Prior research shows that perceivers can judge some traits better than others in first impressions of targets. However, questions remain about which traits perceivers naturally do infer. Here, the authors develop an account of the “agreeableness asymmetry”: Although perceivers show little ability to accurately gauge target agreeableness in first impressions, they find that agreeableness is generally the most commonly inferred disposition among the Big Five dimensions of personality (agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, openness, and emotional stability). Using open-ended impressions based on photographs, videos, and face-to-face encounters, three studies show agreeableness as the most prevalently judged of the Big Five, although it is also poorly judged in both absolute and relative terms. The authors use interpersonal power to reveal an underlying mechanism. Manipulating the power of perceivers relative to targets substantially shifts impression content, suggesting that habitual interaction and relational concerns may partially explain perceiver's chronic interest in assessing agreeableness despite their limited ability to do so.
Ames, D.R., Bianchi, E.C., & Magee, J.C. (2008). Professed impressions: What speakers say about others affects onlookers' perceptions of speakers' power and warmth. Manuscript in preparation.
2.
Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A.D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking . European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511-536.
3.
Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
4.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 62, 645-657.
5.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1-25.
6.
Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F.M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614.
Buss, D.M. (1996). Social adaptation and five major factors of personality . In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 180-207). New York: Guilford.
9.
Chen-Idson, L., & Mischel, W. (2001). The personality of familiar and significant people: The lay perceiver as a social-cognitive theorist. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 585-596.
10.
Chung, C.K., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2008). Revealing dimensions of thinking in open-ended self-descriptions: An automated meaning extraction method for natural language. Journal of Research in Personality , 42, 96-132.
11.
Costa, P.T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12.
Cottrell, C.A., Neuberg, S.L., & Li, N.P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 208-231.
13.
Cuddy, A.J.C., Fiske, S.T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS Map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 92, 631-648.
14.
De Bruin, E.N.M., & van Lange, P.A.M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206-219.
15.
Denrell, J. (2005). Why most people disapprove of me: Experience sampling in impression formation. Psychological Review, 112, 951-978.
16.
Donahue, E.M. (1994). Do children use the Big Five, too? Content and structural form in personality description. Journal of Personality , 62, 45-66.
17.
Dornbusch, S.M., Hastorf, A.H., Richardson, S.A., Muzzy, R.E., & Vreeland, R.S. (1965). The perceiver and the perceived: Their relative influence on categories of interpersonal cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 434-440.
18.
Fiske, S.T., & Cox, M.G. (1979). Person concepts: The effect of target familiarity and descriptive purpose on the process of describing others. Journal of Personality, 47, 136-161.
19.
Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., & Glick, P. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83.
20.
Funder, D.C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
21.
Funder, D.C., & Dobroth, K.M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with inter-judge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
22.
Galinsky, A.D., Magee, J.C., Inesi, M.E., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
23.
Gill, M.J., & Swann, W.B. (2004). On what it means to know someone: A matter of pragmatics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 405-418.
24.
Gill, M.J., Swann, W.B., & Silvera, D.H. (1998). On the genesis of confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1101-1114.
25.
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
26.
Gosling, S.D., Gaddis, S., & Vazire, S. (2007). Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles . Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Boulder, CO.
27.
Gosling, S.D., Ko, S.J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M.E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 379-398.
28.
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
29.
Graziano, W.G., & Eisenberg, N.H. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795-824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
30.
John, O.P., & Robins, R.W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
31.
John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
32.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
33.
Kenny, D.A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis . New York: Guilford.
34.
Kenny, D.A., & Kenny, D.T. (2006). The personalities of The Simpsons. In A. Brown (Ed.), D'oh! The psychology of The Simpsons (pp. 187-200). Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
35.
Levesque, M.J., & Kenny, D.A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178-1187.
36.
Locke, K., & Sadler, P. (2007). Self-efficacy, values, and complementarity in dyadic interactions: Integrating interpersonal and social-cognitive theory . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 94-109.
37.
Moskowitz, D.S., Ho, M.-H. R., & Turcotte-Tremblay, A.-M. (2007). Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1051-1063.
38.
Norman, W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
39.
Park, B. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 51, 907-917.
40.
Park, B., DeKay, M.L., & Kraus, S. (1994). Aggregating social behavior into person models: Perceiver-induced consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 437-459.
41.
Paulhus, D.L., & Bruce, M.N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
42.
Prentice, D.A. (1990). Familiarity and differences in self-and other-representations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 369-383.
43.
Sneed, C.D., McCrae, R.R., & Funder, D.C. (1998). Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 115-126.
44.
Snodgrass, S.E. (1985). Women's intuition: The effect of subordinate role on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 146-155.
45.
Stevens, L.E., & Fiske, S.T. (2000). Motivated impressions of a power-holder: Accuracy under task dependency and misperception under evaluation dependency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 907-922.
46.
Trapnell, P.D., & Wiggins, J.S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790.
47.
Uleman, J.S., Newman, L.S., & Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 211-279.
48.
Wiggins, J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
49.
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
50.
Wojciszke, B., Bazińska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245-1257.
51.
Zebrowitz, L.A., & Collins, M.A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 1, 204-223.
