Sandbagging is a self-presentational strategy involving the false prediction or feigned demonstration of inability. Three studies explored the individual differences and situational variables influencing sandbagging behavior. Study 1 demonstrated that the newly created Sandbagging Scale possessed adequate reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The next two studies examined the social determinants of sandbagging. In Study 2, greater performance pressure led participants with higher scores on the Sandbagging Scale to predict worse performance on an upcoming task. In Study 3, participants with higher scores on the Sandbagging Scale were more likely to predict worse performance on an upcoming task to someone who was ostensibly evaluating their performance, but only when the individual did not possess prior performance information. Sandbagging is discussed as a self-presentational strategy used to reduce performance pressure and provide a low baseline against which subsequent performance can be compared.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
2.
Baumeister, R. F. , Hamilton, J. C., & Tice, D. M. (1985). Public versus private expectancy of success: Confidence booster or performance pressure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1447-1457.
3.
Baumgardner, A. H. , & Brownlee, E. A. (1987). Strategic failure in social interaction: Evidence for expectancy disconfirmation processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 525-535.
4.
Berglas, S. , & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to non-contingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
5.
Brickman, P. , & Seligman, C. (1974). Effects of public and private expectancies on attributions of competence and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 42, 558-568.
6.
Carver, C. S. , & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
Christiansen, N. D. , Lovejoy, M. C., Szymanski, J., & Lang, A. (1996). Evaluating the structural validity of measures of hierarchical models: An illustrative example using the social problem-solving inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 600-625.
8.
Cialdini, R. B. , & DeNicholas, M. E. (1989). Self-presentation by association. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 626-631.
9.
Cooper, W. H. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.
10.
Darley, J. M. , & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.
11.
Eagly, A. H. (1967). Involvement as a determinant of response to favorable and unfavorable information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 7, (3, Pt. 1).
12.
Fenigstein, A. , Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 522-527.
13.
Frey, D. (1978). Reactions to success and failure in public and private conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 172-179.
14.
Gellatly, I. R. , & Meyer, J. P. (1992). The effects of goal difficulty on physiological arousal, cognition, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 694-704.
15.
Gibson, B. , & Sachau, D. A. (1997, May). Mood of high and low sandbaggers in performance settings. Poster session presented at the 69th annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.
16.
Gilovich, T. , Kerr, M., & Medvec, V. H. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552-560.
17.
Godfrey, D. K. , Jones, E. E., & Lord, C. G. (1986). Self-promotion is not ingratiating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 106-115.
18.
Gould, R. , Brounstein, P. J., & Sigall, H. (1977). Attributing ability to an opponent: Public aggrandizement and private denigration. Sociometry, 40, 254-261.
19.
Heaton, A. W. , & Sigall, H. (1989). The “championship choke” revisited: The role of fear of acquiring a negative identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1019-1033.
20.
Higgins, R. L. , Snyder, C. R., & Berglas, S. (1990). Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t. New York: Plenum.
21.
Hinsz, V. B. (1992). Social influences on goal choices of group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1296-1317.
22.
Hoffer, R. (1993, October 11). Poor Lou. Sports Illustrated, 79(15), 84-86.
23.
Holtgraves, T. , & Srull, T. K. (1989). The effects of positive self-descriptions on impressions: General principles and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 452-462.
24.
Jones, E. E. , & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
25.
Jones, E. E. , Gergen, K. J., & Jones, R. G. (1963). Tactics of ingratiation among leaders and subordinates in a status hierarchy. Psychological Monographs, 77, (3, Whole No. 566).
26.
Jones, E. E. , & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Jones, E. E. , & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). The Self-Handicapping Scale. (Available from Frederick Rhodewalt, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT)
28.
Joreskog, K. G. , & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
29.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Levenson, R. W. (1983). Personality research and psychophysiology: General consideration. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 1-21.
31.
Miller, R. S. , & Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Egotism in group members: Public and private attributions of responsibility for group performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 85-89.
32.
Murphy, K. R. , Balzer, W. K., Lockhart, M. C., & Eisenmann, E. J. (1985). Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 72-84.
33.
Norem, J. K. , & Cantor, N. (1986a). Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in “risky” situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 347-362.
34.
Norem, J. K. , & Cantor, N. (1986b). Defensive pessimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208-1217.
35.
Rhodewalt, F. (1990). Self-handicappers: Individual differences in the preference for anticipatory self-protective acts. In R. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. Berglas (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t. New York: Plenum.
36.
Rhodewalt, F. , & Agustdottir, S. (1986). Effects of self-presentation on the phenomenal self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 47-55.
37.
Schlenker, B. R. , & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89-104.
38.
Seta, C. E. , & Seta, J. J. (1995). When audience presence is enjoyable: The influences of audience awareness of prior success on performance and task interest. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 95-108.
39.
Seta, J. J. , & Hassan, R. K. (1980). Awareness of prior success or failure: A critical factor in task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 70-76.
40.
Shepperd, J. A. , & Arkin, R. M. (1991). Behavioral other-enhancement: Strategically obscuring the link between performance and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 79-88.
41.
Shepperd, J. A. , & Socherman, R. E. (1997). On the manipulative behavior of low Machiavellians: Feigning incompetence to “sandbag” and opponent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1448-1459.
42.
Siegall, M. (1992). The effect of rater expectations on the evaluation of a hypothetical subordinate. Journal of Psychology, 126, 453-463.
43.
Snyder, M. (1984). When belief creates reality. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 67-114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
44.
Snyder, M. , & Swann, W. B. (1978). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
45.
Snyder, M. , Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656-666.
46.
Spencer, S. J. , Josephs, R. A., & Steele, C. M. (1993). Low self-esteem: The uphill struggle for self-integrity. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 21-36). New York: Plenum.
47.
Stires, L. K. , & Jones, E. E. (1969). Modesty versus self-enhancement as alternative forms of ingratiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 172-188.
48.
Zanna, M. P. , Sheras, P. L., Cooper, J., & Shaw, C. (1975). Pygmalion and Galatea: The interactive effect of teacher and student expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 279-287.
