Social Class,Control,and Culture: Individuals with Low Socioeconomic Status Perceive Less Control in Relationally Immobile Societies

Abstract

Studies have shown that individuals with high socioeconomic status (SES) perceive a greater sense of control than those with lower SES. However, no studies have examined how sociocultural contexts affect perceived control of individuals from different SES backgrounds. Studies 1 and 2 found that the association between SES and sense of control was stronger in countries with low relational mobility (e.g. East Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa) compared to those with high relational mobility (e.g. Latin America), largely due to lower perceived control among low-SES individuals in immobile societies. Study 3 demonstrated that self-reported relational mobility mediated the cross-country differences in SES-control associations. Study 4 experimentally manipulated relational mobility to establish its causal effect on the SES-control association. These findings suggest that social environments that afford less-flexible social networks exacerbate SES disparities in perceived control and highlight how social ecology may disproportionately impact individuals with lower SES.

Keywords

social class socioeconomic status sense of control perceived control relational mobility culture

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adler

N. E.

Epel

E. S.

Castellazzo

Ickovics

J. R.

(2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586

Ajzen

(2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x

E. W. M.

Chiu

C.-y.

Zhang

Z.-X.

Mallorie

Chaturvedi

Viswanathan

Savani

(2012). Negotiable fate: Social ecological foundation and psychological functions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(6), 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111421632

Bailis

D. S.

Segall

Mahon

M. J.

Chipperfield

J. G.

Dunn

E. M.

(2001). Perceived control in relation to socioeconomic and behavioral resources for health. Social Science & Medicine, 52(11), 1661–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00280-X

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.114610.18637/jss.v067.i01

Buttrick

Cha

Oishi

(2026). Shifts in residential mobility predict shifts in culture. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 52(2), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241280998

Carey

R. M.

Markus

H. R.

(2017). Social class shapes the form and function of relationships and selves. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.031

Chang

J.-H.

Lin

Y.-H.

Huang

K.-J.

(2023). Fate belief, social class, and mental health: A study based on the Taiwan social change survey. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202306_65(2).0002

10.

Cheng

Cheung

S. F.

Chio

J. H.-m.

Chan

M.-P. S.

(2013). Cultural meaning of perceived control: A meta-analysis of locus of control and psychological symptoms across 18 cultural regions. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 152–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028596

11.

Curhan

K. B.

Levine

C. S.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

Park

Karasawa

Kawakami

Love

G. D.

Coe

C. L.

Miyamoto

Ryff

C. D.

(2014). Subjective and objective hierarchies and their relations to psychological well-being: A U.S./Japan comparison. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(8), 855–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614538461

12.

Gallo

L. C.

Bogart

L. M.

Vranceanu

A.-M.

Matthews

K. A.

(2005). Socioeconomic Status, Resources, Psychological Experiences, and Emotional Responses: A Test of the Reserve Capacity Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.386

13.

Granovetter

M. S.

(1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.10.1086/225469

14.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E. W.

(2011). Social class, culture, and cognition. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610377119

15.

Haerpfer

Inglehart

Moreno

Welzel

Kizilova

Diez-Medrano

Lagos

Norris

Ponarin

Puranen

(Eds.). (2022). World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 5.0. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.20

16.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

17.

Hofstede

(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

18.

Hornsey

M. J.

Greenaway

K. H.

Harris

E. A.

Bain

P. G.

(2018). Exploring cultural differences in the extent to which people perceive and desire control. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218780692

19.

Huang

K.-J.

de Almeida

Uchida

Oishi

(2026). Low relational mobility fosters interpersonal indecision through increased sensitivity to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 52(6), 1391–1409. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241312260

20.

International Monetary Fund. (2023). World economic outlook database (October 2023). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/weodata/index.aspx

21.

Johnson

Krueger

R. F.

(2005). Higher perceived life control decreases genetic variance in physical health: Evidence from a national twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.165

22.

Johnson

Krueger

R. F.

(2006). How money buys happiness: Genetic and environmental processes linking finances and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.680

23.

Kito

Yuki

Thomson

(2017). Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross-cultural differences. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12174

24.

Kraus

M. W.

Côté

Keltner

(2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1716–1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610387613

25.

Kraus

M. W.

Piff

P. K.

Keltner

(2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357

26.

