Overcoming Beneficiary Race as an Impediment to Charitable Donations: Social Dominance Orientation,the Experience of Moral Elevation,and Donation Behavior
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2009
Overcoming Beneficiary Race as an Impediment to Charitable Donations: Social Dominance Orientation,the Experience of Moral Elevation,and Donation Behavior
Three studies examined the relationship between social dominance orientation (SDO), the experience of moral elevation, and Whites' donations to charitable organizations. Study 1 used video clips depicting acts of moral excellence to elicit a state of moral elevation (a distinctive feeling of warmth and expansion, which is accompanied by admiration, affection, and even love for people whose exemplary moral behavior is being observed). Results show that moral elevation increased participants' willingness to donate to a Black-oriented charity and attenuated the negative effect of the group-based dominance (GBD) component of SDO on donation behavior. Studies 2 and 3 replicate and extend these findings by using a written story to elicit a state of moral elevation and examining actual donations to a Black-oriented charity. Results show that moral elevation increased donations to the Black-oriented charity and neutralized the negative influence of GBD.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Algoe, S., & Haidt, J. (2006). Witnessing excellence in action: The "other-praising" emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. Manuscript under review.
3.
Amiot, C.E., & Bourhis, R.Y. (2005). Discrimination and the positive-negative asymmetry effect between dominant and subordinate groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 289-308.
4.
Basil, D.Z., Ridgway, N.M., & Basil, M.D. (2008). Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 1-23.
5.
Bonin, R., & De Luca Sheh, D. (Producers). (2000, February 29). 60 minutes II [Television broadcast]. New York: CBS Broadcasting.
6.
Dvorkin, J.A. (2006, March 7). Is compassion fatigue setting in? Retrieved April 21, 2006, from the National Public Radio Web site: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5249873
7.
Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665-697.
8.
Federico, C.M. (1999). The interactive effects of social dominance orientation, group status, and perceived stability on favoritism for high-status groups . Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 119-144.
9.
Federico, C.M., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Racism, ideology, and affirmative action revisited: The antecedents and consequences of "principled objections" to affirmative action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 488-502.
10.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
11.
Forgas, J.P., & Moylan, S. (1991). Affective influences on stereotype judgments. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 379-397.
12.
Fredrickson, B.L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
13.
George, J.M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299-307.
14.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
16.
Haddock, G., Zanna, M.P., & Esses, V.M. (1994). Mood and the expression of intergroup attitudes: The moderating role of affect intensity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 189-206.
17.
Haidt, J. (2000). The positive emotion of elevation. Prevention and Treatment, 3(3), Article C. Retrieved May 2, 2007, from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=main.showContent&id=2000-03082-003&view=fulltext
18.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review , 108, 814-834.
19.
Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Johnson, K.J., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2005). We all look the same to me: Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 875-881.
21.
Jost, J.T., & Thompson, E.P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans andEuropean Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
22.
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297-314.
23.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology , 19, 373-404.
24.
Mosely, D. (Producer). (1998, July 29). Public eye [Television broadcast] . New York: CBS Broadcasting.
25.
National Urban League. (2007). State of Black America 2007 executive summary. Retrieved June 5, 2007, from http://www.nul.org/publications/SOBA/Executive%20Summary/2007SOBAEXCSUMMARY.pdf
26.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
27.
Royzman, E.B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. Social Justice Research, 15, 165-184.
28.
Shweder, R.A. (1994). "You're not sick, you're just in love": Emotion as an interpretive system. In P. Ekman & R. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotions: Fundamental questions (pp. 32-44). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
31.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell. M. (1994). Ingroup identification, social dominance orientation, and differential group social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
32.
Silvers, J.A., & Haidt, J. (2008). Moral elevation can induce nursing. Emotion, 8, 291-295.
33.
Spencer, S.J., Zanna, M.P., & Fong, G.T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective in examining psychological process than mediational analyses . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
34.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007). Annual social and economic (ASEC) supplement. Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/altinc/newinc03_000.htm
35.
Waugh, C.E., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of new relationships. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.
36.
World Vision. (2006). Care for orphans and widows. Retrieved May 22, 2006, from http://donate.wvus.org/OA_HTML/xxwvibeCCtpItmDspRte.jsp?section=10048&item=100
