Theories of visionary leadership propose that groups bestow leadership on exceptional group members. In contrast, social identity perspectives claim that leadership arises, in part, from a person’s ability to be seen as representative of the group. Integrating these perspectives, the authors propose that effective leaders often share group members’ perspectives concerning the present, yet offer a unique and compelling vision for the group’s future. In addition, although intergroup contexts may increase the value of representativeness, the authors predict that vision dominates representativeness in single-group situations characterized by high levels of collective stress (e.g., a natural disaster). Five studies demonstrated that visionary leaders (those who offer novel solutions to their group’s predicament) attract more followers, promote group identification and intrinsic motivation, mobilize collective action, and effectively regulate group members’ emotions and reactions to crises compared to representative leaders. The authors discuss when, why, and how vision triumphs over representativeness in leader emergence and effectiveness.
Abrams, D., de Moura, G., Marques, J., & Hutchison, P. ( 2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662-678.
2.
Bar-Tal, D. ( 1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management , 9, 22-50.
3.
Bass, B.M. ( 1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
4.
Bass, B.M. ( 2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. ( 1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
6.
Baum, J.R., Locke, E.A., & Kirkpatrick, S.A. (1998). A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 43-54.
7.
Berscheid, E., & Reis, H.T. ( 1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 193-281). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Bono, J., Foldes, H., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. ( 2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership . Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1357-1367.
9.
Bono, J., & Ilies, R. ( 2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 317-334.
10.
Bono, J.E., & Judge, T.A. ( 2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 554-571.
11.
Chemers, M.M. ( 2001). Leadership effectiveness: An integrative review. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 376-399). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
12.
Cialdini, R.B., & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.
13.
Conger, J. ( 1999). Charismatic and transformational leadership in organizations: An insider’s perspective on these developing streams of research. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 145-179.
Cozzolino, P., Staples, A., Meyers, L., & Samboceti, J. ( 2004). Greed, death, and values: From terror management to transcendence management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 30, 278-292.
16.
De Cremer, D., van Dijke, M., & Mayer, D.M. ( 2010). Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: The moderating role of leader prototypicality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1121-1133.
17.
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S.A. ( 2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
18.
Gruenfeld, D.H., & Tiedens, L.Z. ( 2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 1252-1287). New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
Halevy, N., Chou, E., & Galinsky, A.D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how and when hierarchical differentiation enhances group performance . Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32-52.
20.
Halevy, N., Sagiv, L., Roccas, S., & Bornstein, G. ( 2006). Perceiving intergroup conflict: From game models to mental templates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1674-1689.
21.
Haslam, S.A., & Platow, M.J. ( 2001). The link between leadership and followership: How affirming social identity translates vision into action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1469-1479.
22.
Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D., & Platow, M.J. ( 2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
23.
Hofstede, G. ( 1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
25.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2008). Social identity theory of leadership. In C. L. Hoyt, G. R. Goethals , & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Leadership at the cross-roads. Volume 1: Leadership and psychology (pp. 62-77). Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Hogg, M.A. ( 2010). Influence and Leadership. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 1167-1207). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
27.
Hogg, M.A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 1-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
Hollander, E. ( 1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65, 117-127.
29.
House, R.J. ( 1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189-207). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30.
House, R.J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., & Gupta, V. ( 2004). Culture, leadership and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-779.
32.
Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. ( 2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246-254.
33.
Kelman, H.C. ( 2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1-26.
34.
Kirkpatrick, S.A., & Locke, E.A. ( 1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
35.
Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
36.
Platow, M., van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S., van Knippenberg, B., & Spears, R. ( 2006). A special gift we bestow on you for being representative of us: Considering leader charisma from a self-categorization perspective . British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 303-320.
37.
Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. ( 2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879.
38.
Reicher, S.D. ( 2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182-208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
39.
Reicher, S., Haslam, S.A., & Hopkins, N. ( 2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality . Leadership Quarterly, 16, 547-568.
40.
Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N., & Eidelson, R. ( 2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280.
41.
Shamir, B., House, R.J., & Arthur, M.B. ( 1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
42.
Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. ( 1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates’ attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors’ appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal , 41, 387-409.
43.
Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. ( 1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
44.
Turner, J.C. ( 2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory . European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-22.
45.
Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & McGarty, C. ( 1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
46.
van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., De Cremer, D., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825-856.
47.
Waldman, D.A., Ramirez, G.G., House, R.J., & Puranam, P. ( 2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 134-143.
48.
Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
