Committed Dis(s)idents: Participation in Radical Collective Action Fosters Disidentification With the Broader In-Group But Enhances Political Identification
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online August, 2011
Committed Dis(s)idents: Participation in Radical Collective Action Fosters Disidentification With the Broader In-Group But Enhances Political Identification
The present research examined the hypothesis that participation in radical, but not moderate, action results in disidentification from the broader in-group. Study 1 (N = 98) was a longitudinal study conducted in the context of student protests against tuition fees in Germany and confirmed that participation in radical collective action results in disidentification with the broader in-group (students) whereas participation in moderate collective action does not. Both types of action increased politicized identification. Study 2 (N = 175) manipulated the normativeness of different types of imagined collective actions in the same context and replicated this disidentification effect for radical actions, but only when this action mismatched the broader in-group’s norms. This study also indicated that these effects were partially mediated by perceived lack of solidarity and perceived lack of commitment to the cause among the broader in-group. The implications of these findings for understanding radicalization within social movements are discussed.
Brewer, M.B. ( 2001). Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In R. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Wilder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction (pp. 2-41). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. ( 1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
3.
Corning, A.F., & Myers, D.J. ( 2002). Individual orientation toward engagement in social action . Political Psychology, 23, 703-729.
4.
Crisp, R.J., & Turner, R.N. ( 2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231-240.
5.
DeWeerd, M., & Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and political protest: Farmers’ protest in the Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1073-1095.
6.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S.D. ( 1999). The intergroup dynamics of collective empowerment: Substantiating the social identity model of crowd behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 381-402.
7.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S.D. ( 2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35-58.
8.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
9.
Elsbach, K.D., & Bhattacharya, C.B. (2001). Defining who you are by what you’re not: Organizational disidentification and the National Rifle Organization. Organization Science, 12, 393-413.
10.
English, R. ( 2003). Armed struggle: The history of the IRA. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Garcia, S.M., Weaver, K., Moskowitz, G.B., & Darley, J.M. ( 2002). Crowded minds: The implicit bystander effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 843-853.
12.
Glasford, D.E., Pratto, F., & Dovidio, J.F. ( 2008). Intragroup dissonance: Responses to ingroup violation of personal values. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 44, 1057-1064.
13.
Greenwood, J.D. ( 1989). Explanation and experiment in social psychological science: Realism and the social constitution of action. New York, NY: Springer.
14.
Hayes, B.C., & McAllister, I. (2001). "Sowing dragon’s teeth": Public support for political violence and paramilitarism in Northern Ireland. Political Studies, 49, 901-922.
15.
Isseroff, A. ( 2003, August 22). Speaking out for Palestine and peace. Retrieved from http://www.mideastweb.org/palandpeace.htm
16.
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., & Solheim, E. ( 2009). To identify or not to identify? National disidentification as an alternative reaction to perceived ethnic discrimination. Applied Psychology, 58, 105-128.
17.
Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 41-57.
18.
Leach, C.W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M.L.W., Pennekamp, S.F., Doosje, B., . . . Spears, R. ( 2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
19.
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. ( 2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence , 21, 239-260.
20.
Muslim Council of Britain. (2007, July 2). Rejecting terror. Retrieved from http://www.mcb.org.uk/article_detail.php?article=announcement-656
Reicher, S.D. ( 1996). The battle of Westminster: Developing the social identity model of crowd behavior in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology , 26, 115-134.
23.
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. ( 1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645.
24.
Schmiedekampf, K. ( 2007, August 28). Protest gegen Studiengebühren. Harte Strafen für Autobahnblockierer [Protest against tuition fees. Severe sentences for highway blocker]. Der Spiegel. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/studium/0,1518,502442,00.html .
25.
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist , 56, 319-331.
26.
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. ( 2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 263-277.
27.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
28.
Tausch, N., Becker, J.C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R.N. (in press). Explaining radical group behaviour: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and non-normative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
29.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
30.
Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & McGarty, C.A. ( 1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
31.
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. ( 2008). Toward an integrated social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives . Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
32.
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A.H., & Leach, C.W. ( 2004). Put you money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
33.
White, J.B., & Langer, E.J. ( 1999). Horizontal hostility: Relations between similar minority groups. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 537-559.
34.
White, J.B., Schmitt, M., & Langer, E.J. ( 2006). Horizontal hostility: Multiple minority groups and differentiation from the mainstream. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 9, 339-358.
35.
Wright, S.C. ( 2001). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 409-430). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
36.
Wright, S.C. ( 2009). The next generation of collective action research. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 859-879.
37.
Wright, S.C., Taylor, D.M., & Moghaddam, F.M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
