Gender Prototypes Hinder Bystander Intervention in Women’s Sexual Harassment

Abstract

Bystander intervention is a powerful response to sexual harassment that reduces victims’ burden to respond. However, gender prototypes depicting sexual harassment victims as prototypical women (i.e., stereotypically feminine) may hinder intervention when harassment targets women who deviate from this prototype. Across four preregistered experiments (N = 1,270 Americans), we test whether bystanders intervene less readily in nonprototypical (vs. prototypical) women’s sexual harassment. Participants observed a man manager ask a series of increasingly sexually harassing job interview questions toward either a gender prototypical or nonprototypical woman by traits (Studies 1–3) or gender identity (Study 4). Participants were instructed to intervene to stop the interview if/when they judged the questions as inappropriate. A meta-analysis revealed participants had a greater threshold for intervention when harassment targeted a nonprototypical (vs. prototypical) woman—a small but meaningful effect. Efforts to foster bystander intervention in sexual harassment would benefit by recognizing this neglect of nonprototypical women.

Keywords

sexual harassment/violence gender stereotyping prejudice/stereotyping sexism helping/prosocial behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashburn-Nardo

Morris

K. A.

Goodwin

S. A.

(2008). The confronting prejudiced responses (CPR) model: Applying CPR in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251671

Berdahl

J. L.

(2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425

Bergman

M. E.

Langhout

R. D.

Palmieri

P. A.

Cortina

L. M.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(2002). The (un) reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.230

Brassel

S. T.

Settles

I. H.

Buchanan

N. T.

(2019). Lay (mis) perceptions of sexual harassment toward transgender, lesbian, and gay employees. Sex Roles, 80, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0914-8

Burns

(2019, September 5). The rise of anti-trans “radical” feminists, explained. Vox. https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/9/5/20840101/terfs-radical-feminists-gender-critical

Callander

Wiggins

Rosenberg

Cornelisse

V. J.

Duck-Chong

Holt

Pony

Vlahakis

MacGibbon

Cook

(2019). The 2018 Australian trans and gender diverse sexual health survey: Report of findings. The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney. https://www.kirby.unsw.edu.au/research/reports/2018-australian-trans-and-gender-diverse-sexual-health-survey-report-findings

Cassino

(2018, February 21). Sexual harassment claims have fallen among young white women, but not older women or black women. Harvard Business Review.

Champely

Ekstrom

Dalgaard

Gill

Weibelzahl

Anandkumar

Ford

Volcic

De Rosario

(2017). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pwr/

Chan

D. K.

Chow

S. Y.

Lam

C. B.

Cheung

S. F.

(2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x

10.

Cihangir

Barreto

Ellemers

(2014). Men as allies against sexism: The positive effects of a suggestion of sexism by male (vs. female) sources. Sage Open, 4(2), 2158244014539168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014539168

11.

Clarke

J. A.

(2013). Inferring desire. Dukeminier Awards: Best Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law Review, 14, 525–635.

12.

Cortina

L. M.

Magley

V. J.

(2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8(4), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.8.4.247

13.

Crenshaw

(1991). Race, gender, and sexual harassment. Southern California Law Review, 65(3), 1467–1476.

14.

Crenshaw

(2019). We still have not learned from Anita Hill’s testimony. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 26(1), 17–20.

15.

Czopp

A. M.

Monteith

M. J.

(2003). Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(4), 532–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202250923

16.

Danna

G. C.

Hernandez

Mahabir

Nandigama

Cheung

H. K.

(2020). Who else besides (White) women? The need for representation in harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 208–212. http://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.38

17.

Diekman

A. B.

Eagly

A. H.

(2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001

18.

Dobbin

Kalev

(2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, 94(7), 1–10.

19.

Dobbin

Kalev

(2019). The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(25), 12255–12260. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181847711

20.

Dobbin

Kalev

(2020). Making discrimination and harassment complaint systems better. In Pedulla

(Ed.), What works? Evidence-based ideas to increase diversity, equity, and inclusion in the workplace (pp. 24–29). Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study.

21.

Drury

B. J.

Kaiser

C. R.

(2014). Allies against sexism: The role of men in confronting sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083

22.

Edelman

L. B.

Cabrera

(2020). Sex-based harassment and symbolic compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16(1), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-031820-122129

23.

Estevan-Reina

de Lemus

Megías

J. L.

(2020). Feminist or paternalistic: Understanding men’s motivations to confront sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2988. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02988

24.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

(2017). Still the last great open secret: Sexual harassment as systemic trauma. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 18(4), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2017.1309143

25.

Fitzgerald

L. F.

Cortina

L. M.

(2018). Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. In Travis

C. B

White

J. W.

Rutherford

Williams

W. S.

Cook

S. L.

Wyche

K. F.

(Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives (pp. 215–234). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-012

26.

Gajanan

(2017, October 17). “Everybody f–king knew.” Screenwriter Scott Rosenberg unleashes on Harvey Weinstein. Time. https://time.com/4985551/scott-rosenberg-facebook-harvey-weinstein/

27.

