A high need for uniqueness undermines majority influence. Need for uniqueness (a) is a psychological state in which individuals feel indistinguishable from others and (b) motivates compensatory acts to reestablish a sense of uniqueness. Three studies demonstrate that a strive for uniqueness motivates individuals to resist majority influence. In Study 1, the need for uniqueness was measured, and it was found that individuals high in need for uniqueness yielded less to majority influence than those low in need for uniqueness. In Study 2, participants who received personality feedback undermining their feeling of uniqueness agreed less with a majority (vs. minority) position. Study 3 replicated this effect and additionally demonstrated the motivational nature of the assumed mechanism: An alternative means that allowed participants to regain a feeling of uniqueness canceled out the effect of high need for uniqueness on majority influence.
Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs , 70, 1-70.
2.
Axsom, D., Yates, S., & Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 30-40.
3.
Baker, S.M., & Petty, R.E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4.
Bond, R., & Smith, P.B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
5.
Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 17, 475-482.
6.
Brewer, M.B., & Pickett, C.L. (1999). Distinctiveness motive as a source of the social self. In T. R. Tyler, R. M. Kramer, & O. P. John (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 71-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Brewer, M.B., & Roccas, S. (2001). Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness. In C. Sedikides & M. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 219-237). New York: Psychology.
8.
Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
9.
Cialdini, R.B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice. New York: HarperCollins.
10.
Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 151-192). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/ Correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Crano, W.D. (2001). Social influence, social identity, and ingroup leniency. In N. K. De Vries & C. K. W. De Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 122-143). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
Darke, P., Chaiken, S., Bohner, G., Einwiller, S., Erb, H.-P., & Hazlewood, D. (1998). Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1205-1215.
14.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
15.
David, B., & Turner, J.C. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single process self-categorization analysis. In N. K. De Vries & C. K. W. De Dreu (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 91-121). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Minority dissent, attitude change, and group performance . In A. R. Pratkanis (Ed.), The science of social influence (pp. 247-270). New York: Psychology.
17.
De Dreu, C.K.W., De Vries, N.K., Franssen, H., & Altink, W. (1999). Minority dissent in organizations: Factors influencing willingness to dissent. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 30, 2451-2466.
18.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
19.
Erb, H.-P. (1998). Sozialer Einfluss durch Konsens: Werbung mit Meinungsübereinstimmung [Social influence through consensus: Advertising with shared attitudes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 156-164.
20.
Erb, H.-P., & Bohner, G. (2007). Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology: Social communication (pp. 191-221). Hove, UK: Psychology .
21.
Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Werth, L., Hewstone, M., & Reinhard, M.-A. (2006). Large minorities and small majorities: Interactive effects of inferred and explicit consensus on attitudes . Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 221-231.
22.
Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Rank, S., & Einwiller, S. (2002). Processing minority and majority communications: The role of conflict with prior attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1172-1182.
23.
Erb, H.-P., Bohner, G., Schmälzle, K., & Rank, S. (1998). Beyond conflict and discrepancy: Cognitive bias in minority and majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 620-633.
24.
Fromkin, H.L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521-529.
25.
Fromkin, H.L. (1972). Feelings of interpersonal undistinctiveness: An unpleasant affective state. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 178-185.
26.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
27.
Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect . Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
28.
Hornsey, M.J., & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 248-264.
29.
Kim, H., & Markus, H.R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 785-800.
30.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493-529). New York: Guilford.
31.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Mackie, D.M. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 229-261.
32.
Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities . Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
33.
Le Pine, J., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
34.
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 27, 1861-1883.
35.
Lynn, M., & Snyder, C.R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395-419). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Maass, A., & Clark, R.D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
37.
Mackie, D.M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
38.
Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings: The effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
39.
Maslach, C. (1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411-425.
40.
Maslach, C., Stapp, J., & Santee, R.T. (1985). Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 729-738.
41.
McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 233-346). New York: Newbery Award Records.
42.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
43.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behaviour. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32, 365-379.
45.
Moscovici, S., & Perez, J.A. (2007). A study of minorities as victims. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 725-746.
46.
Mugny, G. (1975). Negotiations, image of the other, and the process of minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology , 5, 209-228.
47.
Mugny, G. (1982). The power of minorities. London : Academic Press.
48.
Nail, P.R. (1986). Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 190-206.
49.
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990). From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review, 97, 362-376.
50.
Pickett, C.L., Silver, M.D., & Brewer, M.B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of ingroup size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 546-558.
51.
Sigall, H., Mucchi-Faina, A., & Mosso, C. (2006). Minority influence is facilitated when the communication employs linguistic abstract-ness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 443-451.
52.
Simonson, I., & Nowlis, S.M. (2000). The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 49-68.
53.
Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518-527.
54.
Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1980). Uniqueness, the human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
55.
Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O., & Hunter, G.L. (2001). Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 50-66.
56.
Turner, J.C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
57.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
58.
Vignoles, V.L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G.M. (2000). The distinctiveness principle: Identity, meaning, and the bounds of cultural relativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 337-354.
59.
Watts, W.A., & Holt, L.E. (1979). Persistence of opinion change under conditions of forewarning and distraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 778-789.
60.
White, G.L., & Zimbardo, P.G. (1980). The effects of threat of surveillance and actual surveillance on expressed opinions toward marijuana . Journal of Social Psychology, 111, 49-61.
61.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin , 115, 323-345.
62.
Ziller, R.C. (1964). Individuation and socialization: A theory of assimilation in large organizations. Human Relations, 17, 341-360.
63.
Zimbardo, P.G. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
