The authors examined the roles of chronic expectancies and other contextual information in the dispositional inference process within the domain of ability judgments. Prior to viewing a videotaped performance under either cognitive load or no load, participants in Studies 1 and 2 were given additional information designed to constrain their categorizations of the performance. In Study 2, chronic future-event expectancies also were assessed. Analyses revealed that when under cognitive load, participants’ ability inferences were assimilated to the constraint information (Studies 1 and 2) and to chronic expectancies (Study 2). Furthermore, Study 2 analyses revealed that these effects were mediated by participants’ behavior categorizations. Evidence suggestive of a proceduralized form of correction for task difficulty (Studies 1 and 2) and an effortful, awareness-based correction for the constraint information and for chronic expectancies also was found. Results are examined in light of recent models of the dispositional inference process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, S. M. (1990). The inevitability of future suffering: The role of depressive predictive certainty in depression. Social Cognition, 8, 203-228.
2.
Andersen, S. M., Spielman, L. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1992). Future-event schemas and certainty about the future: Automaticity in depressives’ future-event predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 711-723.
3.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber.
5.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1-25.
6.
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285.
7.
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509-517.
8.
Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989). Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 940-949.
9.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 733-740.
10.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
11.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
12.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Krull, D. S. (1993). Does the grist change the mill? The effect of the perceiver’s inferential goal on the process of social inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 340-348.
14.
Krull, D. S., & Dill, J. C. (1996). On thinking first and responding fast: Flexibility in social inference processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 949-959.
15.
Krull, D. S., & Erickson, D. J. (1995). Judging situations: On the effortful process of taking dispositional information into account. Social Cognition, 13, 417-438.
16.
Lucas, M., Krull, D. S., & Pelham, B. W. (1999). Practice makes perfect? The effect of familiarity with constraint on the correspondence bias. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association meeting, Chicago.
17.
Reeder, G. D. (1997). Dispositional inferences of ability: Content and process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 171-189.
18.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
19.
Reich, D. A., & Weary, G. (1998). Depressives’ future-event schemas and the social inference process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1133-1145.
20.
Spielman, L. A., & Bargh, J. A. (1990). The influence of immediately prior administration of depression inventories on tests of depressogenic cognition: The BDI priming effect. Unpublished manuscript, New York University.
21.
Stapel, D. A., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1998). The smell of bias: What instigates correction processes in social judgments?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 797-806.
22.
Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic Reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.
23.
Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.
24.
Trope, Y., & Alfieri, T. (1997). Effortfulness and flexibility of dispositional judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 662-674.
25.
Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (1999). A dual process model of overconfident attributional inferences. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 141-160). New York: Guilford.
26.
Weary, G., & Reich, D. A. (1999). Attributional effects of conflicting chronic and temporary outcome expectancies: A case of automatic comparison and contrast. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Weary, G., Tobin, S. J., & Reich, D. A. (1999). Chronic and temporary expectancies as comparison standards: Automatic contrast in dispositional judgments. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
Yost, J. H., & Weary, G. (1996). Depression and the correspondence inference bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 192-200.
