Direct Contact as a Moderator of Extended Contact Effects: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Impact on Outgroup Attitudes,Behavioral Intentions,and Attitude Certainty
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online December, 2010
Direct Contact as a Moderator of Extended Contact Effects: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Impact on Outgroup Attitudes,Behavioral Intentions,and Attitude Certainty
Cross-group friendships (the most effective form of direct contact) and extended contact (i.e., knowing ingroup members who have outgroup friends) constitute two of the most important means of improving outgroup attitudes. Using cross-sectional and longitudinal samples from different intergroup contexts, this research demonstrates that extended contact is most effective when individuals live in segregated neighborhoods having only few, or no, direct friendships with outgroup members. Moreover, by including measures of attitudes and behavioral intentions the authors showed the broader impact of these forms of contact, and, by assessing attitude certainty as one dimension of attitude strength, they tested whether extended contact can lead not only to more positive but also to stronger outgroup orientations. Cross-sectional data showed that direct contact was more strongly related to attitude certainty than was extended contact, but longitudinal data showed both forms of contact affected attitude certainty in the long run.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Allport, G.W. ( 1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Cairns, E., & Hewstone, M. ( 2005). Northern Ireland: Ingroup pride and outgroup prejudice . In I. Stewart & R. Vaitilingam (Eds.), Seven deadly sins: A new look at society through an old lens (pp. 8-12). London, England: Economic and Social Research Council.
4.
Cameron, L., & Rutland, A. ( 2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice towards the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469-488.
5.
Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. ( 2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208-1219.
6.
Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. ( 2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172-177.
7.
Eaton, A.A., Majka, E.A., & Visser, P.S. ( 2008). Emerging perspectives on the structure and function of attitude strength. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 165-201). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
8.
Fazio, R.H. ( 1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviour: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). Orlando, FL : Academic Press.
9.
Fazio, R.H., & Zanna, M.P. ( 1978). On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence. Journal of Personality, 46, 228-243.
10.
Fazio, R.H., & Zanna, M.P. ( 1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161-202). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Gallagher, A.M. ( 1995). The approach of government: Community relations and equity . In S. Dunn (Ed.), Facets of the conflict in Northern Ireland (pp. 27-43). New York, NY : St. Martin’s.
14.
Hewstone, M. ( 2009). Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, 243-300.
15.
Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. ( 1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the "contact hypothesis." In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16.
Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Kenworthy, J., Hughes, J., Tausch, N., Voci, A., . . . Pinder, C. ( 2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup contact, forgiveness and trust. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 199-226). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
17.
Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., Paolini, S., McLernon, F., Crisp, R., & Niens, U. ( 2005). Intergroup contact in a divided society: Challenging segregation in Northern Ireland. In D. Abrams , J. M. Marques, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion (pp. 265-292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
18.
Hewstone, M., & Stroebe, W. ( 2009). Social psychology in our time: From "fun and games" to grown-up science. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Inside psychology: A science over 50 years (pp. 137-149). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19.
Hewstone, M., Tausch, N., Hughes, J., & Cairns, E. ( 2008). Can contact promote better relations? Evidence from mixed and segregated areas of Belfast (Report to the Community Relations Unit, Northern Ireland). Retrieved from http://www.ofmdfmni.gov.uk/gr-pubs
20.
Hodson, G. ( 2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (socially dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325-351.
21.
Hodson, G., Harry, H., & Mitchell, A. ( 2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals . European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 509-525.
22.
Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chuang, Y.C., Berent, M.K., & Carnot, C.G. ( 1993). Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs ? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1132-1151.
23.
Krosnick, J.A., & Petty, R.E. ( 1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
Liebkind, K., & McAlister, A.L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765-780.
25.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. ( 2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
26.
Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
27.
Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. ( 1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245.
28.
Niens, U., Cairns, E., & Hewstone, M. ( 2003). Contact and conflict in Northern Ireland. In O. Hargie & D. Dickson (Eds.), Researching the troubles: Social science perspectives on the Northern Ireland conflict (pp. 123-40). Edinburgh, Scotland: Mainstream.
29.
Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Branch. ( 2002). Census 2001 population report and mid-year estimates . Norwich, UK: HSMO.
30.
Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., & Cairns, E. ( 2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendship effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective-cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406-1420.
31.
Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. ( 2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770-786.
32.
Pettigrew, T.F. ( 1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
Pettigrew, T.F., Christ, O., Wagner, U., & Stellmacher, J. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411-425.
35.
Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L. ( 2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
36.
Poole, M., & Doherty, P. ( 1996). Ethnic residential segregation in Northern Ireland. Coleraine, Northern Ireland: University of Ulster.
37.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137-174.
38.
Schafer, J.L., & Graham, J.W. ( 2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
39.
Schmid, K., Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Hughes, J. ( 2008). The effects of living in segregated vs. mixed areas in Northern Ireland: A simultaneous analysis of contact and threat effects in the context of micro-level neighborhoods. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 56-71.
40.
Schütz, H., & Six, B. ( 1996). How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 441-462.
41.
Shirlow, P., & Murtagh, B. ( 2006). Belfast: Segregation, violence and the city. London, England: Pluto.
42.
Smith, A. ( 1995). Education and the conflict in Northern Ireland. In S. Dunn (Ed.), Facets of the conflict in Northern Ireland (pp. 168-186). New York, NY : St. Martin’s.
43.
Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. ( 2005). Auslaendische Bevoelkerung [Foreign population]. Retrieved from http://www.statistik-portal.de/Statistik-Portal/de_jb01_jahrtab2.asp
44.
Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. ( 1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-176.
45.
Talaska, C.A., Fiske, S.T., & Chaiken, S. ( 2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263-296.
46.
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J.B., & Cairns, E. ( 2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45-59.
47.
Tausch, N., & Hewstone, M. (2010). Intergroup contact and prejudice . In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick , & V. M. Esses (Eds.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 544-560). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. ( 2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369-388.
49.
Turner, R.N., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., Paolini, S., & Christ, O. ( 2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 212-255). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
50.
Turner, R., Hewstone, M., Voci, A., & Vonofakou, C. ( 2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843-860.
51.
van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Pettigrew, T.F., Christ, O., Wolf, C., Petzel, T., . . . Jackson, J.S. ( 2004). The role of perceived importance in intergroup contact . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 211-227.
52.
Visser, P.S., & Mirabile, R.R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795.
53.
Vonofakou, C., Hewstone, M., & Voci, A. ( 2007). Contact with outgroup friends as a predictor of meta-attitudinal strength and accessibility of attitudes towards gay men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 804-820.
54.
Wagner, U., Christ, O., & Pettigrew, T.F. (2008). Prejudice and group related behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 403-416.
55.
Wagner, U., Christ, O., Pettigrew, T.F., Stellmacher, J., & Wolf, C. ( 2006). Prejudice and minority proportion: Contact instead of threat effects. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 380-390.
56.
Wagner, U., van Dick, R., Pettigrew, T.F., & Christ, O. ( 2003). Ethnic prejudice in East and West Germany: The explanatory power of intergroup contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 22-36.
57.
Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., & Ropp, S.A. ( 1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.
