The authors examined whether individual differences in social value orientation moderate responses to other's expressions of disappointment in negotiation. The literature suggested competing hypotheses: First, prosocials are more responsive to other's disappointment because they have a greater concern for other; second, proselfs are more responsive because they see other's disappointment as a threat to their own outcomes. Results of a computer-mediated negotiation in which a simulated opponent expressed disappointment, no emotion, or anger supported the second prediction: Proselfs conceded more to a disappointed opponent than to a neutral or angry one, whereas prosocials were unaffected by the other's emotion. This effect was mediated by participants' motivation to satisfy the other's needs, which disappointment triggered more strongly in proselfs than in prosocials. Implications for theorizing on emotion, social value orientation, and negotiation are discussed.
Barnett, M.A., King, L.W., & Howard, J.A. (1979). Inducing affect about self or other: Effects on generosity in children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 164-167.
2.
Barry, B. (1999). The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 7, 93-121.
3.
Batson, C.D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65-122). New York: Academic Press.
4.
Bell, D.E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty . Operations Research, 33, 1-27.
5.
Carnevale, P.J., & Probst, T.M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.
6.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
7.
De Cremer, D. (2002). The self-relevant implications of distribution rules: When self-esteem and acceptance are influenced by violations of the equity rule. Social Justice Research, 15, 327-339.
8.
De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, 5-18.
9.
De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology , 29, 871-893.
10.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & Boles, T.L. (1998). Share and share alike or winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 76, 253-276.
11.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Carnevale, P.J.D., Emans, B.J.M., & Van De Vliert, E. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 90-107.
12.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Kleef, G.A. (2004). The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 303-319.
13.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
14.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Miller, P.A., Fultz, J., Mathy, R.M., Shell, R., et al. (1989). The relations of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: A multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 55-66.
15.
Fabes, R.A., Eisenberg, N., Karbon, M., Troyer, D., & Switzer, G. (1994). The relations of children's emotion regulation to their vicarious emotional responses and comforting behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1678-1693.
16.
Friedman, R., Anderson, C., Brett, J., Olekalns, M., Goates, N., & Lisco, C.C. (2004). The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: Evidence from electronically mediated disputes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 369-376.
17.
Frijda, N.H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Frijda, N.H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. S. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Hilty, J.A., & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Black-hat/white-hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 444-469.
20.
Joireman, J., & Duell, B. (2005). Mother Teresa versus Ebenezer Scrooge: Mortality salience leads proselfs to endorse self-transcendent values (unless proselfs are reassured). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 31, 307-320.
21.
Kelley, H.H., & Stahelski, A.J. (1970). Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
22.
Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence . New York: Academic Press.
23.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 505-521.
24.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & A. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Ketelaar, T., & Au, W.T. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 429-453.
26.
Klapwijk A., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (2008). Shadow of the future: Psychological differences between single-trial and iterated social dilemmas. Unpublished manuscript, Free UniversityAmsterdam , Netherlands.
27.
Kopelman, S., Rosette, A.S., & Thompson, L.L. (2006). The three faces of eve: An examination of the strategic display of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 81-101.
28.
Kuhlman, D.M., Camac, C., & Cunha, D.A. (1986). Individual differences in social orientation. In H. Wilke, D. Messick, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 151-176). New York: Verlag Peter Lang.
29.
Kuhlman, D.M., & Marshello, A.F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 922-931.
30.
Lanzetta, J.T., & Englis, B.G. (1989). Expectations of cooperation and competition and their effects on observers' vicarious emotional responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 543-554.
31.
Liebrand, W.B.G., & Van Run, G. (1985). The effects of social motives across two cultures on behavior in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 86-102.
32.
McGrath, J.E., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues, and an agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
McClintock, C.G., & Liebrand, W.B.G. (1988). The role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation and other's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 396-409.
34.
McKersie, R.B., & Fonstad, N.O. (1997). Teaching negotiation theory and skills over the Internet. Negotiation Journal, 13, 363-368.
35.
Messick, D.M., & McClintock, C.G. (1968). Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 4, 1-25.
36.
Moore, D.A., Kurtzberg, T.R., Thompson, L.L., & Morris, M.W. (1999). Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affiliations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 22-43.
37.
Morris, M.W., & Keltner, D. (2000). How emotions work: An analysis of the social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-50.
38.
Olekalns, M., & Smith, P.L. (1999). Social value orientations and strategy choices in competitive negotiations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 657-668.
39.
Parkinson, B. (1996). Emotions are social. British Journal of Psychology, 87, 663-683.
40.
Parks, C.D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 431-438.
41.
Pruitt, D.G., & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict . Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
42.
Sattler, D.N., & Kerr, N.L. (1991). Might versus morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 756-765.
43.
Sinaceur, M., & Tiedens, L.Z. (2006). Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 314-322.
44.
Smith, C.A., Haynes, K.N., Lazarus, R.S., & Pope, L.K. (1993). In search of the "hot" cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916-929.
45.
Steinel, W., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2004). Social motives and strategic misrepresentation in social decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 419-434.
46.
Stouten, J., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2005). All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation . European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 767-783.
47.
Thompson, L., Valley, K.L., & Kramer, R.M. (1995). The bittersweet feeling of success: An examination of social perception in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 467-492.
48.
Timmers, M., Fischer, A.H., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1998). Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 974-985.
49.
Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. (2006). Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader-follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352-1361.
50.
Van Dijk, W.W., & Van der Pligt, J. (1997). The impact of probability and magnitude of outcome on disappointment and elation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 277-284.
51.
Van Kleef, G.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2002). Social value orientation and impression formation: A test of two competing hypotheses about information search in negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management , 13, 59-77.
52.
Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004a). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57-76.
53.
Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2004b). The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiation: A motivated information processing approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 510-528.
54.
Van Kleef, G.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2006). Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: The interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 124-142.
55.
Van Kleef, G.A., Steinel, W., Van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M., & Svensson, A. (2007). Group member prototypicality and inter-group negotiation: How one's standing in the group affects negotiation behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 129-154.
56.
Van Lange, P.A.M., Agnew, C.R., Harinck, F., & Steemers, G. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330-1344.
57.
Van Lange, P.A.M., Bekkers, R., Schuyt, T.h., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). From gaming to giving: Social value orientation predicts donating to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 375-384.
58.
Van Lange, P.A.M., De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E., & Van Vugt, M. (2007). Self-interest and beyond: Basic principles of social interaction. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 540-561). New York: Guilford.
59.
Van Lange, P.A.M., Otten, W., De Bruin, E.N.M., & Joireman, J.A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733-746.
60.
Van Lange, P.A.M., & Semin-Goossens, A. (1998). The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 847-854.
61.
Van Lange, P.A.M., & Visser, K. (1999). Locomotion in social dilemmas: How people adapt to cooperative, tit-for-tat, and noncooperative partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 762-773.
