Psychological distance has been shown to influence how people construe an event such that greater distance produces high-level construal (characterized by global or holistic processing) and lesser distance produces low-level construal (characterized by detailed or feature-based processing). The present research tested the hypothesis that construal level has carryover effects on how information about an event is retrieved from memory. Two experiments manipulated temporal distance and found that greater distance (high-level construal) improves face recognition and increases retrieval of the abstract features of an event, whereas lesser distance (low-level construal) impairs face recognition and increases retrieval of the concrete details of an event. The findings have implications for transfer-inappropriate processing accounts of face recognition and event memory, and suggest potential applications in forensic settings.
Adaval, R., & Wyer, R.S. ( 2004). Communicating about a social interaction: Effects on memory for protagonists’ statements and nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 450-465.
2.
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. ( 1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
3.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. ( 1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
4.
Behrmann, M., Thomas, C., & Humphreys, K. ( 2006). Seeing it differently: Visual processing in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 258-264.
Förster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. ( 2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177-189.
7.
Fredrickson, B.L. ( 1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300-319.
8.
Fredrickson, B.L. ( 2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
9.
Fredrickson, B.L., & Branigan, C. ( 2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 313-332.
10.
Hamilton, D.L., Katz, L.B., & Leirer, V.O. ( 1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1050-1063.
11.
Hunt, C., & Carroll, M.A. ( 2008). Verbal-overshadowing effect: How temporal perspective may exacerbate or alleviate the processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 85-94.
12.
Johnson, K.J., & Fredrickson, B.L. (2005). "We all look the same to me": Positive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychological Science, 16, 875-881.
13.
Lewis, M.B. ( 2006). Eye-witnesses should not do cryptic cross-words prior to identity parades. Perception, 35, 1433-1436.
14.
Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global versus local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 203-216.
15.
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M.D., & Trope, Y. ( 2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523-534.
16.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. ( 2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
17.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. ( 2007). Psychological distance. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Vol. 2. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353-383). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
Macrae, C.N., & Lewis, H.L. ( 2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition . Psychological Science, 13, 194-196.
19.
Malpass, R.S., & Devine, P.G. ( 1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482-489.
20.
Perfect, T.J. ( 2003). Local processing bias impairs lineup performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393-394.
21.
Perfect, T.J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. ( 2007). The effects of local and global processing bias on eyewitness identification performance. Memory, 15, 784-798.
22.
Perfect, T.J., Weston, N., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. ( 2008). The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1479-1486.
23.
Schooler, J.W. ( 2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-998.
24.
Schooler, J.W., & Engstler-Schooler, T.Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. ( 2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83-95.
27.
Wakslak, C., & Trope, Y. ( 2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability judgments, Psychological Science, 20, 52-58.
28.
Westerman, D.L., & Larsen, J.D. ( 1997). Verbal overshadowing effect: Evidence for a general shift in processing. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 417-428.
29.
Weston, N.J., & Perfect, T.J. ( 2005). The effects of processing bias on the composite effect . Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1038-1042.
30.
Weston, N.J., Perfect, T.J., Schooler, J., & Dennis, I. ( 2008). Navon processing and verbalization: A holistic/featural distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 587-611.
31.
Winter, L., & Uleman, J.S. ( 1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 47, 237-252.
32.
Wyer, R.S., Jr., Bodenhausen, G.V., & Srull, T.K. ( 1984). The cognitive representation of persons and groups and its effects on recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 445-469.
33.
Yin, R.K. ( 1969). Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
34.
Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D.C. ( 1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.
