This study tested the validity of two models predicting states of loneliness: the social network mediation model and the cognitive bias model. The social network mediation model posits that personal dispositions influence states of loneliness through various dimensions of the social network. According to the cognitive bias model, states of loneliness are not explained by social network characteristics but rather by a negative cognitive filter related to personality. Unique aspects of the study included testing these two models while selecting attachment security as a personal disposition variable and using reports from participants and friends to assess social support. A new model combining processes outlined in both previous models (which we called the cognitive-network model) was found to be the best representation of our data. Discussion centers on the implications of this model for social support research and interventions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, E. (1987). Forces influencing student persistence and achievement. In L. Noel, R. Levitz, & D. Saluri (Eds.), Increasing student retention (pp. 44-61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Armsden, G. C. , & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(5), 427-454.
3.
Armsden, G. C. , & Greenberg, M. (1989). Inventory of parent and peer attachment: Preliminary test manual. Available from G. C. Department of Community Health Care Systems, University of Washington, Seattle.
4.
Austin, B. A. (1983). Factorial structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Psychological Reports, 53, 883-889.
5.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6.
Bentler, P. M. (1993). EQS structural equation program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
7.
Bernier, A. , Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (1998). L’organisation cognitive du système d’attachement et la prédictions des perceptions des comportements de soutien social à l’adolescence. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 141-145.
8.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Cassidy, J. , & Berlin, L. J. (1999). Understanding the origins of childhood loneliness: Contributions of attachment theory. In K. J. Rotenberg & S. Hymel (Eds.), Loneliness in childhood and adolescence (pp. 34-55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cassidy, J. , Kirsh, S. J., Scolton, K. L., & Parke, R. D. (1996). Attachment and representations of peer relationships. Developmental Psychology, 32, 892-904.
11.
Chou, C. P. , & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Christensen, P. N. , & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Perceptions of and by lonely people in initial social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 322-329.
13.
Cohen, S. , & Hoberman, H. M. (1983). Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 99-125.
14.
Cutrona, C. E. , & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). New York: John Wiley.
15.
Davis, M. H. , Morris, M. M., & Kraus, L. A. (1998). Relationship-specific and global perceptions of social support: Associations with well-being and attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 468-481.
16.
De Jong, M. L. (1992). Attachment, individuation, and risk of suicide in late adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 357-373.
17.
Diehl, M. , Elnick, A. B., Bourbeau, L. S., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (1998). Adult attachment styles: Their relations to family context and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1656-1669.
18.
DiTommaso, E. , & Spinner, B. (1997). Social and emotional loneliness: A re-examination of Weiss’ typology of loneliness. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 417-427.
19.
Feeney, J. , & Noller, P. (1996). Adult attachment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Gross, A. E. , & McMullen, P. A. (1983). Models of the help-seeking process. In B. M. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping (Vol. 2, pp. 47-70). New York: Academic Press.
21.
Hamid, N. P. (1989). Contact and intimacy patterns of lonely students. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 18, 84-86.
22.
Hartshorne, T. S. (1993). Psychometric properties and confirmatory analysis of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 182-195.
23.
Hazan, C. , & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Deeper into attachment theory. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 68-79.
24.
Hecht, D. T. , & Baum, S. K. (1984). Loneliness and attachment patterns in young adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 193-197.
25.
Hojat, M. (1998). Satisfaction with early relationships with parents and psychosocial attributes in adulthood: Which parent contributes more?Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 203-220.
26.
Kraus, L. A. , Davis, M. H., Bazzini, D. G., Church, M., & Kirchman, C. M. (1993). Personal and social influences on loneliness: The mediating effect of social provisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 37-53.
27.
Labouvie-Vief, G. (1994). Psyche and eros: Mind and gender in the life course. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Larose, S. , & Boivin, M. (1998). Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5, 1-27.
29.
Larose, S. , & Roy, R. (1995). Test of Reactions and Adaptation in College (TRAC): A new measure of learning propensity for college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 293-306.
30.
Levin, I. , & Stokes, J. P. (1986). An examination of the relation of individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality, 54, 717-733.
31.
Levy, K. N. , Blatt, S. J., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment styles and parental representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 407-419.
32.
Marangoni, C. , & Ickes, W. (1989). Loneliness: A theoretical review with implications for measurement. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 93-128.
33.
Mikulincer, M. (1997). Adult attachment style and information processing: Individual differences in curiosity and cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1217-1230.
34.
Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209-1224.
35.
Pascarella, E. T. , & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Pearlin, L. I. , & McCall, M. E. (1990). Occupational stress and marital support: A description of microprocesses. In J. Eckenrode & S. Gore (Eds.), Stress between work and family. New York: Plenum.
37.
Peplau, L. A. (1985). Loneliness research: Basic concepts and findings. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 269-286). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
38.
Peplau, L. , & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research, and therapy (pp. 1-18). New York: John Wiley.
39.
Perl, H. I. , & Trickett, E. J. (1988). Social network formation of college freshmen: Personal and environmental determinants. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 207-224.
40.
Perlman, D. (1988). Loneliness: A life-span, family perspective. In R. M. Milardo (Ed.), Families and social networks: New perspectives on family (pp. 190-220). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Pierce, G. R. , Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support: Are two constructs better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 1028-1039.
42.
Russell, D. , Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
43.
Sarason, B. R. , Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. (1997). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 547-573). New York: John Wiley.
44.
Shaver, P. R. , Collins, N., & Clark, C. L. (1996). Attachment styles and internal working models of self and relationship partners. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 25-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Shaver, P. , Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Transition to college: Network changes, social skills, and loneliness. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 193-219). London: Sage Ltd.
46.
Smith, M. , & Knowles, A. D. (1991). Contributions of personality, social network, and cognitive processes to the experience of loneliness in women religious and other mature Australian women. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 355-365.
47.
Stokes, I. , & Levin, J. P. (1986). Gender differences in predicting loneliness from social network characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1069-1074.
48.
Stroebe, W. , Stroebe, M., Abakoumkin, G., & Schut, H. (1996). The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1241-1249.
49.
Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Vaux, A. (1988). Social and personal factors in loneliness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 462-471.
51.
Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Weiss, R. S. (1974). The provisions of social relationships. In Z. Rubin (Ed.), Doing unto others (pp. 17-26). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
