Research showing that rape myth acceptance (RMA) causally affects rape proclivity (RP) was extended by examining the impact of RMA-related norms on RP. Male students (total N = 264) received feedback about the alleged responses of other students to RMAitems either before (Experiment 1) or after (Experiment 2) they reported their own RMA, and then their RP was assessed using acquaintance-rape scenarios. The level of RMA feedback was varied. Results showed that higher norms led to higher RP. In Experiment 1, this effect was mediated via selfreported RMA. Experiment 2 yielded main effects of both RMA feedback and self-reported RMA and an interaction effect showing that RMA feedback was particularly influential at higher levels of own RMA. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Abrams, D., Viki, G. T. N., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111-125.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Bechhofer, L., & Parrot, A. (1991). What is acquaintance rape? In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime(pp. 9-25) New York: John Wiley.
5.
Bettencourt, B. A., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., & Mulholland, A. (1997). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275.
6.
Bohner, G. (1998). Vergewaltigungsmythen: Sozialpsychologische Untersuchungen über täterentlastende und opferfeindliche Überzeugungen im Bereich sexueller Gewalt[Rapemyths: Social psychological studies on beliefs that exonerate the assailant and blame the victim of sexual violence]. Landau, Germany: Verlag Empirische Pädagogik.
7.
Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (in press). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology.
8.
Bohner, G., Reinhard, M.-A., Rutz, S., Sturm, S., Kerschbaum, B., & Effler, D. (1998). Rapemyths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 257-268.
9.
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Simon& Schuster.
10.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Culturalmyths and supports of rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
11.
Buss, D. M., & Malamuth, N. (Eds.). (1996). Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.
13.
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology(4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 151-192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Costin, F. (1985). Beliefs about rape and women's social roles. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 319-325.
16.
Epps, K. J., Haworth, R., & Swaffer, T. (1993). Attitudes toward women and rape amongmale adolescents convicted of sexual versus nonsexual crimes. Journal of Psychology, 127, 501-506.
17.
Feild, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 166-179.
18.
Furr, R. M. (2004). Interpreting effect sizes in contrast analysis. Understanding Statistics, 3, 1-25.
19.
Kallgren, C. A., Reno, R. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002-1012.
20.
Koralewski, M. A., & Conger, J. C. (1992). The assessment of social skills among sexually coercive college males. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 169-188.
21.
Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133-164.
22.
Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 138-157.
23.
Malamuth, N. M. (1989a). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26-49.
24.
Malamuth, N. M. (1989b). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part two. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 324-354.
25.
Malamuth, N. M. (1998). An evolutionary-based model integrating research on the characteristics of sexually coercive men. In J. G. Adair, D. Bélanger,& K. L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science. Vol. 1: Social, personal, and cultural aspects(pp. 151-184). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
26.
Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299-320.
27.
Michaelis, U., & Bohner, G. (2005, July 19-23). Sexism as a social norm for judgments of rape proclivity and victim blame. In G. Bohner & B. Krahé (Chairs), Social cognitions about sexual violence. Symposium held at the 14th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Würzburg, Germany.
28.
Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150-163.
29.
Murnen, S. K., Wright, C., & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If “boys will be boys,” then girls will be victims? A meta-analytic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359-375.
30.
Overholser, J. C., & Beck, S. (1986). Multimethod assessment of rapists, child molesters, and three control groups on behavioral and psychological measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 682-687.
31.
Pepitone, A. (1976). Toward a normative and comparative biocultural social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 641-653.
32.
Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001, March). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests[Computer software]. Available from http://www.unc.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
33.
Quackenbush, R. L. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed, and undifferentiated males on dimensions of attitudes toward rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 318-342.
34.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
Schaffer, L. S. (1983). Toward Pepitone's vision of a normative social psychology: What is a social norm?Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4, 275-294.
36.
Schwarz, N.,& Strack, F. (1981). Manipulating salience: Causal assessment in natural settings. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 554-558.
37.
Schwendinger, J. R., & Schwendinger, H. (1974). Rape myths: In legal, theoretical, and everyday practice. Crime and Social Justice, 1, 18-26.
38.
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Weidner, R., Hippler, G.,& Schwarz, R. (1983). Politische Einschüchterung als sozialpsychologisches Problem [Political intimidation as a problem for social psychology]. In J. Haisch (Ed.), Angewandte Sozialpsychologie Applied social psychology]. Bern, Germany: Huber.
39.
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitudebehavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
40.
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225-244.
41.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
