The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2007
The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations?
Two studies show that initial expectancies influence the way people respond toward task-related differences (i.e., in work goals or work styles) between the self and a collaboration partner. When no advance information is available, participants expect their partner to be similar to themselves in task-related aspects. However, when people expect their partner to have a different work goal (Study 1) or work style (Study 2), and this actually is the case, disappointment is reduced and commitment toward future collaboration is increased. Initial expectations are important because these help people develop a clear picture of their partner. When initial expectations are violated, people conceive the other less clearly and this is part of the reason they report lower levels of commitment.
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Nijstad, B.A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.
2.
Bargh, J.A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition (pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Baker, S.M., & Petty, R.E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrunity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4.
Baron, R.S., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Bettencourt, B.A., Dill, K.E., Greathouse, S., Charlton, K., & Mulholland, A. (1996). Evaluations of ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 244-275.
6.
Burgoon, J.K., LePoire, B.A., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Effects of pre-interaction expectancies and target communication on perceiver reciprocity and compensation in dyadic interaction . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 287-321.
7.
Choi, H.S., & Levine, J.M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
8.
Cummings, J.N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50, 352-364.
9.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & West, M.A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology , 88, 1191-1201.
10.
De Vries, N.K. (1988). Gelijkheid en complementariteit. Vergelijkingsprocessen in tweedimensionale taaksituaties [Similarity and complementarity. Comparison processes in two-dimensional task situations]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
11.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labour in society. London: Macmillan. (Original work published in 1893)
12.
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S.A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 459-478.
13.
Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Van den Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717-730.
14.
Ellemers, N., Kortekaas P., & Ouwerkerk, J.W. (1999). Self-categorization, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.
15.
Ellemers, N., & Rink, F. (2005). Identity in work groups: The beneficial and detrimental consequences of multiple identities and group norms for collaboration and group performance. Advances in Group Processes, 22, 1-41.
16.
Harrison, D.A., & Klein, K.J. (in press). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review.
17.
Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., Gavin, J.H., & Florey, A.T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
18.
Haslam, S.A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
19.
Haslam, S.A., Eggins, R.A., & Reynolds, K.J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83-113.
20.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley
21.
Hornsey, M.J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264.
22.
Jackson, L.A., Sullivan, L.A., & Hodge, C.N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84.
23.
Jehn, M.A., & Mannix, E.A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
24.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 741-763.
25.
Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B.J. (2002). We're all individuals: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
26.
Jones, P.E. (2004). False consensus in social context: Differential projection and perceived social distance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 417-429.
27.
Kernahan, C., Bartholow, B.D., & Bettencourt, B.A. (2000). Effects of category-based expectancy violation on affect-related evaluations: Towards a comprehensive model. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 85-100.
28.
Mikula, G., Scherer, K.R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
29.
Miller, D.T., Visser, P.S., & Staub, B.D. (2005). How surveillance begets perceptions of dishonesty: The case of the counterfactual sinner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 117-128.
30.
Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Xin, K.R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 1-28.
31.
Phillips, K.W. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
32.
Phillips, K.W., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., & Gruenfeld, D.A. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497-510.
33.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
34.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A.T., & Novak, R.J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
35.
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2006). What can you expect? The influence of gender diversity in dyads on work goal expectancies and subsequent work commitment. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 577-588.
36.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176-179.
37.
Ross, L., Green, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
38.
Skowronski, J.J., Carlston, D.E., & Isham, J.T. (1993). Implicit versus explicit impression formation: The differing effects of overt labelling and covert priming on memory and impressions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 17-41.
39.
Snyder, M., & Stukas, A.A. (1999). Interpersonal processes: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and behavioral activities in social interaction. Annual Review ofPsychology, 50, 273-303.
40.
Thomas-Hunt, M.C., & Phillips, K.W. (2004). When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1585-1598.
41.
Van Dijk, W.W., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). What do we talk about when we talk about disappointment? Distinguishing outcome-related disappointment from person-related disappointment. Cognition and Emotion , 16, 787-807.
42.
Van Dijk, W.W., Zeelenberg, M., & van der Pligt, J. (2003). Blessed are those who expect nothing: Lowering expectations as a way of avoiding disappointment . Journal of Economic Psychology, 24, 505-516.
43.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Homan, A.C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
44.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
45.
Williams, K.Y., & O'Reilly, C.A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 77-140.
46.
Wittenbaum, G.M., Hollingshead, A.B., & Botero, I.C. (2004). From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs, 71, 286-310.
