Much recent research suggests that North Americans more frequently experience approach motivations and East Asians more frequently experience avoidance motivations. The current research explores some cognitive implications of this cultural difference. North Americans should be more attentive to approach-oriented information, whereas East Asians should be more attentive to avoidance-oriented information. Three studies confirmed this hypothesis. When asked to recall information framed in either approach or avoidance terms, a predicted interaction between culture and information frame was observed (Study 1 and 2). Moreover, analyses of consumer book reviews found that among reviews that were rated as helpful, approach-focused content was more prevalent in American reviews compared to Japanese reviews, in which avoidance-focused content was more prevalent (Study 3). Findings from the current research add to the growing literature of cross-cultural research on approach—avoidance motivations.
Aaker, J.L., & Lee, A.Y. (2001). "I" seek pleasures and "We" avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 33-49.
2.
Cacioppo, J.T., Gardner, W.L., & Berntson, G.G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
3.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M.A. (1994). Temperament and attention: Orienting toward and away from positive and negative signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1128-1139.
4.
Elliot, A.J., (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 149-169.
5.
Elliot, A.J., Chirkov, V.I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K.M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505-510.
6.
Elliot, A.J., & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
7.
Endo, Y., & Meijer, Z. (2004). Autobiographical memory of success and failure experiences. In Y. Kashima, Y. Endo, E. S. Kashima , C. Leung, & J. McClure (Eds.), Progress in Asian Social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 67-84). Seoul , Korea: Kyoyook-Kwahak-Sa Publishing.
8.
Hamamura, T., & Heine, S.J. (2008a). Enhanced motivation under regulatory fit: A cross-cultural analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
Hamamura, T., & Heine, S.J. (2008b). Approach and avoidance motivation across cultures . In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 557-570). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
Heine, S.J. (2005). Constructing good selves in Japan and North America . In R. M. Sorrentino, D. Cohen, J. M. Olson , & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Culture and social behavior: The tenth Ontario Symposium (pp. 115-143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Heine, S.J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D.R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 599-615.
12.
Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
13.
Higgins, E.T., Roney, C., Crowe, E., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: Distinct self-regulatory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
14.
Higgins, E.T., & Spiegel, S. (2004). Promotion and prevention strategies for self-regulation: A motivated cognition perspective. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications (pp. 171-187). New York: Guilford.
15.
Higgins, E.T., & Tykocinski, O. (1992). Self-discrepancies and biographical memory: Personality and cognition at the level of the psychological situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 527-535.
16.
Ho, D.Y. (1976). On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 867-884.
17.
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). Cultural affordances and emotional experience: Socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903.
18.
Kwan, V.S.Y., Bond, M.H., & Singelis, T.M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038-1051.
19.
Landis, R.J., & & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
20.
Lee, A.Y., Aaker, J.L., & Gardner, W.L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1122-1134.
21.
Lockwood, P., Marshall, T.C., & Sadler, P. (2005). Promoting success or preventing failure: Cultural differences in motivation by positive and negative role models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 379-392.
22.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
23.
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310
24.
Norenzayan, A., & Heine, S.J. (2005). Psychological universals: What are they and how can we know? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 763-784.
25.
Oishi, S. (2002). The experiencing and remembering of well-being: A cross-cultural analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1398-1406.
26.
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1674-1682.
27.
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2003). Culture and well-being: The cycle of action, evaluation, and decision. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 939-949.
28.
Ouschan, L., Boldero, J., Kashima, Y., Wakimoto, R., & Kashima, E. (2007). Regulatory Focus Strategies Scale: A measure of individual differences in the endorsement of regulatory strategies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 243-257.
29.
Strachman, S., & Gable, S.L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1446-1459.
30.
Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
