Social comparison theories typically imply a comparable degree of competition between commensurate rivals who are competing on a mutually important dimension. However, the present analysis reveals that the degree of competition between such rivals depends on their proximity to a meaningful standard. Studies 1 to 3 test the prediction that individuals become more competitive and less willing to maximize profitable joint gains when they and their commensurate rivals are highly ranked (e.g., #2 vs. #3) than when they are not (e.g., #202 vs. #203). Studies 4 to 6 then generalize these findings, showing that the degree of competition also increases in the proximity of other meaningful standards, such as the bottom of a ranking scale or a qualitative threshold in the middle of a scale. Studies 7 and 8 further examine the psychological processes underlying this phenomenon and reveal that proximity to a standard exerts a direct impact on the basic unidirectional drive upward, beyond the established effects of commensurability and dimension relevance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. (2000). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Axelrod, R., & Dion, D. (1988). The further evolution of cooperation. Science, 242, 1385-1390.
3.
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G. F., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly37, 220-240.
4.
Bazerman, M. H., Schroth, H. A., Shah, P. P., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. (1994). The inconsistent role of comparison others and procedural justice in reactions to hypothetical job descriptions: Implications for job acceptance decisions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes60, 326-352.
5.
Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science4, 39-43.
6.
Beach, S. R. H., & Tesser, A. (2000). Self-evaluation maintenance and evolution: Some speculative notes. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1999). Testing critical properties of decision making on the Internet. Psychological Science, 10, 399-407.
8.
Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Inconsistencies in valuing comparative pay-offs: Implications for bargaining and trade. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations, 891, 1-14.
9.
Brickman, P. (1975). Adaptation level determinants of satisfaction with equal and unequal outcome distributions in skill and chance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 191-198.
10.
Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. J. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
11.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Camerer, C. (1995). Individual decision making. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894-908.
14.
Festinger, L. (1942). Wish, expectations, and group standards as factors influencing level of aspiration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 37, 184-200.
15.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16.
Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., Bazerman, M. H., & Miller, D. T. (2005). Profit versus disadvantageous inequality: The impact of self-categorization. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 187-198.
17.
Goethals, G. R. (1986). Social comparison theory: Psychology from the lost and found. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 12, 261-278.
18.
Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison process: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
19.
Hoffman, P. J., Festinger, L., & Lawrence, D. H. (1954). Tendencies toward group comparability in competitive bargaining. Human Relations7, 141-159.
20.
Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G. F., Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin125, 576-590.
21.
Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (1995). The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Kahneman, D. (2000). Preface. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Liang, K. Y., & Zeger, S. L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22.
25.
Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medal-ists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
26.
Messick, D. M., & Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418-434.
27.
Messick, D. M., & Thorngate, W. B. (1967). Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology3, 85-101.
28.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161-176.
29.
Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418.
30.
Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
32.
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1993). The structure of counterfactual thought. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 312-319.
33.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Smith, R. H., & Insko, C. A. (1987). Social comparison choice during ability evaluation: The effects of comparison publicity, performance feedback, and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 111-122.
35.
Stanne, M. B., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 133-154.
36.
Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (2000). A selective history of classic and neo-social comparison theory. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic.
37.
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 193-355). New York: Academic Press.
38.
Tesser, A., Felson, R., & Suls, J. (2000). Psychological perspectives on self and identity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping: You don't always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 582-590.
40.
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology9, 187-204.
41.
Volkmann, J. (1936). The anchoring of absolute scales. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 742-743.
42.
Wheeler, L. (1966). Toward a theory of behavioral contagion. Psychological Review, 73, 179-192.
43.
Wheeler, L. (2000). Individual differences in social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. New York: Kluwer Academic.
44.
Whittemore, I. C. (1924). The influence of competition on performance: An experimental study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 19, 236-254.
45.
Whittemore, I. C. (1925). The competitive consciousness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20, 17-33.
46.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.
