Poets Over Quants: Automation and AI Threats Increase the Value People Place on Creativity

Abstract

We examine how perceived automation and AI threats (the belief that advanced technology threatens humans’ career prospects) shape workers’ strategies for career preparation. In nine studies (N = 2,320; three preregistered), we find that perceived automation threat drives people to prioritize creative skills over technical and social skills. A pilot study revealed that people view creativity as less prone to automation and more likely to complement automation. Subsequent experiments confirmed that automation threat leads people to highlight creativity in job applications (Studies 1a–1c), leads STEM students and professional graphic designers to cultivate creative abilities (Studies 2a–2b), and increases jobseekers’ interest in companies that champion creativity (Study 3). People value creative skills in response to the automation threat even when reminded of generative AI’s ability for creativity (Studies 4a–4b). These results suggest that advanced technology steers individuals to prioritize creativity as a skill necessary to compete in the labor market.

Keywords

automation artificial intelligence skill acquisition future of work creativity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acemoglu

Autor

(2011). Skills, tasks, and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In Card

Ashenfelter

(Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1043–1171). Elsevier.

Acemoglu

Restrepo

(2018). The race between man and machine: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares, and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1488–1542.

Acemoglu

Restrepo

(2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30.

Acemoglu

Shimer

(1999). Efficient unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 107(5), 893–928.

Alicke

M. D.

Sedikides

(Eds.). (2011). Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection. Guilford Press.

Allen

(2018, February 7). How digitalization of everything is making us more lonely. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/how-the-digitalisation-of-everything-is-making-us-more-lonely-90870

Amabile

T. M.

(1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

Arntz

Gregory

Zierahn

(2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers).

Autor

D. H.

(2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of economic perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.

10.

Autor

D. H.

Dorn

(2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1553–1597.

11.

Autor

D. H.

Levy

Murnane

R. J.

(2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333.

12.

Backhouse

(2017, December 13). Rise of the robots and all the lonely people. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/13/rise-of-the-robots-and-all-the-lonely-people

13.

Bessen

(2015). Toil and technology: Innovative technology is displacing workers to new jobs rather than replacing them entirely. Finance & Development, 52(1), 16–119.

14.

Bessen

(2019). Automation and jobs: When technology boosts employment. Economic Policy, 34(100), 589–626.

15.

Börner

Scrivner

Gallant

Liu

Chewning

Evans

J. A.

(2018). Skill discrepancies between research, education, and jobs reveal the critical need to supply soft skills for the data economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(50), 12630–12637.

16.

Brynjolfsson

McAfee

(2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and Prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company.

17.

Bullot

N. J.

Reber

(2013). The artful mind meets art history: Toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(2), 123–137.

18.

Burdett

Mortensen

D. T.

(1998). Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. International Economic Review, 39(2), 257–273.

19.

Byrt

Bishop

Carlin

J. B.

(1993). Bias, prevalence, and kappa. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(5), 423–429.

20.

Cremer

Morini

Falk

(2023, April 13). How Generative AI could disrupt creative work. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2023/04/how-generative-ai-could-disrupt-creative-work

21.

Dal Bó

Finan

Folke

Persson

Rickne

. (2018). Economic losers and political winners: Sweden’s radical right [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Political Science, UC Berkeley.

22.

Deming

D. J.

(2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593–1640.

23.

Dietvorst

B. J.

Simmons

J. P.

Massey

(2015). Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 114.

24.

Dweck

C. S.

Chiu

C. Y.

Hong

Y. Y.

(1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.

25.

Fast

N. J.

Schroeder

(2020). Power and decision making: new directions for research in the age of artificial intelligence. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 172–176.

26.

Faul

Erdfelder

Buchner

Lang

A. G.

(2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.

27.

Florida

(2002). Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(1), 55–71.

28.

Frey

C. B.

Berger

Chen

(2018). Political machinery: did robots swing the 2016 US presidential election? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 418–442.

29.

Frey

C. B.

Osborne

M. A.

(2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

30.

Gamez-Djokic

Waytz

(2020). Concerns about automation and negative sentiment toward immigration. Psychological Science, 31(8), 987–1000.

31.

Glaeser

E. L.

Kolko

Saiz

(2001). Consumer city. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1), 27–50.

32.

Goos

Manning

Salomons

(2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526.

33.

Gray

H. M.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619.

34.

Gustein

A. J.

Sviokla

J. J.

(2018, July 17). 7 skills that aren’t about to be automated. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/07/7-skills-that-arent-about-to-be-automated.

35.

Haslam

(2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and social psychology review, 10(3), 252–264.

36.

Horton

C. B.

Jr White

M. W.

Iyengar

S. S.

(2023). Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 19001.

37.

