In two studies, the authors investigated guilt as a response to group-based advantage. Consistent with its conceptualization as a self-focused emotion, White guilt was based in self-focused beliefs in racial inequality. Thus, guilt was associated with belief in White privilege (Study 1) and resulted from seeing European Americans as perpetrators of racial discrimination (Study 2). Just as personal guilt is associated with efforts at restitution, White guilt was predictive of support for affirmative action programs aimed at compensating African Americans. White guilt was not, however, predictive of support for noncompensatory efforts at promoting equality, such as affirmative action programs that increase opportunities (Study 2). In contrast, the other-focused emotion of group-based sympathy was a more general predictor of support for different affirmative action policies. Our findings demonstrate the benefits and limits of group-based guilt as a basis of support for social equality and highlight the value of understanding the specific emotions elicited in intergroup contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychological Association. (1996). Affirmative action: Who benefits? A briefing paper of the American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ppo/aa.html
2.
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: Norton.
3.
Batson, C.D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282-316). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Baumeister, R.F., Reis, H.T., & Delespaul, P.A. (1995). Subjective and experiential correlates of guilt in daily life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(12), 1256-1268.
Bobo, L., & Kluegel, J.R. (1993). Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes?American Sociological Review, 58, 443-464.
7.
Branscombe, N.R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
8.
Branscombe, N.R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D.M. Mackie & E.R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
9.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
10.
Brewer, M.B. (1986). The role of ethnocentrism in intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 88-102). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
11.
Crosby, F.J., & Van de Veer, C. (Eds.). (2000). Sex, race, and merit: Debating affirmative action in education and employment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
12.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872-886.
13.
Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Golden, H., Hinkle, S., & Crosby, F.J. (2001). Reactions to affirmative action: Substance and semantics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 73-88.
15.
Hoffman, M.L. (1976). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281-313). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Hoffman, M.L. (1991). Empathy and prosocial activism. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski, & E. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values: Individual and societal perspectives (pp. 65-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Iyer, A., Leach, C.W., & Pedersen, A. (in press). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. In N.R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kravitz, D.A. (1995). Attitudes toward affirmative action plans directed at Blacks: Effects of plan and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(24), 2192-2220.
19.
Kravitz, D.A., Harrison, D.A., Turner, M.E., Levine, E.L., Chaves, W., Brannick, M.T., et al. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
20.
Kravitz, D.A., & Platania, J. (1993). Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 928-938.
21.
Leach, C.W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H.J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Lutz, C.A., & Abu-Lughod, L. (Eds.). (1990). Language and the politics of emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Mackie, D.M., Devos, T., & Smith, E.R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602-616.
24.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3(4), 313-344.
25.
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 1-27.
26.
Niedenthal, P.M., Tangney, J.P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “If only I weren’ t” versus “If only I hadn’ t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 585-595.
27.
Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
29.
Roseman, I.J., Spindel, M.S., & Jose, P.E. (1990). Appraisals of emotioneliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899-915.
30.
Roseman, I.J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T.S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 206-221.
31.
Salovey, P., & Rosenhan, D.L. (1989). Mood states and prosocial behavior. In H. Wagner & A. Manstead (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 371-391). New York: John Wiley.
32.
Schmermund, A., Sellers, R., Mueller, B., & Crosby, F.J. (2001). Attitudes toward affirmative action as a function of racial identity among Black college students. Political Psychology, 22, 759-774.
33.
Smith, E.R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward a new conceptualization of prejudice. In D.M. Mackie & D.L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
Steele, S. (1990). The content of our character. New York: Harper Perennial.
35.
Stephanopoulos, G., & Edley, Jr., C. (1995). Affirmative action review: Report to the president. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
Swim, J.K., & Miller, D.L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 500-514.
37.
Tangney, J.P., & Fischer, K.W. (Eds.). (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York: Guilford.
38.
Taylor-Carter, M.A., Doverspike, D., & Cook, K. (1995). Understanding resistance to sex and race-based affirmative action: A review of research findings. Human Resources Management Review, 5(2), 129-157.
39.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1074.
40.
Weiner, B. (1982). The emotional consequences of causal attributions. In M.S. Clark & S.T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 185-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
