Three studies investigated the process by which categorical and individuating information impacts impression formation. The authors assumed that (a) both types of information are functionally equivalent in serving as evidence for interpersonal judgments and (b) their use is determined by their accessibility and perceived applicability to the impression's target. The first study constituted an extended replication of Pavelchak's experiment, and it showed that its results, initially interpreted to suggest the primacy in impression formation of category over trait information, may have been prompted by differential accessibility of the category versus trait information in some experimental conditions of the original research. Studies 2 and 3 additionally explored the role of informational accessibility manipulated in different ways. Study 3 demonstrated also that the effect of accessibility is qualified by the information's apparent relevance to the judgmental target.
Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2.
Bargh, J.A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York: Guilford.
3.
Bargh, J.A., & Chartrand, T.L. (2000). The mind in the middle. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 253-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Beckett, N.E., & Park, B. (1995). Use of category versus individuating information: Making base rates salient. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 21-31.
5.
Blair, I.V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(3), 242-261.
6.
Bless, H., Schwarz, N., & Wieland, R. (1996). Mood and the impact of category membership and individuating information. European Journal of Social Psychology , 26(6), 935-959.
7.
Brewer, M.B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Brewer, M.B., & Harasty Feinstein, A.S. (1999). Dual processes in the cognitive representations of persons and social categories. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 255-270). New York: Guilford.
9.
Bruner, J.S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies on the psychology of knowing. Oxford, UK: Norton.
10.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.) (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford .
11.
Davies, M.F. (1997). Belief persistence after evidential discrediting: The impact of generated versus provided explanations on the likelihood of discredited outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 33, 561-578.
12.
Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: The automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18.
13.
Draine, S.C., & Greenwald, A.G. (1998). Replicable unconscious semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 127(3), 287-303.
14.
Edwards, J.A., & Weary, G. (1993). Depression and the impression-formation continuum: Piecemeal processing despite the availability of the category information . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 636-645.
15.
Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 296-309.
16.
Fiske, S.T., Lin, M., & neuberg, S.L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
17.
Fiske, S.T., & Neuberg, S.L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., & Klauer, K.C. (2003). It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 16-30.
19.
Gilbert, D.T., & Hixon, J.G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 519-504.
20.
Greenwald, A.G. (1992). New look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766-779.
21.
Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
22.
Higgins, E.T., King, G.A., & Mavin, G.H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
23.
Jones, E.E., & Gerard, H.B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J.F., & Moll, J. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 871-888.
25.
Kruglanski, A.W., Erb, H.P., & Pierro, A. (2006). On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors. Psychological Inquiry, 17(3), 153-165.
26.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Orehek, E. (2007). Partitioning the domain of human inference: Dual mode and system models and their alternatives. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 291-316.
27.
Kruglanski, A.W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H.-P., & Chun, W.Y. (in press). On the parameters of social judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39).
28.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103(2), 284-308.
29.
Lepore, L., & Brown, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 275-287.
30.
Mussweiler, T., & Neumann, R. (2000). Sources of mental contamination: Comparing the effects of self-generated versus externally provided primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(2), 194-206.
31.
Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: Aselective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 136-164.
32.
Pavelchak, M.A. (1989). Piecemeal and category-based evaluation: An idiographic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 354-363.
33.
Shah, J.Y., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2003). When opportunity knocks: Bottom-up priming of goals by means and its effects on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1109-1122.
34.
Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (1999). Reactions to a Black professional. Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 885-904.
35.
Smith, E.R., Branscombe, N.R., & Bormann, C. (1988). Generality of the effects of practice on social judgment tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 54(3), 385-395.
36.
Srull, T.K., & Wyer, R.S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37, 1660-1672.
37.
Tagiuri, R., & Petrullo, L. (1958). Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
Uleman, J.S., Blader, S.L., & Todorov, A. (2005). Implicit impressions. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 362-392). New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J.S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(2), 237-252.
40.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J.S., & Cunniff, C. (1985). How automatic judgments are? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 904-917.
