Three studies examined non-Aboriginal Australians’ guilt and anger about their ingroup’s advantage over structurally disadvantaged Aborigines. Study 1 showed that participants who perceived their ingroup as relatively advantaged perceived this inequality as unfair and felt guilt and anger about it. Anger, and to a lesser degree guilt, predicted the willingness to engage in political action regarding ingroup advantage. Study 2 showed both guilt and anger to be relatively self-focused because both were associated with appraising the ingroup’s (rather than the government’s) discrimination as responsible for ingroup advantage. Study 3 examined on participants especially willing to engage in political action to bring about systemic compensation to Aborigines. Anger about ingroup advantage was a potent predictor. Although guilt was associated with the abstract goal of systemic compensation, guilt did not explain willingness for political action. Results underline the importance of examining specific group-based emotions in intergroup relations.
AC Nielsen. (2000). Issues report. Sydney, Australia: Author.
2.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1996).Census of population and housing: Selected social and housing characteristics for statistical local areas, Western Australia Cocos (Keeling) and Christmas Islands (Catalogue #2015.5). Canberra, Australia: Author.
4.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
5.
Brady, H. E. (1993). Political participation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes(pp. 737-801). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Broome, R. (2002).Aboriginal Australians: Black responses to White dominance,1788-2001 (3rd ed.). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
7.
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
8.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
9.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Shure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
10.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1998). Implementation willingness: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
11.
Iyer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2006). The politics of emotion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
13.
Leach, C. W. (2006). The meaning of prejudice. Unpublished manuscript, University of California.
14.
Leach, C. W., Iyer. A., & Pedersen, A. (in press). Angry opposition to government redress: When the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived. British Journal of Social Psychology.
15.
Leach, C. W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration(pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Lecouteur, A., & Augoustinos, M. (2001). Apologising to the stolen generations: Argument, rhetoric, and identity in public reasoning. Australian Psychologist, 36, 51-61.
17.
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C. W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A. M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659-680.
18.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
19.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Pedersen, A., Beven, J., Walker, I., & Griffiths, B. (2004). Attitudes toward indigenous Australians: The role of empathy and guilt. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 233-249.
21.
Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508-521.
22.
Roseman, I. J., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-221.
23.
Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Montada, L., Muller, L., & Muller Fohrbrodt, G. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and education as privileges: Exploring the generalizability of the existential guilt reaction. Social Justice Research, 13, 313-337.
24.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic prejudice. In P. Katz & D. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating prejudice: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53-84). New York: Plenum.
25.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward a new conceptualization of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
Swim, J. K., & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes towards affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 500-514.
28.
Tangney, J. P., Hill-Barlow, D., Wagner, P. E., Marschall, D. E., Borenstein, J. K., Sanftner, J., et al. (1996). Assessing individual differences in constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 780-796.
29.
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 1256-1269.
30.
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P. E., Hill-Barlow, D., Marschall, D. E., & Gramzow, R. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 797-809.
31.
Tiedens, L. Z., & Leach, C. W. (Eds.). (2004). The social life of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
33.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (6), 1063-1074.
34.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Defining emotion concepts. Cognitive Science, 16, 539-581.
