Leaders frequently form stronger relationships with certain subordinates moreso than others, creating an inner circle of close friendships and an outer circle of more distant relationships. Three studies examine the effects of inner-circle membership on group dynamics and interpersonal influence in hierarchical teams. Study 1 finds that, compared to outer-circle members, inner-circle members feel safer and participate in the group discussion more, and leaders recognize them as making a greater contribution and allocate a larger bonus to them. Consequently, inner-circle members influence the groups' decisions more, and team decision quality improves when inner-circle members possess expert knowledge. Study 2 finds that leaders attended to and recalled suggestions from their inner circle more regardless of argument strength, suggesting heuristic information processing. Study 3 replicates these findings using intact teams in a large governmental agency. Implications for leadership and group decision making are discussed.
Ames, D.R., & Flynn, F.J. (2007). What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 307-324.
2.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Boyd, N.G., & Taylor, R.R. (1998). A developmental approach to the examination of friendship in leader-follower relationships. Leadership Quarterly , 9, 1-25.
4.
Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., & Tsai, W.P. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 795-817.
5.
Bunderson, J.S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 557-591.
6.
Davidovitz, R., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R., Izsak R., & Popper, M. (2007). Leaders as attachment figures: Leaders' attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 632-650.
7.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.
8.
Detert, J.R., & Burris, E.R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869-884.
9.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
10.
Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., & Swann, W.B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
11.
Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly , 6, 219-247.
12.
Gruenfeld, D., Mannix, E.A., Williams, K.Y., & Neale, M.A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1-15.
13.
Haslam, S.A., & Platow, M. (2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
14.
Heneman, R.L., Greenberger, D.B., & Anonyuo, C. (1989). Attributions and exchanges: The effects of interpersonal factors on the diagnosis of employee performance. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 466-476.
15.
Hinsz, V.B., Tindale, R.S., & Vollrath, D.A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processes. Psychological Bulletin , 121, 43-64.
16.
Homan, A., van Knippenberg, D., Van Kleef, G., & De Dreu, C. (2007). Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information evaluation, and performance in diverse work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1189-1199.
17.
Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
18.
Human Synergistics. (2003). Envisioning a culture for quality . Plymouth, MI: Author.
19.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422-447.
20.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
21.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations . Academy of Management Journal, 37, 87-108.
23.
Kingstrom, P.O., & Mainstone, L.E. (1985). An investigation of the rater-ratee acquaintance and rater bias. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 641-653.
24.
Larson, J.R.J., Christensen, C., Abbott, A.S., & Franz, T.M. (1996). Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision making teams. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 315-330.
25.
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
26.
Littlepage, G.E., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. (1997). Effect of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 69, 133-147.
27.
Littlepage, G.E., Schmidt, G.W., Whisler, E.W., & Frost, A.G. (1995). An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877-889.
28.
Mackie, D.M., Worth, L.T., & Asuncion, A.G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 58, 812-822.
29.
Mehra, A., Dixon, A.L., Brass, D.J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17, 64-79.
30.
Nathan, B.R., Mohrman, A.M., & Milliman, J. (1991). Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: A longitudinal study . Academy of Management Journal, 34, 352-369.
31.
Peterson, R.S. (1999). Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 313-324.
32.
Phillips, K. (2003). The effects of categorically based expectations on minority influence: The importance of congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 3-13.
33.
Phillips, K.W., Mannix, E.A., Neale, M.A., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2004). Diverse groups and information sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 497-510.
34.
Robbins, T.L., & DeNisi, A.S. (1994). A closer look at interpersonal affect as a distinct influence on cognitive processing in performance evaluations . Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 341-353.
35.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, R.J. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self perception and social perception processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 13, 279-301.
36.
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
37.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
38.
Seidel, M.L., Polzer, J.T., & Stewart, K.J. (2000). Friends in high places: The effects of social networks on discrimination in salary negotiations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 1-24.
39.
Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 323-355.
40.
Thomas-Hunt, M., & Phillips, K. (2004). When what you know is not enough: Expertise and gender dynamics in task groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1585-1598.
41.
Tsui, A.S., & Barry, B. (1986). Interpersonal affect and rating errors. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 586-599.
42.
van Knippenberg, D. (1999). Social identify and persuasion: Reconsidering the role of group membership. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 315-331). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
43.
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M.A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. In R. M. Kramer & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, pp. 243-298). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
44.
Vroom, V.H., & Yetton, P.W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
45.
Wayne, S.J., & Ferris, G.R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487-499.
