Communicating Stereotype-Relevant Information: Is Factual Information Subject to the Same Communication Biases as Fictional Information?

Abstract

Factual information is more frequently read and discussed than fictional information. However, research on the role of communication in shaping stereotypes has focused almost exclusively on fictional narratives. In Experiments 1 and 2 a newspaper article containing information about heroin users was communicated along chains of 4 people. No stereotype-consistency bias was observed. Instead, a greater proportion of stereotype-inconsistent information was communicated than was stereotype-consistent or -neutral information. Three further experiments investigated explanations for the difference between the communication of fictional and factual information. Experiment 3 ruled out the possibility that participants' beliefs about the validity of the information could influence the way that it is communicated. Experiments 4 and 5 divided information into concrete (a specific event or fact) or abstract (opinion). A stereotype-consistency bias emerged only for abstract information. In summary, linguistic abstraction moderates whether stereotype-consistency biases emerge in the communication of stereotype-relevant factual information.

Keywords

stereotypes communication newspaper articles linguistic expectancy bias linguistic abstraction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Age Positive. (2008). Valuing age in the workplace. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from http://www.agepositive.gov.uk

Allport, F.H. (1954). The structuring of events: Outline of a general theory with applications to psychology. Psychological Review , 61, 281-303.

Andalo, D. (2005, February 3). Anger over "harmless heroin" study . The Guardian. Retrieved February 16, 2005 , from http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/feb/03/societybriefing

Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Book Marketing Ltd. (2002). The reading habits of individuals and couples. London: Author.

Clark, H.H. (1996). Communities, commonalities, and communication . In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 324-355). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Edwards, J. , & Moyes, S. (2005, November 4). Trouble `n strife for Eastenders hardmen . The Mirror. Retrieved November 16, 2005, from http://www.mirror.co.uk/celebs-old/latest/2005/11/04/trouble-n-strife-for-eastenders-hardmen-115875-16330925

The Employers Forum on Age. (2008). The end of the line for retirement ages: The business case for managing without a retirement age. Retrieved September 18, 2008, from www.efa.org.uk

Heiser, J. , & Tversky, B. (2006). Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science, 30, 581-592.

10.

Kashima, Y. (2000). Maintaining cultural stereotypes in the serial reproduction of narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 594-604.

11.

Lyons, A. , & Kashima, Y. (2001). The reproduction of culture: Communication processes tend to maintain cultural stereotypes. Social Cognition, 19, 372-394.

12.

Macrae, C.N. , Milne, A.B. , & Bodenhausen, G.V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37-47.

13.

McIntyre, A. , Lyons, A. , Clark, A. , & Kashima, Y. (2004). The micro-genesis of culture: Serial reproduction as an experimental simulation of cultural dynamics. In M. Schaller & C. S. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 227-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

14.

Owen, B.M. (1999). The Internet challenge to television. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Poulin-Dubois, D. , Serbin, L.A. , Eichstedt, J.A. , & Sen, M.G. (2002). Men don't put on make-up: Toddlers' knowledge of the gender stereotyping of household activities. Social Development, 11, 166-181.

16.

Riffe, D. , Lacy, S. , & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.

18.

Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model: Its bases, applications and range. European Review o f Social Psychology, 2, 1-30.

19.

Semin, G.R. , & Fiedler, K. (1992). The inferential properties of interpersonal verbs . In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 58-78). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

20.

Shewan, D. , & Dalgarno, P. (2005). Low levels of negative health and social outcomes among non-treatment heroin users in Glasgow (Scotland): Evidence for controlled heroin use? British Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 33-48.

21.

Suoninen. (2001). The role of media in peer group relations. In S. M. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative (pp. 201-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

22.

Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.

23.

Wigboldus, D.H.J. , Semin, G.R. , & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic bases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.