The authors argue that individuals with more negative models of self are involved in less satisfying relationships because they have difficulty believing that they are loved by good partners. Dating and married couples completed measures of self-models, perceptions of the partner’s love, perceptions of the partner, and relationship well-being. The results revealed that individuals troubled by self-doubt underestimated the strength of their partners’ love. Such unwarranted insecurities predicted less positive perceptions of their partners. In conjunction, feeling less loved by a less-valuable partner predicted less satisfaction and less optimism for the future than the partner’s feelings of love and commitment warranted. A dependency regulation model is described, where feeling loved by a good, responsive partner is thought to represent a sense of felt security that diminishes the risks of interdependence and promotes closeness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, A. , Dutton, D. G., Aron, E. N., & Iverson, A. (1989). Experiences of falling in love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 243-257.
2.
Baldwin, M. W. , & Sinclair, L. (1996). Self-esteem and “if... then” contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130-1141.
3.
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147-178.
4.
Bartholomew, K. , & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
5.
Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum.
6.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
7.
Berscheid, E. , & Fei, J. (1977). Romantic love and sexual jealousy. In G. Clanton & L. G. Smith (Eds.), Jealousy (pp. 101-109). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. London: Hogarth.
9.
Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Clark, M. S. , & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609-672.
12.
Collins, N. L. , & Read, S. J. (1994). Cognitive representations of attachment: The structure and function of working models. Advances in Personal Relationships, 5, 53-90.
13.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schocken.
14.
Downey, G. , Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545-560.
15.
Edwards, J. R. (1994). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20, 683-689.
16.
Fincham, F. D. , & Bradbury, T. N. (1993). Marital satisfaction, depression and attributions: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 442-452.
17.
Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Griffin, D. W. , & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and other: Fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 430-445.
19.
Griffin, D. W. , Murray, S., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6, 505-518.
20.
Hazan, C. , & Diamond, L. (in press). The limits of sexual strategies theory and the promise of attachment theory for explaining human mating. Review of General Psychology.
21.
Hazan, C. , & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1-22.
22.
Hendrick, S. S. , Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 980-988.
23.
Holmes, J. G. , & Rempel, J. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Close relationships (Vol. 10, pp. 187-219). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Karney, B. R. , & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075-1092.
25.
Kelley, H. H. (1983). Love and commitment. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships (pp. 265-314). New York: Freeman.
26.
Kelly, E. L. , & Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 27-40.
27.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
28.
Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279-294.
29.
Leary, M. R. , Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518-530.
30.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Murray, S. L. , Bellavia, G., & Rose, P. (2000). The daily experiences of dating and married couples. Unpublished data, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
32.
Murray, S. L. , & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586-604.
33.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., Dolderman, D., & Griffin, D. W. (2000). What the motivated mind sees: Comparing friends’ perspectives to married partners views of each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 600-620.
34.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
35.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155-1180.
36.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (2000). Self-esteem and the quest for felt security: How perceived regard regulates attachment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 478-498.
37.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1459-1480.
38.
Nezlek, J. B. , Kowalski, R. M., Leary, M. R., Blevins, T., & Holgate, S. (1997). Personality moderators of reactions to interpersonal rejection: Depression and trait self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1235-1244.
39.
Reis, H. T. , & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367-389). New York: John Wiley.
40.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Shrauger, J. S. , & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of the self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573.
42.
Swann, W. B. , Hixon, J. G., & De La Ronde, C. (1992). Embracing the bitter “truth”: Negative self-concepts and marital commitment. Psychological Science, 3, 118-121.
43.
Wieselquist, J. , Rusbult, C. E., Foster, C. A., & Agnew, C. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942-966.
