Zechariah's Unbelief and Early Jewish-Christian Relations: The Form and Structure of Luke 1:5–25 as a Clue to the Narrative Agenda of the Gospel of Luke
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2001
Zechariah's Unbelief and Early Jewish-Christian Relations: The Form and Structure of Luke 1:5–25 as a Clue to the Narrative Agenda of the Gospel of Luke
The narrative agenda of the Gospel of Luke seeks to move the implied reader (who resembles the “Godfearer” of Acts) from an interest in Judaism to conversion to Christianity. Luke 1:5–25 introduces this agenda by highlighting both continuity and discontinuity between Judaism and Christianity. Use of the Hebrew Bible commissioning narrative form establishes a continuity between Judaism and Christianity, appealing to the implied reader's attraction to Judaism yet suggesting conversion to Christianity as a natural next step. A chiastic structure that focuses on Zechariah's unbelieving response to the announcement of John's birth introduces a discontinuity between Judaism and Christianity, suggesting to the implied reader that the time has come to go beyond Judaism and embrace Christianity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baltzer, Klaus. 1968. Considerations Concerning the Office and Calling of the Prophet. HARVARD THEOLOGICAL REVIEW 61/4, 567–91.
2.
Benoit, Pierre. 1957. L’Enfance de Jean-Baptiste selon Luc I. NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES 3/3, 169–94.
3.
Brown, Raymond E.1993. THE BIRTH OF THE MESSIAH: A COMMENTARY ON THE INFANCY NARRATIVES IN THE GOSPELS OF MATTHEW AND LUKE. Rev. ed. Anchor Bible Reference Library. New York, NY: Doubleday.
4.
Casalegno, Alberto.1984. GESÙ E IL TEMPIO: STUDIO REDAZIONALE DILUCA-ATTI. Brescia, Italy: Morcelliana.
5.
Coleridge, Mark. 1993. The Birth of the Lukan Narrative: Narrative as Christology in Luke 1–2. JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 88. Sheffield, UK: JSOT Press.
6.
Dunn, James D. G.1992. The Question of Anti-Semitism in the New Testament Writings. Pp. 177–211 in JEWS AND CHRISTIANS: THE PARTING OF THE WAYS, A.D. 70 TO 135, edited by James D. G. Dunn. Wissenshcaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neun Testament, 66. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
7.
Ellis, E. Earle.1974. THE GOSPEL OF LUKE. Rev. ed. New Century Bible Commentary. London, UK: Marshall, Morgan & Scott.
8.
Ernst, Josef.1993. DAS EVANGELIUM NACH LUKAS. Regensburger Neues Testament. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet.
9.
Evans, C. F.1990. SAINT LUKE. TPI New Testament Commentaries. London, UK: SCM Press/Philadelphia, PA: Trinity Press International.
10.
Greenspahn, Frederick E. 1989. Why Prophecy Ceased. JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE 108/1, 37–49.
11.
Habel, N. 1965. The Form and Significance of the Call Narratives. ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT 77/3,297–323.
12.
Hubbard, Benjamin J. 1977. Commissioning Stories in Luke-Acts: A Study of Their Antecedents, Form and Content. SEMEIA 8,103–26.
13.
Jervell, Jacob.1972. LUKE-ACTS AND THE PEOPLE OF GOD: A NEW LOOK AT LUKE-ACTS. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House.
14.
Johnson, Luke Timothy.1991. THE GOSPEL OF LUKE. Sacra Pagina 3. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
15.
Klassen, W.1986. Anti-Judaism in Early Christianity: The State of the Question. Pp. 1–19 in Vol. 1 of ANTI-JUDAISM IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY, edited by Peter Richardson. Studies in Christianity and Judaism, 2. Waterloo, ON: Wilfried Laurier University Press.
16.
Kuntz, J. Kenneth.1967. THE SELF-REVELATION OF GOD. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
17.
Loisy, Alfred.1924. L’ÉVANGILE SELON LUC. Paris: Minerva G.M.B.H.
18.
Long, Burke O. 1972. Prophetic Call Traditions and Reports of Visions. ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT 84/4, 494–500.
19.
Lund, Nils W.1942. CHIASMUS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT: A STUDY IN THE FORM AND FUNCTION OF CHIASTIC STRUCTURES. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; reprint, Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson Publishers, 1992.
20.
Man, Ronald E. 1984. The Value of Chiasm for New Testament Interpretation. BIBLIOTHECA SACRA 141/562, 146–57.
21.
Marshall, I. Howard.1978. THE GOSPEL OF LUKE: A COMMENTARY ON THE GREEK TEXT. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
22.
Mullins, Terrence Y. New Testament Commission Forms, Especially in Luke-Acts 95/4, 603–14.
23.
Nolland, John1989. LUKE 1:1–9:20. Word Biblical Commentary 35a. Dallas: Word Books.
24.
Oppenheim, A. Leo.1956. THE INTERPRETATION OF DREAMS IN THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.
25.
Richter, Wolfgang.1970. DIE SOGENNANTEN VORPROPHETISCHEN BERUFUNGSBERICHTE. Forschungen zur Religion und Literatur des Alten und Neuen Testaments 101. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
26.
Ruddick, Jr., C. T. 1970. Birth Narratives in Genesis and Luke. NOVUM TESTAMENTUM 12/4, 343–48.
27.
Sanders, Jack T.1987. THE JEWS IN LUKE-ACTS. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
28.
Sandmel, Samuel. 1978. ANTI-SEMITISM IN THE NEW TESTAMENT? Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
29.
Schmithals, Walter1980. DAS EVANGELIUM NACH LUKAS. Zürcher Bibelkommentare. Zürich, Switzerland: Theologischer Verlag.
30.
Schweizer, Eduard.1984. THE GOOD NEWS ACCORDING TO LUKE, translated by David E. Green. Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press.
31.
Sternberg, Meir.1978. EXPOSITIONAL MODES AND TEMPORAL ORDERING IN FICTION. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32.
Stock, Augustine. 1984. Chiastic Awareness and Education in Antiquity. BIBLICAL THEOLOGY BULLETIN 14/1, 23–27.
33.
Tyson, Joseph B. 1995. Jews and Judaism in Luke-Acts: Reading As a Godfearer. NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES 41/1, 19–38.