Jackson

J. C.

Castelo

Gray

(2020). Could a rising robot workforce make humans less prejudiced? American Psychologist, 75(7), 969.

38.

Jacobs

(2018, June 20). Can we learn to be flexible? Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/6e4ca98a-72e6-11e8-b6ad-3823e4384287

39.

Jago

A. S.

Carroll

G. R.

Lin

(2022). Generating authenticity in automated work. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(1), 52–70.

40.

Kersten

(2020, September 27). Adaptability: Your most essential workplace skill. Nasdaq. https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/adaptability%3A-your-most-essential-workplace-skill-2020-09-27

41.

Khan

(2019). Commission on Workers and Technology Background briefing note June 2019.

42.

Kosslyn

(2019, September 25). Are you developing skills that won’t be automated? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/09/are-you-developing-skills-that-wont-be-automated

43.

Leary

M. R.

(2007). Motivational and emotional aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 317–344.

44.

Logg

J. M.

Minson

J. A.

Moore

D. A.

(2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103.

45.

Longoni

Bonezzi

K Morewedge

(2018). Consumer reluctance toward medical artificial intelligence: The underlying role of uniqueness neglect. Advances in Consumer Research, 46, 63–67.

46.

Loughnan

Haslam

(2007). Animals and androids: Implicit associations between social categories and nonhumans. Psychological Science, 18(2), 116–121.

47.

Lysyakov

Viswanathan

(2023). Threatened by AI: Analyzing users’ responses to the introduction of AI in a crowd-sourcing platform. Information Systems Research, 34(3), 1191–1210.

48.

MacCrory

Westerman

Alhammadi

Brynjolfsson

(2014). Racing with and against the machine: Changes in occupational skill composition in an era of rapid technological advance. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2014). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2014/proceedings/SocietalImpacts/8/

49.

Mahdawi

(2017, June 27). What jobs will still be around in 20 years? Read this to prepare for your future. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/26/jobs-future-automation-robots-skills-creative-health

50.

Millet

Buehler

Kokkoris

M. D.

(2023). Defending humankind: Anthropocentric bias in the appreciation of AI art. Computers in Human Behavior, 143, 107707.

51.

Molden

D. C.

Dweck

C. S.

(2006). Finding “meaning” in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. American psychologist, 61(3), 192.

52.

Mortensen

D. T.

Pissarides

C. A.

(1994). Job creation and job destruction in the theory of unemployment. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 397–415.

53.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2013, November 18). Science & engineering degree attainment – by gender – 2013. https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-degreeattainment3/

54.

Newman

D. T.

Fast

N. J.

Harmon

D. J.

(2020). When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 149–167.

55.

Office of Management Budget. (2016). Budget of the U.S. government: Fiscal year 2016. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2016-BUD/pdf/BUDGET-2016-BUD.pdf

56.

Paquette

(2018, March 30). American workers are already lonely. Here come the robots. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/03/30/american-workers-are-already-lonely-here-come-the-robots/

57.

Press

(2023, March 6). Generative AI and the future of creative jobs. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2023/03/06/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-creative-jobs/?sh=36e3ee756617

58.

Raveendhran

Fast

N. J.

(2021). Humans judge, algorithms nudge: The psychology of behavior tracking acceptance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 164, 11–26.

59.

Runco

M. A.

(2004). Everyone has creative potential. In Sternberg

R. J.

Grigorenko

E. L.

Singer

J. L.

(Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 21–30). American Psychological Association

60.

Sequeira

Banerjee

(2020). Spatial mismatches and imperfect information in the job search (CEPR Discussion Papers 14414).

61.

Siepel

Camerani

Masucci

(2021). Skills combinations and firm performance. Small Business Economics, 56, 1425–1447.

62.

Sim

Wright

C. C.

(2005). The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical therapy, 85(3), 257–268.

63.

Sternberg

R.J.

(1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.

64.

Tay

B. T. C.

Park

Jung

Tan

Y. K.

Wong

A. H. Y.

(2013, July). When stereotypes meet robots: The effect of gender stereotypes on people’s acceptance of a security robot. In Harris

(Ed.), Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: Applications and Services (EPCE 20130) (pp. 261–270). Springer. Conference held in Las Vegas, NV, USA.

65.

Thompson

(2022, December 1). Your creativity won’t save your job from AI. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/12/why-the-rise-of-ai-is-the-most-important-story-of-the-year/672308/

66.

Waytz

Heafner

Epley

(2014). The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 113–117.

67.

Waytz

Norton

M. I.

(2014). Botsourcing and outsourcing: Robot, British, Chinese, and German workers are for thinking—not feeling—jobs. Emotion, 14(2), 434.

68.

Złotowski

Yogeeswaran

Bartneck

(2017). Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 100, 48–54.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB