This research investigated whether self-handicapping preserves specific conceptions of ability in a particular domain despite poor performance. Reports of preparatory behaviors and stress among introductory psychology students were measured prior to an exam and subsequent performance, attributions for the performance, and measures of global self-esteem and specific self-conceptions were measured after the exam. Results indicated that high self-handicappers reported reduced effort and more stress prior to the exam, performed worse on the exam, and made different attributions following the exam than did low self-handicappers. Although reported self-handicapping was detrimental to performance, male HSH individuals maintained positive conceptions of specific ability in psychology in spite of poorer performance. Moreover, the results of path analyses indicated that it was these changes in specific ability beliefs that mediated changes in global self-esteem. These findings suggest that the primary motivation underlying self-handicapping may be to protect conceptions of ability in a specific domain, which thereby serves to protect global self-esteem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Arkin, R. M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985). Self-handicapping. In J. H. Harvey & G. W. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 169-202). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Berglas, S., & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
4.
Feick, D. L., & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 147-163.
5.
Harris, R. N., & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451-458.
6.
Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 981-991.
7.
Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Boris, H. I. (2000). Audience reaction in self-handicapping: A matter of who sees what in whom. Manuscript submitted for publication, Indiana University-Bloomington.
8.
Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Kimble, C. E. (2000). Public self-focus and sex differences in behavioral self-handicapping: Does increasing self-threat still make it “just a man’s game?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1131-1141.
9.
Isleib, R. A., Vuchinich, R. E., & Tucker, J. A. (1988). Performance attributions and changes in self-esteem following self-handicapping with alcohol consumption. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 88-103.
10.
Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
11.
Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-Handicapping Scale. Unpublished scale, Department of Psychology, Princeton University and University of Utah.
12.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
13.
Kolditz, T. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1982). An impression management interpretation of the self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 492-502.
14.
Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps vs. self-reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1265-1268.
15.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality: Selected papers (D. E. Adams & K. E. Zener, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Mayerson, N. H., & Rhodewalt, F. (1988). The role of self-protective attributions in the experience of pain. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 203-218.
17.
McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 937-946.
18.
Murray, C. B., & Warden, M. R. (1991). Implications of self-handicapping strategies for academic achievement: A reconceptualization. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 23-37.
19.
Pelham, B. W., & Swann, W. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672-680.
20.
Rhodewalt, F., & Hill, S. K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 397-416.
21.
Rhodewalt, F., Morf, C., Hazlett, S., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Self-handicapping: The role of discounting and augmentation in the preservation of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 122-131.
22.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Smith, D. S., & Strube, M. J. (1991). Self-protective tendencies as moderators of self-handicapping impressions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 63-80.
24.
Snyder, C. R. (1990). Self-handicapping processes and sequelae: On taking a psychological dive. In R. L. Higgins, C. R. Snyder, & S. Berglas, (Eds.), Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t (pp. 104-150). New York: Plenum.
25.
Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirel (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology (pp. 104-127). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5-19.
28.
Strube, M. J. (1986). An analysis of the Self-Handicapping Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 211-234.
29.
Tesser, A., & Cornell, D. P. (1991). On the confluence of self-processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 501-526.
30.
Tesser, A., Martin, L. L., & Cornell, D. P. (1996). On the substitutability of self-protective mechanisms. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 48-68). New York: Guilford.
31.
Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement?: Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 711-725.
32.
Touhey, J. C., & Villemez, W. J. (1980). Ability attribution as a result of variable effort and achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 211-216.
