This study was conducted to explore the culture-specific roles of emotion, relationship quality, and self-esteem in determining life satisfaction. It was hypothesized that maintaining good interpersonal relationships would make individuals in collectivistic cultures not only feel good about their lives but also feel better about themselves. Furthermore, two emotion variables—emotional expression and emotion differentiation—were proposed as possible determinants of relationship quality. It was hypothesized that emotional expressiveness would be more important for maintaining good interpersonal relationships in individualistic societies but emotion differentiation would be more important in collectivistic cultures. These hypotheses were tested with Euro-American, Asian American, Korean, and Chinese groups using multigroup analyses in a structural equation model. Results supported all proposed hypotheses and indicated that emotion differentiation contributes to maintaining good interpersonal relationships in collectivistic cultures, which contributes to self-esteem and satisfaction with life.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, A., & Aron, E. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological perspective (pp. 325-344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bagozzi, R. P., Wong, N., & Yi, Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognitive and Emotion, 13, 641-672.
3.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy: Mechanism in human agency. American Psychologists, 37, 122-147.
4.
Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Benet-Martínez, V., & Karakitapoglu-Aygün, Z. (2003). The interplay of cultural syndromes and personality in predicting life satisfaction: Comparing Asian Americans and European Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 38-60.
6.
Briggs, J. L. (1970). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Brown, J. D. (1993). Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 27-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Brown, J. D., & Marshall, M. A. (2001). Self-esteem and emotion: Some thoughts about feelings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 575-584.
10.
Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford.
11.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197-229.
12.
De Rivera, J. (1984). Development and the full range of emotional experience. In C. Z. Malatesta &C. E. Izard (Eds.), Emotion in adult development (pp. 45-64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851-864.
14.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
15.
Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41-78.
16.
Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). National differences in subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 213-229). New York: Russell Sage.
17.
Diener, E., Suh, E., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Social Indicator Research, 34, 7-32.
18.
Dunn, G., Everitt, B., & Pickles, A. (1993). Modeling covariances and latent variables using EQS. New York: Chapman & Hall.
19.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
20.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Endo, Y., Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (2000). Culture and positive illusions in close relationships: How my relationships are better than yours. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1571-1586.
22.
Feldman, L. A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 153-166.
23.
Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967-984.
24.
Izard, C. E. (1991). The psychology of emotions. New York: Plenum.
25.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
26.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.3: Structural equation modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
27.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1995). Is psychology relevant to global human development issues? American Psychologists, 50, 293-300.
28.
Kang, S. (2003). [Correlates of emotional complexity]. Unpublished raw data, University of Notre Dame.
29.
Kang, S., & Shaver, P. R. (in press). Individual differences in emotional complexity: Their psychological implications. Journal of Personality.
30.
King, L. A., & Emmons, R. A. (1990). Conflict over emotional expression: Psychological and physical correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 864-877.
31.
Kishton, J., & Widaman, K. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.
32.
Kitayama, S., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Yin and yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 242-302). New York: Guilford.
33.
Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Kurokawa, M. (2000). Culture, emotion, and well-being: Good feelings in Japan and the United States. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 93-124.
34.
Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
35.
Leary, M. R. (2002). When selves collide: The nature of the self and the dynamics of interpersonal relationships. In A. Tesser, D. A. Stapel, & J. V. Wood (Eds.), Self and motivation (pp. 119-146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123-144). New York: Plenum.
38.
Levy, R. I. (1973). Tahitians: Mind and experiences in the Society Islands. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Lutz, C. (1987). Goals, events and understanding in Ifaluk emotion theory. In N. Guinne & D. Hoalland (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 290-312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
41.
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotion: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 197-204.
42.
Michalos, A. C. (1991). Global report of student well-being. New York: Springer.
43.
Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10-19.
44.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3-72.
45.
Planalp, S. (1999). Communicating emotion: Social, moral, and cultural processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., &Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality correlates of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 463-482.
47.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
48.
Russell, J. A. (1995). Facial expressions of emotion: What lies beyond minimal universality? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 379-391.
49.
Saarni, C. (1997). Emotional competence and self-regulation in childhood. In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 35-66). New York: Basic Books.
50.
Schimmack, U., Radhakrishnan, P., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582-593.
51.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
52.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
53.
Uchida, Y., Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Reyes, J. (2001, June). Interpersonal sources of happiness: The relative significance in the U.S., the Philippines, and Japan. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Psychological Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
54.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 463-490.
55.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
56.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.
