Recent research has documented the intergroup sensitivity effect (ISE) whereby people respond more favorably to internal versus external criticism of their group. The present studies examine the reactions of bystanders who do not belong to the criticized group and whose reactions are therefore more likely to be informed by social conventions than by defensiveness. Studies 1 and 2 presented British participants with criticisms of Australians, manipulating their ostensible source. These British bystanders exhibited the ISE, responding more favorably to the speaker and comments when the critic was Australian rather than non-Australian. These responses were driven by the perceived motives of speakers rather than their level of experience with the group (Study 2). Study 3 provides direct evidence that internal criticism is more conventionally acceptable than is external criticism.
Baron, R. A. (1993). Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management. Series in applied psychology(pp. 155-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Bourhis, R., Giles, H., Leyens, J. P., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Psycholinguistic distinctiveness: Language divergence in Belgium. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology(pp. 158-185). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4.
Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1985). The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behaviours. Annual Review of Psychology, 11, 219-243.
5.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003). A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 414-446.
7.
Crandall, C. S., Eshleman, A., & O'Brien, L. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359-378.
8.
Douglas, K. M., & McGarty, C. (2001). Identifiability and selfpresentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 399-416.
9.
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2003). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 684-696.
10.
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (in press). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers’ attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
11.
Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: Norton.
12.
Elder, T. J., Douglas, K. M.,& Sutton, R. M. (in press). Perceptions of social influence whenmessages favour “us” versus “them”: Acloser look at the social distance effect. European Journal of Social Psychology.
13.
Elder, T. J., Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticisms of the ingroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 231-244.
14.
Franco, F. M., & Maass, A. (1999). Intentional control over prejudice: When the choice of themeasurematters. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 269-477.
15.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995) The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
16.
Goffman, I. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
17.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language(pp. 58-90). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Hornsey, M. J. (2003). Linking superiority bias in the interpersonal and intergroupdomains. Journal of Social Psychology, 143, 479-491.
20.
Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: A social identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383.
21.
Hornsey, M. J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). “It's OK if we say it, but you can't”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
22.
Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). “You can criticize because you care”: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 499-518.
23.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Jones, E. E., Hester, S. L., Farina, A.,& Davis, K. E. (1959) Reactions to unfavorable personal evaluations as a function of the evaluator's perceived adjustment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 63-370.
25.
Kaplan, L. V. (2001). Intentional agency, responsibility, and justice. B. F. Malle, L. J. Moses, & D. A. Baldwin (Eds.), Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition(pp. 367-379). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
27.
Lakoff, R. (1974). What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics and performatives. Berkeley Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 1, 1-55.
28.
Leung, K., Su, S., & Morris, M. W. (2001). When is criticism not constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations, 54, 1155-1187.
29.
Leyens, J.-P, Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Schadron, G. (1992). Stereotypes and social judgability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology(Vol. 3, pp. 91-120). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30.
Lyons, A., & Kashima, Y. (2003). How are stereotypes maintained through communication? The influence of stereotype sharedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 989-1005.
31.
Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 79-121.
32.
Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995). Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 116-126.
33.
Mae, L., & Carlston, D. E. (2005). Hoist on your own petard: When prejudiced remarks are recognized and backfire on speakers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 240-255.
34.
McClure, J. L. (1998). Discounting causes of behavior. Are two reasons better than one?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 7-20.
35.
Nemeth, C., & Owens, P. (1996). Making workgroups more effective: The value ofminority dissent. InM. A. West (Ed.), The handbook of workgroup psychology(pp. 125-121). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
36.
O'Dwyer, A., Berkowitz, N. H., & Alfeld-Johnson, D. (2002). Group and person attributions in response to criticism of the ingroup. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 563-588.
37.
Reeder, G. D., Kumar, S., Hesson-McInnis, M.,& Trafimow, D. (2002). Inferences about the morality of an aggressor: The role of perceived motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 789-803.
38.
Rucker, D. D., Polifronti, M., Tetlock, P. E., & Scott, A. L. (2004). On the assignment of punishment: The impact of general-societal threat and the moderating role of severity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 673-684.
39.
Schaller, M., Conway, L. G., III, & Tanchuck, T. L. (2002). Selective pressures on the once and future contents of ethnic stereotypes: Effects of the communicability of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 861-877.
40.
Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., Elder, T. J., & Tarrant, M. (in press). Social identity and social convention in response to criticism of groups. In Y. Kashima, K. Fiedler, & P. Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: Language-based approaches to stereotype formation, maintenance, and transformation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Sutton, R. M., & McClure, J. L. (2001). Covariational influences on goal-based explanation: An integrative model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 222-236.
42.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel& W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations(2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
43.
Van Vugt, M., & Hart, C. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 585-598.
44.
Vivian, J. E., & Berkowitz, N. H. (1993). Anticipated outgroup evaluations and intergroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 513-524.
45.
Wedekind, C., & Milinski, M. (2000). Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science, 288, 850-852.
46.
Yzerbyt, V., Schadron, G., Leyens, J. P., & Rocher, S. (1994). Social judgability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55.
