Theoretical Orientation and Historical Implications. SEMEIA56: 23-36.
59.
1987. Social Authority in the House Church Setting and Ephesians 4:1-16. RESTORATION QUARTERLY29: 209-28.
60.
1986. Sociological Analysis of Early Christian Groups: A Social Historian's Response. SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS47: 249-66.
61.
1985-1986. "Adolph Harnack and the 'Expansion' of Early Christianity: A Reappraisal of Social History." Second Century5: 97-127.
62.
White, L. Michael, ed. 1992. Social Networks in the Early Christian Environment: Issue and Methods for Social History. SEMEIA56: 23-36.
63.
Willer, David (ed.). 1999. NETWORK EXCHANGE THEORY. Westport, CT: Praeger.
