The Role of Political Ideology in Mediating Judgments of Blame in Rape Victims and their Assailants: A Test of the Just World,Personal Responsibility,and Legitimization Hypotheses
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2000
The Role of Political Ideology in Mediating Judgments of Blame in Rape Victims and their Assailants: A Test of the Just World,Personal Responsibility,and Legitimization Hypotheses
Previous research often has shown that conservative ideology is positively correlated with the extent to which people blame victims of rape. However, much of this work has been descriptive, with little attention directed toward the development of theoretical models addressing why conservatism might play an important role in this area. Three hypotheses were tested. The just world hypothesis suggests that people blame others to preserve one’s view that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get. The personal responsibility hypothesis suggests that conservatism is associated with a tendency to hold people personally responsible for their own actions. The legitimization hypothesis stipulates that conservative perceivers are motivated to maintain traditional power differences between dominant and nondominant groups. Two studies showed much more support for the legitimization hypothesis compared to the other hypotheses. The implications of the present results for previous investigations of victim blaming are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acock, A. , & Ireland, N. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179-193.
2.
Anderson, K. B. , Cooper, H., & Okamura, L. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295-315.
3.
Blumer, H. (1961). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. In J. Masuoka & P. Valien (Eds.), Race relations: Problems and theory (pp. 217-227). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
4.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5.
Bruner, J. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In H. Gruber (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
7.
Burt, M. R. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 26-40). New York: John Wiley.
8.
Carroll, J. (1979). Judgments by parole boards. In I. H. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal, & J. S. Carroll (Eds.), New approaches to social problems: Applications of attribution theory (pp. 285-308). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Carroll, J. , Perkowitz, W., Lurigo, A., & Weaver, K. (1987). Sentencing goals, causal attributions, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 107-118.
10.
Conover, P. , & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal-conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.
11.
Dalbert, C. , & Yamauchi, L. A. (1994). Belief in a just world and attitudes towards immigrants and foreign workers: A cultural comparison between Hawaii and Germany. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1612-1626.
12.
Deitz, S. R. , Littman, M., & Bentley, B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10, 261-280.
13.
Drout, C. E. , & Gaertner, S. L. (1994). Gender differences in reactions to female victims. Social Behavior and Personality, 22, 267-277.
14.
Feather, N. (1985). Attitudes, values, and attributions: Explanations of unemployment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 876-889.
15.
Furnham, A. , & Procter, E. (1989). Belief in a just world: Review and critique of the individual difference literature. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 365-384.
16.
Gilmartin-Zena, P. (1987). Attitudes toward rape: Student characteristics as predictors. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 15, 175-182.
17.
Green, D. P. (1988). On the dimensionality of public sentiment toward partisan and ideological groups. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 758-780.
18.
Hafer, C. L. , & Olson, J. (1993). Belief in a just world, discontent, and assertive actions by working women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 30-38.
19.
Hogarth, R. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
20.
Janoff-Bulman, R. , Timko, C., & Carli, L. L. (1985). Cognitive biases in blaming the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 161-177.
21.
Jenkins, M. J. , & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer’s attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875-890.
22.
Katz, I. , & Hass, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
23.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Kleinke, C. L. , & Meyer, C. (1990). Evaluation of rape victims by men and women with high and low belief in a just world. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 343-353.
25.
Koss, M. P. , Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim’s experience?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1-24.
26.
Lambert, A. J. , Burroughs, T., & Nguyen, T. (1999). Perceptions of risk and the “buffering hypothesis”: The role of just world beliefs and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 643-656.
27.
Lambert, A. J. , & Chasteen, A. L. (1997). Perceptions of deviance vs. disadvantage: political values and prejudice toward the elderly vs. Blacks. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 469-481.
28.
Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer’s reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 355-360.
29.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
30.
Lerner, M. J. , & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1050.
31.
Linz, D. G. , Donnerstein, E., & Penrod, S. (1988). Effects of long-term exposure to violent and sexually degrading depictions of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 758-768.
32.
Lipkus, I. M. , & Bissonnette, V. L. (1996). Relationships among belief in a just world, willingness to accommodate, and marital well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1043-1056.
33.
Lipkus, I. M. , Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus others: Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 666-677.
34.
Lonsway, K. A. (1994). Emotions, empathy, and rape myth motivation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.
35.
Lonsway, K. A. , & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
36.
McCaul, K. , Veltum, L. G., Boyechko, V., & Crawford, J. J. (1990). Understanding attributions of victim blame for rape: Sex, violence, forseeability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1-26.
37.
Raichle, K. (1996). Rape and ideology. Unpublished undergraduate honor’s thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.
38.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
39.
Rubin, Z. , & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65-90.
40.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
42.
Skitka, L. J. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Of ants and grasshoppers: The political psychology of allocating public assistance. In B. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Smith, A. W. (1981). Racial tolerance as a function of group position. American Sociological Review, 46, 558-573.
44.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
45.
Zucker, G. S. , & Weiner, B. (1993). Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 925-943.
