Social vigilantism (SV) is an enduring individual difference that assesses the tendency of individuals to impress and propagate their “superior” beliefs onto others to correct others’ more “ignorant” opinions. After establishing a reliable measure of SV, three studies showed that SV was associated with greater expressions of belief superiority (whether reacting to others holding dissimilar or similar beliefs) and greater resistance to persuasion (via increased rates of counterarguing and greater attitude stability after persuasion appeals) even after controlling for relevant individual differences (narcissism, dogmatism, psychological reactance, and need for cognition), as well as attitude importance and extremity. Thus, SV predicts expressions of belief superiority and resistance to persuasion above and beyond characteristics of the attitude and individual difference variables previously studied in the attitude literature. SV is a meaningful construct in increasing the understanding of persuasion, attitude resistance, and attitude dissemination that can be applied in a variety of psychological domains.
Abelson, R.P. ( 1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5, 343-352.
2.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
4.
Bargh, J.A., Gollwitzer, P.M., Lee-Chai, A.Y., Barndollar, K., & Troetschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1014-1027.
5.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6.
Brehm, J.W. ( 1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Brehm, S.S., & Brehm, J.W. ( 1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control . New York: Academic Press.
8.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. ( 1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-134.
9.
Cameron, K.A., Jacks, J.Z., & O’Brien, M.E. (2002). An experimental examination of strategies for resisting persuasion. Current Research in Social Psychology, 7, 205-224.
10.
Campbell, W.K. ( 1999). Narcissism and romantic attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1254-1270.
11.
Dowd, E.T., Milne, C.R., & Wise, S.L. ( 1991). The therapeutic reactance scale: A measure of psychological reactance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 541-545.
12.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. ( 1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York : Harcourt Brace.
13.
Emmons, R.A. ( 1989). Exploring the relations between motives and traits: The case of narcissism. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 32-44). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Festinger, L., & Maccoby, N. ( 1964). On resistance to persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366.
15.
Jacks, J.Z., & Cameron, K.A. ( 2003). Strategies for resisting persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 145-161.
16.
Jacks, J.Z., & Devine, P.G. ( 2000). Attitude importance, forewarning of message content, and resistance to persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 22, 19-29.
17.
Kemp, C.G. ( 1960). Changes in values in relation to open-closed systems . In M. Rokeach (Ed.), The open and closed mind (pp. 335-346). New York: Basic Books.
18.
Kernis, M.H., & Sun, C.R. ( 1994). Narcissism and reactions to interpersonal feedback. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 4-13.
19.
Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chuang, Y.C., Berent, M.K., & Carnot, C.G. ( 1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.
20.
Krosnick, J.A., & Petty, R.E. ( 1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Larsen, R.J., & Buss, D.M. ( 2002). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Morf, C.C., & Rhodewalt, F. ( 1993). Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance: Explorations in object relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 19, 668-676.
23.
Morf, C.C., & Rhodewalt, F. ( 2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177-196.
24.
Nail, P.R., Van Leeuwen, M.D., & Powell, A.B. ( 1996). The effectance versus the self-presentational view of reactance: Are importance ratings influenced by anticipated surveillance? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 573-584.
25.
Nimmer, J.G., & Handelsman, M.M. (1992). Effects of subject pool policy on student attitudes toward psychology and psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 141-144.
26.
Petty, R.E., & Krosnick, J.A. (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. ( 1988). A principal components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
28.
Rokeach, M. ( 1954). The nature and meaning of dogmatism. Psychological Review, 61, 194-204.
29.
Rokeach, M. ( 1960). The open and closed mind. New York : Basic Books.
30.
Rokeach, M., & Fruchter, B. ( 1956). A factorial study of dogmatism and related concepts. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 356-360.
31.
Shrauger, J.S., & Kelly, R.J. ( 1988). Global self-evaluation and changes in self-description as a function of information discrepancy and favorability. Journal of Personality, 56, 709-728.
32.
Smalley, R.L., & Stake, J.E. ( 1996). Evaluating sources of ego-threatening feedback: Self-esteem and narcissism effects. Journal of Research in Personality , 30, 483-495.
33.
Swann, W.B., Griffin, J.J., Predmore, S.C., & Gaines, B. ( 1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881-889.
34.
Troldahl, V.C., & Powell, F.A. ( 1965). A short-form dogmatism scale for use in field studies . Social Forces, 44, 211-214.
35.
Visser, P.S., Krosnick, J.A., & Simmons, J.P. ( 2003). Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 118-141.
36.
Wellins, R. ( 1977). Counterarguing and selective exposure to persuasion. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 115-127.
37.
Williams, L.E., Huang, J.Y., & Bargh, J.A. (in press). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology.
38.
Zuwerink, J.R., & Devine, P.G. ( 1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It’s not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.