Gallagher

N. M.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2021). Gender essentialism and the mental representation of transgender women and men: A multimethod investigation of stereotype content. Cognition, 217, Article 104887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104887

28.

Gervais

S. J.

Hillard

A. L.

Vescio

T. K.

(2010). Confronting sexism: The role of relationship orientation and gender. Sex Roles, 63, 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9838-7

29.

Glick

Fiske

S. T.

(2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

30.

Goh

J. X.

Bandt-Law

Cheek

N. N.

Sinclair

Kaiser

C. R.

(2022). Narrow prototypes and neglected victims: Understanding perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000260

31.

Good

J. J.

Moss-Racusin

C. A.

Sanchez

D. T.

(2012). When do we confront? Perceptions of costs and benefits predict confronting discrimination on behalf of the self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312440958

32.

Gulker

J. E.

Mark

A. Y.

Monteith

M. J.

(2013). Confronting prejudice: The who, what, and why of confrontation effectiveness. Social Influence, 8(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.736879

33.

Helgeson

V. S.

(1994). Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544286

34.

Higgins

J. P. T.

Thomas

Chandler

Cumpston

Page

M. J.

Welch

V. A.

(Eds.). (2022). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3. Cochrane. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

35.

Hildebrand

L. K.

Jusuf

C. C.

Monteith

M. J.

(2020). Ally confrontations as identity-safety cues for marginalized individuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1318–1333. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2692

36.

Ilies

Hauserman

Schwochau

Stibal

(2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 607–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x

37.

Joyce

(2022, July 6). Chicago sexual harassment policy requires “bystander” training. Bloomberg Law. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/chicago-sexual-harassment-policy-requires-bystander-training

38.

Kaiser

C. R.

Bandt-Law

Cheek

N. N.

Schachtman

(2022). Gender prototypes shape perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721422107859

39.

Kaiser

C. R.

Major

(2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law & Social Inquiry, 31(4), 801–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00036.x

40.

Kaltiala

Ellonen

(2022). Transgender identity and experiences of sexual harassment in adolescence. Child Abuse Review, 31(4), Article e2748. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2748

41.

Latané

Darley

J. M.

(1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

42.

Lee

S. Y.

Hanson

M. D.

Cheung

H. K.

(2019). Incorporating bystander intervention into sexual harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2019.8

43.

Leskinen

E. A.

Cortina

L. M.

Kabat

D. B.

(2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5

44.

Leskinen

E. A.

Rabelo

V. C.

Cortina

L. M.

(2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A “catch-22” for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000040

45.

MacKinnon

C. A.

(1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination (Vol. 19). Yale University Press.

46.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Fairchild

A. J.

Fritz

M. S.

(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542

47.

Major

Quinton

W. J.

McCoy

S. K.

(2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In Zanna

M. P.

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80007-7

48.

Mallett

R. K.

Ford

T. E.

Woodzicka

J. A.

(2021). Ignoring sexism increases women’s tolerance of sexual harassment. Self and Identity, 20(7), 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1678519

49.

McDonald

Charlesworth

Graham

(2016). Action or inaction: Bystander intervention in workplace sexual harassment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(5), 548–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1023331

50.

Milgram

(1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525

51.

Moser

C. E.

Branscombe

N. R.

(2021). Male allies at work: Gender-equality supportive men reduce negative underrepresentation effects among women. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211033748

52.

O’Leary-Kelly

A. M.

Paetzold

R. L.

Griffin

R. W.

(2000). Sexual harassment as aggressive behavior: An actor-based perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/259019

53.

Paganini

G. A.

McConnell

A. A.

Deska

J. C.

Almaraz

S. M.

Hugenberg

Lloyd

E. P.

(2023). Waist-to-hip ratio predicts sexual perception and responses to sexual assault disclosures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221148008

54.

Prentice

D. A.

Carranza

(2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066

55.

Purdie-Vaughns

Eibach

R. P.

(2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4

56.

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

57.

Shelton

J. N.

Stewart

R. E.

(2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x

58.

Sojo

V. E.

Wood

R. E.

Genat

A. E.

(2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315599346

59.

Swim

J. K.

Hyers

L. L.

(1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1370

60.

Tingley

Yamamoto

Hirose

Keele

Imai

(2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05

61.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (n.d.). Sexual harassment. https://www.eeoc.gov/sexual-harassment

62.

Viechtbauer

(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

63.

Wells

G. L.

Windschitl

P. D.

(1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(9), 1115–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512005

64.

Willness

C. R.

Steel

Lee

(2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x

65.

Woodzicka

J. A.

LaFrance

(2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00199

66.

Woodzicka

J. A.

LaFrance

(2005). The effects of subtle sexual harassment on women’s performance in a job interview. Sex Roles, 53(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4279-4

67.

Zidenberg

A. M.

Sparks

Harkins

Lidstone

S. K.

(2021). Tipping the scales: Effects of gender, rape myth acceptance, and anti-fat attitudes on judgments of sexual coercion scenarios. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, NP10178–NP10204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519872978

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB