The normative conflict model predicts that expressions of dissent within groups can be motivated by the collective interest and that strongly identified members may dissent from group norms if and when they are perceived to be harmful to the collective. We present convergent evidence from four studies in support of the model. Study 1 investigated retrospective reports of disagreements and found that strongly identified members reported collectively oriented motives for expressing disagreement within their groups. Studies 2a and 2b provided experimental tests of the prediction that strongly identified group members are willing to dissent when they reflect on how a norm could harm their group but not when they reflect on negative individualistic consequences of the same norm. Finally, Study 3 replicated these effects using a correlational design that measured actual opinion expression in an ostensible online chat room.
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. ( 1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97-119.
2.
Asch, S.E. ( 1956). Studies of independence and conformity. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1-70.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
4.
Bond, R., & Smith, P.B. ( 1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
5.
Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschriter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: The effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35-56.
6.
Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
7.
Cohen, A.K. ( 1966). Deviance and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
De Dreu, C.K.W. ( 2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 285-298.
9.
Haslam, S.A., Ryan, M.K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. ( 2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607-628.
10.
Higgins, E.T. ( 1996). The "self digest": Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062-1083.
11.
Hirschman, A.O. ( 1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to a decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hornsey, M.J. ( 2005). Why being right is not enough: Predicting defensiveness in the face of group criticism. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 301-334.
14.
Hornsey, M.J. ( 2006). Ingroup critics and their influence on groups. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 74-91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Hornsey, M.J., Grice, T., Jetten, J., Paulsen, N., & Callan, V. ( 2007). Group-directed criticisms and recommendations for change: Why newcomers arouse more resistance than old-timers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1036-1048.
16.
Hornsey, M.J., & Jetten, J. ( 2005). Loyalty without conformity: Tailoring self-perception as a means of balancing belonging and differentiation. Self and Identity, 4, 81-95.
17.
Hornsey, M.J., Jetten, J., McAuliffe, B.J., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2006). The impact of individualist and collectivist group norms on evaluations of dissenting group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 57-68.
18.
Hornsey, M.J., Smith, J.R., & Begg, D. ( 2007). Effects of norms among those with moral conviction: Counter-conformity emerges on intentions but not behaviors. Social Influence , 2, 244-268.
19.
Janis, I.L. ( 1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascos. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B.J. (2002). "We’re all individuals": Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 189-207.
21.
Johnson, K.L., & White, K.M. ( 2003). Binge-drinking: A test of the role of group norms in the theory of planned behavior. Psychology and Health, 18, 63-77.
22.
Kelley, H., & Shapiro, M. ( 1954). An experiment on conformity to group norms when conformity is detrimental to group achievement. American Sociological Review, 19, 667-677.
23.
Louis, W.R., Taylor, D.M., & Douglas, R.L. ( 2005). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behaviour. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 355-374.
24.
Marques, J.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287-292.
25.
Matheson, K., Cole, B., & Majka, K. ( 2002). Dissidence from within: Examining the effects of intergroup context on group members’ reactions to attitudinal opposition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 161-169.
26.
Merton, R.K. ( 1968). Social theory and social structure (enlarged ed.). New York: Free Press.
27.
Morton, T.A., Postmes, T., & Jetten, J. ( 2007). Playing the game: When group success is more important than downgrading deviants. European Journal of Social Psychology , 37, 599-616.
28.
Moscovici, S. ( 1976). Social influence and social change. New York: Academic Press.
29.
Noelle-Neumann, E. ( 1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51.
30.
Packer, D.J. ( 2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50-73.
31.
Packer, D.J. ( 2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems . Psychological Science, 20, 546-548.
32.
Peterson, J.B. ( 1999). Maps of meaning: The architecture of belief. New York: Routledge.
33.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. ( 2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
34.
Prentice, D.A., & Miller, D.T. ( 1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.
35.
Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., & Norcross, J.C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist , 47, 1102-1114.
36.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. ( 2001). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Political Psychology , 22, 383-407.
37.
Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. ( 2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
38.
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. ( 1999). Identity, argument and schism: Two longitudinal studies of the split in the Church of England over the ordination of women to the priesthood. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 279-300.
39.
Sani, F., & Todman, J. ( 2002). Should we stay or should we go? A social psychological model of schisms in groups. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28, 1647-1655.
40.
Schachter, S. ( 1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
41.
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. ( 1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
42.
Spears, R., Lea, M., Corneliussen, R.A., Postmes, T., & Ter Haar, W. ( 2002). Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance. Small Group Research, 33, 555-574.
43.
Sunstein, C.R. ( 2006). Infotopia: How many minds produce knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
44.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
45.
Tata, J., Anthony, T., Lin, H., Newman, B., Tang, S., Millson, M., et al. (1996). Proportionate group size and rejection of the deviate: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 739-752.
46.
Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. ( 1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 22, 776-795.
47.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
48.
van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K.W., & Homan, A.C. ( 2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
49.
Wheeler, S.C., DeMarree, K.G., & Petty, R.E. ( 2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime-to-behavior effects: The active self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.
50.
White, K.M., Hogg, M.A., & Terry, D.J. ( 2002). Improving attitude-behavior correspondence through exposure to normative support from a salient ingroup. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 91-103.
51.
Wood, W., Quinn, J., & Kashy, D. ( 2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1281-1297.
52.
Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J.M. ( 2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contributions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 37, 502-509.
