Three experiments examine the extent to which newcomers are able to influence their groups relative to old-timers. Specifically, how group members respond to criticisms of their group was assessed as a function of the intragroup position of the speaker. When criticizing their workplace (Experiment 1; N = 116), their profession (Experiment 2; N = 106), or an Internet community (Experiment 3; N = 189), newcomers aroused more resistance than old-timers, an effect that was mediated by perceptions of how attached critics were to their group identity. Experiment 3 also showed that newcomers could reduce resistance to their criticisms by distancing themselves from a group of which they were previously members. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Alvaro, E.M., & Crano, W.D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counterargumentation. Journal of Personality and SoialPsychology, 72, 949-964.
2.
Bauer, T.N., Morrison, E.W., & Callister, R.R. (1998). Organizational socialization: A review and directions for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 16, pp. 149-214). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
3.
Brewer, M.B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust . In M. B. Brewer & B. E. Collins (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345-360). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Choi, H-S., & Levine, J.M. (2004). Minority influence in work teams: The impact of newcomers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 273-280.
5.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
6.
Elder, T.J., Sutton, R.M., & Douglas, K.M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticism of the ingroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 231-244.
7.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 617-626.
8.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
9.
Gruenfeld, D.H., & Fan, E.T. (1999). What newcomers see and what old-timers say: Discontinuities in knowledge exchange. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 245-265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
10.
Haunschild, P.R., Moreland, R.L., & Murrell, A.J. (1994). Sources of resistance to mergers between groups . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1150-1178.
Hollander, E.P. (1960). Competence and conformity in the acceptance of influence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 365-369.
13.
Hornsey, M.J. (2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 301-334). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
14.
Hornsey, M.J. (2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups . In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp.74-91). London: Sage.
15.
Hornsey, M.J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383.
16.
Hornsey, M.J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. (2002). “It's ok if we say it, but you can't”: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
17.
Hornsey, M.J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). “You can criticize because you care”: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect . European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 499-518.
18.
Insko, C.A., Schopler, J., Hoyle, R.H., Dardis, G.J., & Graetz, K.A. (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 58, 68-79.
19.
Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
20.
Jetten, J., Duck, J., Terry, D.J., & O'Brien, A. (2002). Being attuned to intergroup differences in mergers: The role of aligned leaders and low-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1194-1201.
21.
Jetten, J., Hornsey, M.J., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (2006). When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 162-173.
22.
Jetten, J., O'Brien, A., & Trindall, N. (2002). Changing identity: Predicting adjustment to organizational restructure as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identification . British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 281-298.
23.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Marques, J.M., & Paez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37-68.
25.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 137-192.
26.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (1989). Newcomers and old-timers in small groups. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 143-186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (2002). Socialization and trust in work groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 5, 185-201.
28.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 202-239). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Reicher, S.D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena . European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161-198.
30.
Ridgeway, C.L. (1981). Nonconformity, competence, and influence in groups: A test of two theories. American Sociological Review, 46, 333-347.
31.
Ridgeway, C.L., & Jacobson, C.K. (1977). Sources of status and influence in all-female and mixed-sex groups. Sociological Quarterly , 18, 413-425.
32.
Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1074-1086.
33.
Sunstein, C.R. (2003). Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Sutton, R.M., Elder, T.J., & Douglas, K.M. (2006). Reactions to internal and external criticism of outgroups: Social convention in the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 563-575.
35.
Van Kleef, G.A., Steinel, W., Van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M.A., & Svensson, A. (in press). Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation: How one's standing in the group affects negotiation behavior. British Journal of Social Psychology.
36.
Wahrman, R., & Pugh, M.D. (1972). Competence and conformity: Another look at Hollander's study. Sociometry, 35, 376-386.
37.
Wahrman, R., & Pugh, M.D. (1974). Sex, nonconformity and influence. Sociometry, 37, 137-147.
38.
Ziller, R., & Behringer, R.D. (1960). Assimilation of the knowledgeable newcomer under conditions of group success and failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 288-292.
