She Swings,She Hits,She’s Great,She’s Benched: Implications of Gender-Based Shifting Standards for Judgment and Behavior

Abstract

The implications of the shifting standards model for understanding behavior toward stereotyped groups were examined in two studies on gender and athleticism. Participants played the role of co-ed softball team managers, who made team selections, position assignments, and judgments about a series of male and female players. The data supported three hypotheses: (a) Stereotypes of male superiority as athletes lead to the use of shifting standards to judge athletic performance; (b) zero-sum behaviors (allocation of limited resources) show evidence of pro-male bias, whereas non-zero-sum behaviors (verbal and nonverbal reactions) show evidence of pro-female bias; and (c) objective judgments are somewhat better predictors of zero-sum behaviors, whereas subjective judgments are better predictors of non-zerosum behaviors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bettencourt, B. A. , Dill, K. E. , Greathouse, S. A. , Charlton, K. , & Mulholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275.

Biernat, M. (1989). Achievement motives and values: Different constructs with different effects. Journal of Personality, 57, 69-95.

Biernat, M. (1995). The shifting standards model: Implications of stereotype accuracy for social judgment. In Y. T. Lee , L. J. Jussim , & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 87-114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Biernat, M. , Crandall, C. S. , Young, L. V. , Kobrynowicz, D. , & Halpin, S. M. (1998). All that you can be: Stereotyping of self and others in a military context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 301-317.

Biernat, M. , & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender- and race-based standards of competence: Lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544-557.

Biernat, M. , & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.

Biernat, M. , Manis, M. , & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Simultaneous assimilation and contrast effects in judgments of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 254-269.

Biernat, M. , Manis, M. , & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485-499.

Biernat, M. , Vescio, T. K. , & Manis, M. (1998). Judging and behaving toward members of stereotyped groups: A shifting standards perspective. In C. Sedikides , J. Schopler , & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 151-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Brewer, M. B. , (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Darley, J. M. , & Gross, P. H. (1983). A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 20-33.

12.

Dovidio, J. F. , Brigham, J. C. , Johnson, B. T. , & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae , C. Stangor , & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 276-319). New York: Guilford.

13.

Dovidio, J. F. , & Fazio, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 204-237). New York: Russell Sage.

14.

Dovidio, J. F. , Kawakami, K. , Johnson, C. , Johnson, B. , & Howard, A. (1997). On the nature of prejudice: Automatic and controlled processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 510-540.

15.

Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE Model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

16.

Fazio, R. H. , Jackson, J. R. , Dunton, B. C. , & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.

17.

Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.

18.

Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.

19.

Foschi, M. (1992). Gender and double standards for competence. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 181-207). New York: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Gupta, N. , Jenkins, G. D., Jr. , & Beehr, T. A. (1983). Employee gender, gender similarity, and supervisor-subordinate cross-evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 174-184.

21.

Hamilton, D. L. , & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

22.

Harber, K. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 622-628.

23.

Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

24.

Jussim, L. , Coleman, L. M. , & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536-546.

25.

Kobrynowicz, D. , & Biernat, M. (1997). Decoding subjective evaluations: How stereotypes provide shifting standards. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 579-601.

26.

Kunda, Z. , & Sherman-Williams, B. (1993). Stereotypes and the construal of individuating information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 90-99.

27.

Kunda, Z. , & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.

28.

Manis, M. , Nelson, T. E. , & Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28-36.

29.

Massey, G. , Scott, V. , & Dornbusch, S. (1975, November). Racism without racists: Institutional racism in urban schools. The Black Scholar, pp. 10-19.

30.

McClelland, D. C. (1980). Motive dispositions: The merits of operant and respondent measures. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 10-41). London: Sage Ltd.

31.

McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812-823.

32.

McClelland, D. C. , Koestner, R. , & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.

33.

Pettigrew, T. , & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.

34.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

35.

Stangor, C. , & Lange, J. E. (1994). Mental representations of social groups: Advances in understanding stereotypes and stereotyping. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 357-416). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

36.

Stapel, D. A. , & Koomen, W. (1998). When stereotype activation results in (counter) stereotypical judgments: Priming stereotype-relevant traits and exemplars. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 136-163.

37.

Stapel, D. A. , Koomen, W. , & van der Pligt, J. (1997). Categories of category accessibility: The impact of trait concept versus exemplar priming on person judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 47-76.

38.

Stapel, D. A. , & Winkielman, P. (1998). Assimilation and contrast as a function of context-target similarity, distinctness, and dimensional relevance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 634-646.

39.

Steele, C. (1992, April). Race and the schooling of Black Americans. Atlantic Monthly, pp. 68-78.

40.

von Hippel, W. , Sekaquaptewa, D. , & Vargas, P. (1995). On the role of encoding processes in stereotype maintenance. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 27, pp. 177-254). New York: Academic Press.

41.

Weitz, S. (1972). Attitude, voice, and behavior: A repressed affect model of interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 14-21.

42.

Word, C. O. , Zanna, M. P. , & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 109-120.