Four studies used experimental and correlational methods to investigate the effect of a “partner-achievement goal,” or a personal goal for a relationship partner’s successful achievement. This goal led support providers to offer unhelpful support about how to play a computer game (Study 1). It also predicted poor achievement for dieting support recipients (Study 2). The effects of partner-achievement goals were moderated by recipient expectations of success and mediated by recipient effort. Recipients with low expectations of their own success requested that their provider partners with partner-achievement goals refrain from offering them support (Study 3); they also invested less time studying Latin grammar and learned fewer Latin words over one week (Study 4). Together, these findings highlight the unique behavioral consequences of partner-achievement goals for both members of a relationship.
Acitelli, L.K., & Antonucci, T.C. (1994). Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 688-698.
2.
Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T., Mashek, D., Lewandowski, G., Wright, S.C., & Aron, E.N. ( 2004). Including others in the self. Hove, UK: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
3.
Bandura, A. ( 1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
4.
Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. ( 2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458-475.
5.
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R.C. ( 2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953-961.
6.
Brunstein, J.C. ( 1993). Personal goals and subjective well-being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1061-1070.
7.
Chartrand, T.L., Dalton, A.N., & Fitzsimons, G.J. (2007). Non-conscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719-726.
8.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T.A. ( 1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis . Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
9.
Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. ( 2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555-575.
10.
Cutrona, C.E. ( 1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching . Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 3-14.
11.
Cutrona, C.E. ( 1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Feeney, B.C. ( 2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631-648.
13.
Feeney, B.C., & Collins, N.L. ( 2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950-968.
14.
Fisher, J.D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reactions to aid. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 27-54.
15.
Gable, S.L., Gonzaga, G.C., & Strachman, A. ( 2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904-917.
16.
Garland, H., & Newport, S. ( 1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
17.
Gleason, M.E.J., Iida, M., Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. ( 2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824-838.
18.
Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R.G., Buunk, B.P., DeJong, G.M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. ( 2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it most?Health Psychology, 19, 274-282.
19.
Hebl, M.R., & Mannix, L.M. ( 2003). The weight of obesity in evaluating others: A mere proximity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 28-38.
20.
Horowitz, L.M., Krasnoperova, E.N., Tatar, D.G., Hansen, M.B., Person, E.A., Galvin, K.L., & Nelson, K.L. ( 2001). The way to console may depend on the goal: Experimental studies of social support. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 49-61.
21.
Huber, P.J. ( 1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimation under nonstandard conditions. In L. M. LeCam & J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 221-233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Brickman, P. ( 1982). Expectations and what people learn from failure. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 207-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Khan, C.M., Iida, M., Stephens, M.A.P., Fekete, E.M., Druley, J.A., & Greene, K.A. ( 2009). Spousal support following knee surgery: Roles of self-efficacy and perceived emotional responsiveness. Rehabilitation Psychology , 54, 28-32.
24.
Kumashiro, M., Rusbult, C.E., Wolf, S.T., & Estrada, M. ( 2006). The Michelangelo phenomenon: Partner affirmation and self-movement toward one’s ideal. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 317-341). New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
Lessard, J., Greenberger, E., & Chen, C. ( 2010). Adolescents’ response to parental efforts to influence eating habits: When parental warmth matters. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 73-83.
26.
Maisel, N.C., & Gable, S.L. ( 2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20, 928-932.
27.
Manne, S., & Glassman, M. ( 2000). Perceived control, coping efficacy, and avoidance coping as mediators between spousal unsupportive behaviors and psychological distress . Health Psychology, 19, 155-164.
28.
Muller, D., Judd, C.M., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. ( 2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
29.
Nadler, A., Fisher, J.D., & Itzhak, S.B. ( 1983). With a little help from my friend: Effect of single or multiple act aid as a function of donor and task characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 310-321.
30.
Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. ( 2006). Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification, and type of help on receptivity to high-status group’s help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91, 97-110.
31.
Pearce, J.W., LeBow, M.D., & Orchard, J. ( 1981). Role of spouse involvement in the behavioral treatment of overweight women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 49, 236-244.
32.
Penny, H., & Haddock, G. ( 2007). Children’s stereotypes of overweight children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 409-418.
33.
Reis, H.T., Clark, M.S., & Holmes, J.G. ( 2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In D. J. Mashek & A. P. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Shah, J. ( 2003a). Automatic for the people: How representations of significant others implicitly affect goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 661-681.
35.
Shah, J. ( 2003b). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424-439.
36.
Shrout, P.E., Bolger, N., Iida, M., Burke, C., Gleason, M.E.J., & Lane, S.P. ( 2010). The effects of daily support transactions during acute stress: Results from a diary study of bar exam preparation. In K. Sullivan & J. Davila (Eds.), Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 175-199). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
Taylor, S.E. ( 2007). Social support. In H. S. Friedman & R. C. Silver (Eds.), Foundations of health psychology (pp. 145-171). New York, NY : Oxford University Press.
38.
Tracey, D.H., & Young, J.W. ( 2002). Mothers’ helping behaviors during children’s at-home oral-reading practice: Effects of children’s reading ability, children’s gender, and mothers’ educational level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 729-737.
39.
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R.M. ( 2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222-244.
