Need for cognition (NFC) refers to an individual’s tendency to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive processing. So far, little attention has been paid to a systematic evaluation of the distinctiveness of NFC from traits with similar conceptualization and from intelligence. The present research contributes to filling this gap by examining the relation of NFC to well-established personality concepts (Study 1) and to a comprehensive measure of intelligence in a sample with broad educational backgrounds (Study 2). We observed NFC to be positively correlated with openness, emotional stability, and traits indicating goal orientation. Using confirmatory factor analysis and event-related potentials, incremental validity of NFC and openness to ideas was demonstrated, showing that NFC is more predictive of drive-related and goal-oriented behavior and attentional resource allocation. Regarding intelligence, NFC was more associated with fluid than with crystallized aspects of intelligence. Altogether, the results provide strong support for the conceptual autonomy of NFC.
Ackerman, P.L., & Heggestad, E.D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219-245.
2.
Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. ( 2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R)-Handanweisung [Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R)-Handbook]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
3.
Arthur, W., Jr., & Day, D.V. ( 1994). Development of a short form for the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 394-403.
4.
Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. ( 1999). Construct validity of sensation seeking: Validity results of a psychometric investigation. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20, 155-171.
5.
Berzonsky, M., D., & Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection . Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140-155.
6.
Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R.F., & Schwarz, N. ( 1994). Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: A scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie , 25, 147-154.
7.
Bors, D.A., Vigneau, F., & Lalande, F. ( 2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality, and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819-828.
8.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. ( 1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
9.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., & Jarvis, W.B. ( 1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
10.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. ( 1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
11.
Cattell, R.B. ( 1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
12.
Cloninger, C.R. ( 1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. A proposal. Archives of General Psychiatry , 44, 573-588.
13.
Cloninger, C.R., Adolfsson, R., & Svrakic, N.M. ( 1996). Mapping genes for human personality. Nature Genetics, 12, 3-4.
14.
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15.
Dai, D.Y., & Wang, X. ( 2006). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332-347.
16.
Day, E.A., Espejo, J., Kowollik, V., Boatman, P.R., & McEntire, L.E. (2007). Modeling the links between need for cognition and the acquisition of a complex skill. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 201-212.
17.
Egloff, B. ( 1998). The independence of positive and negative affect depends on the affect measure. Personality and Individual Differences , 25, 1101-1109.
18.
Egloff, B., Schmukle, S.C., Burns, L.R., Kohlmann, C.W., & Hock, M. ( 2003). Facets of dynamic positive affect: Differentiating joy, interest, and activation in the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 528-540.
19.
Eid, M. ( 2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions . Psychometrika, 65, 241-261.
20.
Enge, S., Fleischhauer, M., Brocke, B., & Strobel, A. ( 2008). Neurophysiological measures of involuntary and voluntary attention allocation and dispositional differences in need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 862-874.
21.
Forsterlee, R., & Ho, R. ( 1999). An examination of the short form of the Need for Cognition Scale applied in anAustralian sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 471-480.
22.
Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y.M., & Gaeta, H. ( 2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
23.
Gignac, G.E., Bates, T.C., & Jang, K.L. ( 2007). Implications relevant to CFA model misfit, reliability, and the five-factor model as measured by the NEO-FFI. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1051-1062.
24.
Gray, J.A. ( 1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Haddock, G., Maio, G.R., Arnold, K., & Huskinson, T. ( 2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 769-778.
26.
Haugtvedt, C.P., Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1992). Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior . Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1, 239-260.
27.
Holmes, D.J. ( 1990). The robustness of the usual correction for restriction in range due to explicit selection. Psychometrika, 55, 19-32.
28.
Horn, J.L. ( 1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
29.
Kardash, C.M., & Noel, L.K. ( 2000). How organizational signals, need for cognition, and verbal ability affect text recall and recognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 317-331.
30.
Krohne, H.W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. ( 1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the PANAS]. Diagnostica, 42, 139-156.
31.
Levin, I.P., Huneke, M.E., & Jasper, J.D. ( 2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion-exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 171-193.
32.
Maio, G.R., & Esses, V.M. ( 2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69, 583-615.
33.
Martin, L.L., Ward, D.W., Achee, J.W., & Wyer, R.S. ( 1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317-326.
34.
McCrae, R.R. ( 2000). Emotional intelligence from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 263-276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998-2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles : Author.
36.
Nair, U.K., & Ramnarayan, S. (2000). Individual differences in need for cognition and complex problem solving. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 305-328.
37.
Olson, K.R., Camp, C.J., & Fuller, D. ( 1984). Curiosity and need for cognition. Psychological Reports, 54, 71-74.
38.
Osberg, T.M. ( 1987). The convergent and discriminant validity of the Need for Cognition Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 51, 441-450.
39.
Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae. Revidierte Fassung (NEO-PI-R) [Revised NEO Personality Inventory, NEO-PI-R of Costa and McCrae]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
40.
Peltier, J.W., & Schibrowsky, J.A. (1994). Need for cognition, advertisement viewing time and memory for advertising stimuli. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 244-250.
41.
Perkins, D.N., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. ( 2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 269-293.
42.
Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin, M.J. (2009). The need for cognition . In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 318-329). New York: Guilford.
43.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 19, 123-205.
44.
Petty, R.E., & Jarvis, B.G. ( 1996). An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 221-257). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Polich, J. ( 2003). Overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of change: Event-related potential and fMRI findings (pp. 83-98). Boston: Kluwer.
46.
Revelle, W. ( 1993). Individual differences in personality and motivation: "Non-cognitive" determinants of cognitive performance. In A. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 346-373). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Sadowski, C. J., & Cogburn, H. E. (1997). Need for cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology, 131, 307-312. Schimmack, U. (2003). Affect measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79-106.
48.
Strobel, A., Beauducel, A., Debener, S., & Brocke, B. ( 2001). Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White [A German version of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 216-227.
49.
Tidwell, P.S., Sadowski, C.J., & Pate, L.M. ( 2000). Relationships between need for cognition, knowledge, and verbal ability. Journal of Personality, 134, 634-644.
50.
Tuten, T.L., & Bosnjak, M. ( 2001). Understanding differences in Web usage: The role of the need for cognition and the five-factor model of personality. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 29, 391-398.
51.
Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. ( 1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524-536.
52.
Venkatraman, M.P., & Price, L.L. ( 1990). Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness: Concepts, measurement, and implications. Journal of Business Research, 20, 293-315.
53.
Verplanken, B., Hazenberg, P.T., & Palenéwen, G.R. (1992). Need for cognition and external information search effort. Journal of Research in Personality, 26, 128-136.
54.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
55.
Webster, D.M., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
56.
Weyers, P., Krebs, H., & Janke, W. ( 1995). Reliability and construct validity of the German version of Cloninger’s Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 853-861.
57.
Woo, S.E., Harms, P.D., & Kuncel, N.R. ( 2007). Integrating personality and intelligence: Typical intellectual engagement and need for cognition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1635-1639.
58.
Zuckerman, M. ( 1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
59.
Zuckerman, M. ( 1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