Kraus

M. W.

Piff

P. K.

Mendoza-Denton

Rheinschmidt

M. L.

Keltner

(2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756

27.

Krys

de Almeida

Wasiel

Vignoles

V. L.

(2025). WEIRD–Confucian comparisons: Ongoing cultural biases in psychology’s evidence base and some recommendations for improving global representation. American Psychologist, 80(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001298

28.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

29.

Kwan

J. L. Y.

Chan

(2018). Variable system: An alternative approach for the analysis of mediated moderation. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000160

30.

Lachman

M. E.

Weaver

S. L.

(1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.763

31.

Minkov

Dutt

Schachner

Morales

Sanchez

Jandosova

Khassenbekov

Mudd

(2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0197

32.

Miyamoto

Yoo

Levine

C. S.

Park

Boylan

J. M.

Sims

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

Kawakami

Karasawa

Coe

C. L.

Love

G. D.

Ryff

C. D.

(2018). Culture and social hierarchy: Self- and other-oriented correlates of socioeconomic status across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000133

33.

Mori

Hanaki

Kameda

(2024). An outside individual option increases optimism and facilitates collaboration when groups form flexibly. Nature Communications, 15(1), 5520. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49779-9

34.

Morling

Kitayama

Miyamoto

(2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286003

35.

OECD (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en

36.

OECD (2014). PISA 2012 technical report. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2012technicalreport.htm

37.

Oishi

(2014). Socioecological psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 581–609. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-030413-152156

38.

Oishi

Kesebir

Diener

(2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262

39.

Oishi

Schug

Yuki

Axt

(2015). The psychology of residential and relational mobilities. In Gelfand

M. J.

Chiu

C.-Y.

Hong

Y.-Y.

(Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture and psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 221–272). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190218966.003.0005

40.

R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

41.

Rodin

(1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233(4770), 1271–1276. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3749877

42.

Roth

Hahn

Spinath

F. M.

(2017). Income inequality, life satisfaction, and economic worries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(2), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616664955

43.

San Martin

Schug

Maddux

W. W

. (2019). Relational mobility and cultural differences in analytic and holistic thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(4), 495–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000142

44.

Schug

Yuki

Maddux

(2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610382786

45.

Solt

(2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12795

46.

Sommet

Morselli

Spini

(2018). Income inequality affects the psychological health of only the people facing scarcity. Psychological Science, 29(12), 1911–1921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618798620

47.

Sommet

Weissman

D. L.

Cheutin

Elliot

A. J.

(2023). How many participants do I need to test an interaction? Conducting an appropriate power analysis and achieving sufficient power to detect an interaction. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3), Article 25152459231178728. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231178728

48.

Stephens

N. M.

Markus

H. R.

Townsend

S. S. M.

(2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.814

49.

Thomson

Yuki

Talhelm

Schug

Kito

Ayanian

A. H.

Becker

J. C.

Becker

Chiu

C.-y.

Choi

H.-S.

Ferreira

C. M.

Fülöp

Gul

Houghton-Illera

A. M.

Joasoo

Jong

Kavanagh

C. M.

Khutkyy

Manzi

. . . Visserman

M. L.

(2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115

50.

Traynor

Raykov

(2013). Household possessions indices as wealth measures: a validity evaluation. Comparative Education Review, 57(4), 662–688. https://doi.org/10.1086/671423

51.

Triandis

H. C.

(1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview Press.

52.

Yamagishi

Hashimoto

Schug

(2012). Stadtluft Macht Frei (City Air Brings Freedom). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111415407

53.

Yuki

Schug

(2012). Relational mobility: A socioecological approach to personal relationships. In Gillath

Adams

Kunkel

(Eds.), Relationship Science: Integrating Evolutionary, Neuroscience, and Sociocultural Approaches (pp. 137–151). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13489-007

54.

Yuki

Schug

(2020). Psychological consequences of relational mobility. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.029

55.

Yuki

Schug

Horikawa

, et al (2007). Development of a scale to measure perceptions of relational mobility in society. CERSS Working Paper 75, Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University.

56.

Zhang

Zhao

(2021). Relational mobility promotes subjective well-being through control over interpersonal relationships among the Chinese. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12426

57.

Zhu

Yuki

(2024, February). The manipulation of relational mobility [Poster presentation]. Society for Personality and Social Psychology’s Annual Convention, San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22153.66407

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB