Political conservatism has been characterized by resistance to change and acceptance of inequality, with liberalism characterized by the polar opposite of these values. Political attitudes are heritable and may be influenced by basic personality traits. In previous research, conservatism (vs. liberalism) has been associated positively with Conscientiousness and negatively with Openness-Intellect, consistent with the association of conservatism with resistance to change. Less clear, however, are the personality traits relating to egalitarianism. In two studies, using a personality model that divides each of the Big Five into two aspects, the present research found that one aspect of Agreeableness (Compassion) was associated with liberalism and egalitarianism, whereas the other (Politeness) was associated with conservatism and traditionalism. In addition, conservatism and moral traditionalism were positively associated with the Orderliness aspect of Conscientiousness and negatively with Openness-Intellect. These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of personality’s relation to political attitudes and values.
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. ( 1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
2.
Ashton, M., Paunonen, S., Helmes, E., & Jackson, D. ( 1998). Kin altruism, reciprocal altruism, and the Big Five personality factors. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(4), 243-255.
3.
Bouchard, T., Segal, N., Tellegen, A., McGue, M., Keyes, M., & Krueger, R. ( 2003). Evidence for the construct validity and heritability of the Wilson-Patterson Conservatism Scale: A reared-apart twins study of social attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 959-969.
4.
Carney, D., Jost, J., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. ( 2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29(6), 807-840.
5.
Chuah, S.C., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B.W. ( 2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter?No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 359-376.
6.
Conover, P., & Feldman, S. ( 1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications . American Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 617-645.
DeYoung, C.G., Quilty, L.C., & Peterson, J.B. (2007). Between facets and domains: Ten aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880-896.
9.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., Du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. ( 2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 83(1), 75-93.
10.
Eysenck, H.J. ( 1954). The psychology of politics. London , UK: Routledge.
11.
Eysenck, H.J. ( 1975). The structure of social attitudes. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 323-331.
12.
Fiedler, E.R., Oltmanns, T.F., & Turkheimer, E. (2004). Traits associated with personality disorders and adjustment to military life: Predictive validity of self and peer reports. Military Medicine, 169(3), 207-211.
13.
Goldberg, L.R. ( 1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary , F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7-28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
14.
Goldberg, L.R. ( 2005). The Eugene-Springfield Community Sample: Information available from the research participants (Report No. 45). Eugene: Oregon Research Institute .
15.
Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., & Gough, H.G. ( 2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
16.
Goldberg, L.R., & Rosolack, T.K. (1994). The Big Five factor structure as an integrative framework: An empirical comparison with Eysenck’s PEN model. In C. F. Halverston, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 7-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B.A. ( 2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 96(5), 1029-1046.
18.
Graham, J., Nosek, B.A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P.H. ( 2009). Broadening and mapping the moral domain: The development and validation of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
Graziano, W., Bruce, J., Sheese, B., & Tobin, R. ( 2007). Attraction, personality, and prejudice: Liking none of the people most of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 565-582.
20.
Graziano, W., Habashi, M., Sheese, B., & Tobin, R. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. Graziano, W., & Tobin, R. (2002). Agreeableness: Dimension of personality or social desirability artifact? Journal of Personality, 70(5), 695-728.
21.
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. ( 2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98-116.
22.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. ( 2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules . In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Foundations and the future (Vol. 3, pp. 367-391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
Hofstee, W.K.B., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L.R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146-163.
24.
Jang, K.L., Livesley, W.J., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Vernon, P.A. ( 2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83-101.
25.
John, O.P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guilford.
26.
Jost, J.T. ( 2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651-670.
27.
Jost, J.T., Fitzsimons, G., & Kay, A.C. ( 2004). The ideological animal: A system justification view. In J. Greenberg, S. L. Koole, & T. Pyszczynski (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 263-283). New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339-375.
29.
Jost, J.T., Napier, J.L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S.D., Palfai, T.P., & Ostafin, B. ( 2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989-1007.
30.
Jost, J.T., Nosek, B.A., & Gosling, S.D. ( 2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 3(2), 126-136.
31.
Koenig, L.B., & Bouchard, T.J. , Jr. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on the traditional moral values triad- Authoritarianism, conservatism and religiousness-as assessed by quantitative behavior genetic methods. In P. McNamara (Ed.), Where God and science meet: How brain and evolutionary studies alter our understanding of religion (Vol. 1, pp. 31-60). Westport, CT: Praeger.
32.
Landau, M., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., . . . Cook, A. ( 2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1136-1150.
33.
Lippa, R., & Arad, S. ( 1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463-493.
34.
MacKinnon, D., Lockwood, C., Hoffman, J., West, S., & Sheets, V. ( 2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104.
35.
McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T. ( 1997). Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience . In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 825-847). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
Moskowitz, G.B., Gollwitzer, P.M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. ( 1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(1), 167-184.
37.
Mount, M.K., Barrick, M.R., & Strauss, J.P. ( 1994). Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272-280.
38.
Nettle, D. ( 2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622-631.
39.
Nettle, D. ( 2007). Empathizing and systemizing: What are they, and what do they contribute to our understanding of psychological sex differences? British Journal of Psychology, 98(2), 237-256.
40.
Roberts, B.W., Chernyshenko, O.S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L.R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires . Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103-140.
41.
Rokeach, M. ( 1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
42.
Soto, C.J., & John, O. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84-90.
