Evolutionary psychological theories assume that sexual aversions toward kin are triggered by a nonconscious mechanism that estimates the genetic relatedness between self and other. This article presents an alternative perspective that assumes that incest avoidance arises from consciously acknowledged taboos and that when awareness of the relationship between self and other is bypassed, people find individuals who resemble their kin more sexually appealing. Three experiments demonstrate that people find others more sexually attractive if they have just been subliminally exposed to an image of their opposite-sex parent (Experiment 1) or if the face being rated is a composite image based on the self (Experiment 2). This finding is reversed when people are aware of the implied genetic relationship (Experiment 3). These findings have implications for a century-old debate between E. Westermarck and S. Freud, as well as contemporary research on evolution, mate choice, and sexual imprinting.
Aron, A., Norman, C.C., Aron, E.N., McKenna, C., & Heyman, R.E. ( 2000). Couples’ shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 273-284.
4.
Bateson, P. ( 1982). Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature, 295, 236-237.
5.
Bateson, P. ( 1983). Optimal outbreeding. In P. Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice (pp. 257-277). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bateson, P. ( 2004). Inbreeding avoidance and incest taboos. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century (pp. 34-37). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., Koves, P., & Bernath, L. ( 2002). Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 677-690.
8.
Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., & Weisfeld, G.E. (2004). Sexual imprinting in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B , 271, 1129-1134.
9.
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. ( 1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 157-215). New York, NY: Academic Press.
10.
Bittles, A.H. ( 2004). Genetic aspects of inbreeding and incest. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century (pp. 38-60). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Bornstein, R.F. ( 1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
12.
Bowlby, J. ( 1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P.J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Brumbaugh, C.C., & Fraley, R.C. ( 2006). Transference and attachment: How do attachment patterns get carried forward from one relationship to the next? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 552-560.
15.
Call, V., Sprecher, S., & Schwartz, P. ( 1995). The incidence and frequency of marital sex in a national sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 639-652.
16.
DeBruine, L.M. ( 2002). Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 1307-1312.
17.
Diamond, J. ( 1992). The third chimpanzee. New York, NY : Basic Books.
18.
Frazer, J.G. ( 1910). Totemism and exogamy. London, UK: Rowe.
19.
Freud, S. ( 1953). Totem and taboo. In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 13, pp. 1-161). London, UK: Hogarth. (Original work published 1913)
20.
Greenwald, A.G. ( 1992). New Look 3: Unconscious cognition reclaimed. American Psychologist, 47, 766-779.
21.
Haidt, J., Koller, S.H., & Dias, M.G. ( 1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613-628.
22.
Immelmann, K. ( 1972). Sexual and other long-term aspects of imprinting in birds and other species. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 147-174). New York, NY: Academic Press.
23.
James, W.H. ( 1981). The honeymoon effect on marital coitus. Journal of Sex Research, 17, 114-123.
24.
Kunst-Wilson, W.R., & Zajonc, R.B. ( 1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized . Science, 207, 557-558.
25.
Langlois, J.H., & Roggman, L.A. ( 1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115-121.
26.
Lieberman, D., & Symons, D. ( 1998). Sibling incest avoidance: From Westermarck to Wolf. Quarterly Review of Biology, 73, 463-466.
27.
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments regarding incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London B, 270, 819-826.
28.
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. ( 2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727-731.
29.
Moreland, R.L., & Beach, S.R. ( 1992). Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 28, 255-276.
30.
Penton-Voak, I.S., Perrett, D.I., & Peirce, J.W. ( 1999). Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgments of attractiveness. Current Psychology, 18, 104-117.
31.
Pusey, A. ( 2004). Inbreeding avoidance in primates. In A. P. Wolf & W. H. Durham (Eds.), Inbreeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century (pp. 61-75). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N. & Winkielman, P. ( 2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 364-382.
33.
Richardson, P.J., & Boyd, R. ( 2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
Saegert, S., Swap, W., & Zajonc, R.B. ( 1973). Exposure, context, and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 234-242.
35.
Schmitt, D.P., & Pilcher, J.J. ( 2004). Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one? Psychological Science, 15, 643-649.
36.
Shepher, J. ( 1971). Mate selection among second generation kibbutz adolescents and adults: Incest avoidance and negative imprinting. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1, 293-307.
37.
Shepher, J. ( 1983) Incest: A biosocial view. New York, NY: Academic Press.
38.
Westermarck, E. ( 1921). The history of human marriage (5th ed.). London, UK: Allerton. (Original work published 1891)
39.
Wolf, A.P. ( 1995). Sexual attraction and childhood association: A Chinese brief for Edward Westermarck. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
40.
Wolf, A. P., & Durham, W. H. (Eds.) (2004). Inbreeeding, incest, and the incest taboo: The state of knowledge at the turn of the century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
Zajonc, R., Adelmann, P., Murphy, S., & Niedenthal, P. (1987). Convergence in the physical appearance of spouses. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 335-346.
