This article examines cognitive links between romantic love and creativity and between sexual desire and analytic thought based on construal level theory. It suggests that when in love, people typically focus on a long-term perspective, which should enhance holistic thinking and thereby creative thought, whereas when experiencing sexual encounters, they focus on the present and on concrete details enhancing analytic thinking. Because people automatically activate these processing styles when in love or when they experience sex, subtle or even unconscious reminders of love versus sex should suffice to change processing modes. Two studies explicitly or subtly reminded participants of situations of love or sex and found support for this hypothesis.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO : Westview.
2.
Andersen, S.M., & Chen, S. ( 2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109, 619-645.
3.
Andersen, B.L. & Cyranowski, J.M. ( 1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079-1100.
4.
Aries, P., & Dupies, G. ( 2000). Histoire de la vie privée [History of private life]. Paris: Editions du Seuil .
5.
Aron, A., Aron, E.N., & Smollan, D. ( 1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612.
6.
Aron, A., & Westbay, L. ( 1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535-551.
7.
Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. ( 2000). The neural basis of romantic love. NeuroReport , 11, 3829-3834.
8.
Beck, J.G., Bozman, A.W., & Qualtrough, T. (1991). The experience of sexual desire: Psychological correlates in a college sample. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 443-456.
9.
Berscheid, E., & Hatfield, E. ( 1969). Interpersonal attraction. New York : Addison-Wesley.
10.
Buss, D.M. ( 1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies . In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3-38). New York: Guilford.
11.
Buss, D.M. ( 2004). Evolutionary psychology. The new science of the mind . Boston: Pearson.
12.
Buss, D.M., & Barnes, M. ( 1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
13.
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. ( 1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464-478.
14.
Darwin, C. ( 2004). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex . Whitefish, MT: Kessinger. (Original work published 1871)
15.
Derryberry, D., & Reed, M.A. ( 1998). Anxiety and attentional focusing: Trait, state and hemispheric influences. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 745-761.
16.
Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D.M. ( 1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), Heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167-196). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Diamond, L.M. ( 2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110, 173-192.
18.
Diamond, L.M. ( 2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116-119.
19.
Dion, K.L., & Dion, K.K. ( 1988). Romantic love: Individual and cultural perspectives. In R. Sternberg & M. Barnes (Eds.), The psychology of love (pp. 264-289). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Epstude, K., & Roese, N.J. ( 2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168-192.
21.
Fehr, B. ( 1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.
22.
Finke, R.A. ( 1995). Creative realism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 303-326). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Förster, J., Friedman, R.S., & Liberman, N. ( 2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
24.
Förster, J., Friedman, R., Özelsel, A., & Denzler, M. ( 2006). Enactment of approach and avoidance behavior influences the scope of perceptual and conceptual attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 133-146.
25.
Förster, J., & Liberman, N. ( 2007). Knowledge activation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 201-231). New York: Guilford .
26.
Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E.T. ( 2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220-239.
27.
Förster, J., Özelsel, A., & Epstude, K. ( 2009). How love and lust change people's perception of partners and relationships. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
Freud, S. ( 2000). Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie [Three essays on the theory of sexuality]. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer. (Original work published 1905)
29.
Friedman, R., Fishbach, A., Förster, J., & Werth, L. ( 2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 277-286.
30.
Friedman, R.S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492.
31.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
32.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41-55.
33.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 263-275.
34.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2008). Activation and measurement of motivational states. In A. Elliott (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 235-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Gagné, F.M., & Lydon, J.E. ( 2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322-338.
36.
Gasper, K. ( 2004). Do you see what I see? Affect and visual information processing. Cognition & Emotion, 18, 405-421.
37.
Gasper, K., & Clore, G.L. ( 2002). Attending to the big picture: Mood and global versus local processing of visual information. Psychological Science , 13, 33-39.
38.
Gonzaga, G.C., Turner, R.A., Keltner, D., Campos, B.C., & Altemus, M. ( 2006). Romantic love and sexual desire in close bonds. Emotion, 6, 163-179.
39.
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R.B., & Kenrick, D.T. ( 2006). Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 52-66.
40.
Hampson, S.E., John, O.P., & Goldberg, L.R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37-54.
41.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. ( 2005). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
42.
Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R.L. (in press). Love and intimacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
43.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. ( 1987). Romantic love as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
44.
Higgins, E.T. ( 1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist , 52, 1280-1300.
45.
John, O.P., Hampson, S.E., & Goldberg, L.R. (1991). The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: Studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 348-361.
46.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Bolger, N. ( 1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Kühnen, U., & Oyserman, D. ( 2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: Cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499.
48.
Li, N.P., Bailey, J.M., Kenrick, D.T., & Linsenmeier, J.A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947-955.
49.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18.
50.
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. ( 2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
51.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, W. ( 2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 353-384). New York: Guilford .
52.
Luu, P., Tucker, D.M., & Derryberry, D. (1998). Anxiety and the motivational basis of working memory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22, 577-594.
53.
Markman, K.D., Lindberg, M.J., Kray, L.J., & Galinsky, A.D. (2007). Implications of counterfactual structure for creative generation and analytical problem-solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 312-324.
54.
Marsh, R.L., Ward, T.B., & Landau, J.D. ( 1999). The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 94-105.
55.
Mikulincer, M. ( 1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209-1224.
56.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P.R. ( 2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change . New York: Guilford.
57.
Møller, A.P., & Petrie, M. ( 2002). Condition dependence, multiple sexual signals, and immunocompetence in peacocks. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 248-253.
58.
Murray, S.L. ( 1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23-34.
59.
Murray, S.L., & Holmes, J.G. ( 1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 586-604.
60.
Mussweiler, T., & Förster, J. (2000). The sex aggression link: A perception-behavior dissociation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 507-520.
61.
Navon, D. ( 1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
62.
Neff, L.A., & Karney, B.R. ( 2002). Judgments of a relationship partner: Specific accuracy but global enhancement. Journal of Personality, 70, 1079-1112.
63.
Neff, L.A., & Karney, B.R. ( 2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480-497.
64.
Noller, P. ( 1996). What is this thing called love? Defining the love that supports marriage and family. Personal Relationships, 3, 97-115.
65.
Regan, P.C., & Berscheid, E. ( 1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female desire. Personal Relationships, 2, 345-358.
66.
Regan, P.C., Kocan, E.R., & Whitlock, T. ( 1998). Ain't love grand! A prototype analysis of the concept of romantic love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 15, 411-420.
67.
Roese, N.J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G.L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 1109-1120.
68.
Roese, N.J., Pennington, G., Coleman, J., Janicki, M., Li, N., & Kenrick, D.T. ( 2006). Sex differences in regret: All for love or some for lust ? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 770-780.
69.
Rubin, Z. ( 1970). Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 265-273.
70.
Schooler, J.W. ( 2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
71.
Schooler, J.W., Fiore, S.M., & Brandimonte, M.A. (1997). At a loss from words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 37. Advances in research and theory (pp. 291-340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72.
Schooler, J.W., & Melcher, J. ( 1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97-133). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73.
Schooler, J.W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. ( 1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight . Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166-183.
74.
Shah, J.Y. ( 2003). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424-439.
75.
Smith, E.R. ( 1989). Procedural efficiency: General and specific components and effects on social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 500-523.
76.
Sternberg, R.J. ( 1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119-135.
Tucker, D.M., & Williamson, P.A. (1984). Asymmetric neural control systems in human self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185-215.
79.
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D.L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
80.
Ward, T.B. ( 1995). What’s new about old ideas. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 157-178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. ( 1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. New York: Oxford University Press.
