Increasing Acquaintanceship and Complementarity of Behavioral Styles and Personality Traits Among College Roommates

Abstract

Robert Carson's principle of complementarity asserts that the behavioral styles of interaction partners tend to complement each other by encouraging individuals to act opposite in terms of dominance and similar in terms of warmth. The principles of complementarity further hypothesize that as relationships progress through multiple interactions, the behavioral styles of its members will be altered to increase complementarity. To examine this acquaintanceship hypothesis, the behavioral styles and personalities of 102 college roommate dyads were assessed after living together for 2 weeks and again after living together for 15 weeks. Consistent with the acquaintanceship hypothesis, after 2 weeks the behavioral styles of roommates did not complement each other; however, after 15 weeks, the behavioral styles of roommates strongly complemented each other. In contrast to the change in complementarity observed in roommates' behavioral styles, participants' perceptions of their own personalities were relatively unaffected by the personalities of their roommates.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acton, G. S., & Revelle, W. (2002). Interpersonal personality measures show circumplex structure based on new psychometric criteria. Journal of Personality Assessment 79, 456-481.

Bluhm, C., Widiger, T. A., & Miele, G. M. (1990). Interpersonal complementarity and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58, 464-471.

Carson, R. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.

Funder, D. C., & Sneed, C. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64, 479-490.

Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin 118, 430-439.

Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin 102, 172-178.

John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality 61, 521-551.

Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review 90, 185-214.

Kurtz, J. E., Lee, P. A., & Sherker, J. L. (1999). Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. Assessment 6, 103-113.

10.

Leary, T. (1957). The interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Roland.

11.

Markey, P. M., Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2003). Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29, 1082-1090.

12.

Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., & Tinsley, B. J. (2004). Children's behavioral manifestations of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30, 423-432.

13.

Markey, P. M., Markey, C. M., & Tinsley, B. (2005). Applying the interpersonal circumplex to children's behavior: Parent-child interactions and risk behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, 549-559.

14.

McLeod, M., & Nowicki, S. (1985). Cooperative behavior as a function of interpersonal style in preschoolers. Journal of Personality 53, 36-45.

15.

Nowicki, S., & Manheim, S. (1991). Interpersonal complementarity and time of interaction in female relationships. Journal of Research in Personality 25, 322-333.

16.

O'Connor, B. P., & Dyce, J. (1997). Interpersonal rigidity, hostility, and complementarity in musical bands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, 362-372.

17.

Rounds, J., Tracey, T. J., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interests structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior 40, 239-259.

18.

Sadler, P., & Woody, E. (2003). Is who you are who you're talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 80-96.

19.

Strong, S. R., Hills, H., Kilmartin, C. T., DeVries, H., Lamer, K., Nelson, B. N., et al. (1988). The dynamic relations among interpersonal behaviors: A test of complementarity and anticomplementarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 798-810.

20.

Tracey, T. J. (1994). An examination of complementarity of interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 864-878.

21.

Tracey, T. J. (2004). Levels of interpersonal complementarity: A simplex representation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30, 1211-1225.

22.

Tracey, T. J. G., Ryan, M., & Jaschik-Herman, B. (2001). Complementarity of interpersonal circumplex traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 786-797.

23.

Wiggins, J. S. (1995). Interpersonal Adjective Scales professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

24.

Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., & Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research 23, 517-530.

25.

Yaughn, E., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (1999). Close relationships and complementary interpersonal styles among men and women. Journal of Social Psychology 139, 473-478.