The role of congruence and incongruence in diverse decision-making groups is examined by manipulating opinion agreement within and between members of different social categories. Congruence occurs when ingroup members agree with one another and outgroup members disagree, whereas incongruence occurs when an ingroup member disagrees with a majority composed of ingroup and outgroup members. The results of two studies, one using a scenario methodology and the second using simulated work teams with two ingroup members and one outgroup member, show that regardless of the task-relevance of salient differences, individuals respond most favorably when categorical and opinion differences are congruent. Study 1 examined individuals’ emotional reactions and group efficacy. Study 2 examined group performance, the minority influence process, and efforts to maintain congruence. The findings suggest that outgroup minority opinion holders may be more influential in diverse group decision-making settings than ingroup minority opinion holders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, V.L., & Wilder, D.A. (1975). Categorization, beliefs similarity, and intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.
2.
Allen, V.L., & Wilder, D.A. (1979). Group categorization and attribution of belief similarity. Small Group Behavior, 10, 73-80.
3.
Alvaro, E.M., & Crano, W.D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
4.
Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
5.
Argote, L., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Naquin, C. (2000). In M.E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 369-411). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Asch, S.E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
8.
Brewer, M.B., & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M.B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
9.
Brown, R.J. (1984). The role of similarity in intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 603-623). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Brown, R.J., & Abrams, D. (1986). The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 78-92.
11.
Brown, R.J., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
12.
Brown, R.J., & Turner, J.C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behavior. In J.C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
Brown, R.J., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behaviour: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
14.
Burgoon, J.K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48.
15.
Charlesworth, W.R. (1969). The role of surprise in cognitive development. In D. Elkind & J.H. Flavell (Eds.), Studies in cognitive development (pp. 257-314). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
Clark, R.D., III, & Maass, A. (1988). Social categorization in minority influence: The case of homosexuality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 347-364.
17.
Crano, W.D., & Alvaro, E.M. (1998). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. In M. Hewstone & W. Strobe (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 175-188). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18.
Crano, W.D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
19.
Crano, W.D., & Cooper, R.E. (1973). Examination of Newcomb’s extension of structural balance theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 344-353.
20.
Crano, W.D., & Hannula-Bral, K.A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 247-276.
21.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage?British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
22.
Davis, J.H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
23.
Diehl, M. (1988). Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 289-300.
24.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
25.
Fiedler, F.E. (1953). The psychological-distance dimension in interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality, 22, 142-150.
26.
Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A., & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), The European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-25). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27.
Gibson, C.B., Randel, A.E., & Earley, P.C. (2000). Understanding group efficacy: An empirical test of multiple assessment methods. Group & Organization Management, 25, 67-97.
28.
Gorenflo, D.W., & Crano, W.D. (1989). Judgmental subjectivity/objectivity and locus of choice in social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 605-614.
29.
Grieger, R.M. (1986). Anger problems. In A. Ellis & R.M. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 121-140). New York: Springer.
30.
Gruenfeld, D.H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5-20.
31.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Hewstone, M., & Brown, R.J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis.” In M. Hewstone & R.J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
33.
Holtz, R., & Miller, N. (1985). Assumed similarity and opinion certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 890-898.
34.
Izard, C.E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum.
35.
Jehn, K.A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
36.
Kramer, R.M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 13, pp. 191-228). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
Laughlin, P.R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Maass, A., & Clark, R.D., III. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
39.
Maass, A., Clark, R.D., III, & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 89-104.
40.
Marques, J.M. (1990). The black sheep effect: Outgroup homogeneity in social comparison settings. In D. Abrams & M.A. Hoggs (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131-151). New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Mischel, L.J., & Northcraft, G.B. (1997). I think we can, I think we can . . . : The role of efficacy beliefs in group and team effectiveness. In B. Markovsky, M.J. Lovaglia, et al. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 14, pp. 177-197). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
42.
Moscovici, S. (1985a). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 9-52). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Moscovici, S. (1985b). Social influence and conformity. InG. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
44.
Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London: Academic Press.
45.
Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1982). Minority influence and psychosocial identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 379-394.
46.
Nemeth, C. (1985). Dissent, group process, and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 57-75). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47.
Nemeth, C.J., & Wachtler, J. (1973). Consistency and modification of judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 65-79.
48.
Nemeth, C.J., & Wachtler, J. (1983). Creative problem solving as a result of majority versus minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 45-55.
49.
Newcomb, T.M. (1968). Interpersonal balance. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
50.
Perez, J.A., & Mugny, G. (1987). Paradoxical effects of categorization in minority influence: When being an outgroup is an advantage. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 157-169.
51.
Prislin, R., Limbert, W.M., & Bauer, E. (2000). From majority to minority and vice versa: The asymmetrical effects of losing and gaining majority position within a group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 385-397.
52.
Scherer, K.R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K.R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
54.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
55.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology and intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
56.
Turner, J.C. (1978). Social categorization and social discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
57.
Turner, J.C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In J.C. Turner, M.A. Hogg, P.J. Oakes, S.D. Reicher, & M.S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
Van Dyne, L., & Saavedra, R. (1996). A naturalistic minority influence experiment: Effects on divergent thinking, conflict and originality in work groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 151-167.
59.
Volpato, C., Maass, A., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Vitti, E. (1990). Minority influence and social categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 119-132.
60.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
61.
Whitney, K. (1994). Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy. Human Performance, 7, 55-78.
62.
Wilder, D.A., & Allen, V.L. (1978). Group membership and preference for information about other persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 106-110.
63.
Williams, K.Y., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1998). The complexity of diversity: A review of forty years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 77-90). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
64.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
