Does Maximizing Good Make People Look Bad?

Abstract

Despite the potential to significantly increase the impact of donations, people often fail to prioritize the cost-effectiveness of charities. This paper examines an explanation for why people may donate less effectively due to reputational concerns that favor empathizing with donation recipients rather than deliberating about the cost-effectiveness of charities. Across seven studies, we find that “deliberators” are perceived as less moral and less desirable as social partners than “empathizers.” Moreover, people accurately anticipate the reputational costs of deliberation and are more likely to donate to causes that evoke more empathy but are less cost-effective when reputational concerns are highlighted. Our findings suggest that there are disincentives for selecting charities by deliberating about their cost-effectiveness, as people are more rewarded for signaling socially valued moral traits than for prioritizing charitable impact.

Keywords

morality helping/pro-social behavior social judgment empathy altruism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barasch

Levine

E. E.

Berman

J. Z.

Small

D. A.

(2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393–413.

Barclay

(2015). Reputation. In Buss

D. M.

(Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 1–19). Wiley.

Baron

Szymanska

(2011). Heuristics and biases in charity. In Oppenheimer

D. M.

Olivola

C. Y.

(Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 215–235). Psychology Press.

Berger

Penna

R. M.

(2013, November 25). The elitist philanthropy of so-called effective altruism. Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_elitist_philanthropy_of_so_called_effective_altruism

Berman

J. Z.

Barasch

Levine

E. E.

Small

D. A.

(2018). Impediments to effective altruism: The role of subjective preferences in charitable giving. Psychological Science, 29(5), 834–844.

Bloom

(2017). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 24–31.

Brambilla

Rusconi

Sacchi

Cherubini

(2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 135–143.

Bullock

J. G.

Green

D. P.

S. E.

(2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558.

Burum

Nowak

M. A.

Hoffman

(2020). An evolutionary explanation for ineffective altruism. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1245–1257.

10.

Caviola

Schubert

Greene

J. D.

(2021). The psychology of (in)effective altruism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(7), 596–607.

11.

Caviola

Schubert

Nemirow

(2020). The many obstacles to effective giving. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(2), 159.

12.

Caviola

Schubert

Teperman

Moss

Greenberg

Faber

(2020). Donors vastly underestimate differences in charities’ effectiveness. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(2), 159–172.

13.

Chapman

L. M.

Valenzuela

Vohs

K. D.

(2024). More than just your name: Public donations drive inferences of egoistic and altruistic motives. Psychology & Marketing, 41(8), 1854–1867.

14.

Critcher

C. R.

Inbar

Pizarro

D. A.

(2013). How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 308–315.

15.

Eisenberg

Miller

P. A.

(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91–119.

16.

Everett

J. A. C.

Faber

N. S.

Savulescu

Crockett

M. J.

(2018). The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 200–216.

17.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83.

18.

Frank

R. H.

(1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. W W Norton & Co.

19.

Giving USA 2020 . (2020, June 16). Giving USA. https://givingusa.org/giving-usa-2020-charitable-giving-showed-solid-growth-climbing-to-449-64-billion-in-2019-one-of-the-highest-years-for-giving-on-record/

20.

Helion

Pizarro

D. A.

(2015). Beyond dual-processes: The interplay of reason and emotion in moral judgment. In Clausen

Levy

(Eds.), Handbook of neuroethics (pp. 109–125). Springer.

21.

Hoffman

Yoeli

Nowak

M. A.

(2015). Cooperate without looking: why we care what people think and not just what they do. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(6), 1727–1732.

22.

Inbar

Cone

Gilovich

(2010). People’s intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 232–247.

23.

Jaeger

van Vugt

(2022). Psychological barriers to effective altruism: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 130–134.

24.

Jellison

J. M.

Green

(1981). A self-presentation approach to the fundamental attribution error: The norm of internality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(4), 643–649.

25.

Johnson

(2018). Dimensions of altruism: Do evaluations of prosocial behavior track social good or personal sacrifice? https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3277444

26.

Jordan

J. J.

Hoffman

Nowak

M. A.

Rand

D. G.

(2016). Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8658–8663.

27.

Law

K. F.

Campbell

Gaesser

(2022). Biased benevolence: The perceived morality of effective altruism across social distance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 426–444.

28.

Levine

E. E.

Barasch

Rand

Berman

J. Z.

Small

D. A.

(2018). Signaling emotion and reason in cooperation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(5), 702–719.

29.

Loewenstein

O’Donoghue

Bhatia

(2015). Modeling the interplay between affect and deliberation. Decisions, 2(2), 55–81.

30.

MacAskill

(2015). Doing good better: How effective altruism can help you make a difference. Gotham Books.

31.

MacAskill

(2019). The definition of effective altruism. In Greaves

Pummer

(Eds.), Effective altruism: Philosophical issues (pp. 1–10). Oxford University Press.

32.

McAuliffe

W. H. B.

Carter

E. C.

Berhane

Snihur

A. C.

McCullough

M. E.

(2020). Is Empathy the default response to suffering? A meta-analytic evaluation of perspective taking’s effect on empathic concern. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(2), 141–162.

33.

McManus

R. M.

Kleiman-Weiner

Young

(2020). What we owe to family: The impact of special obligations on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 31(3), 227–242.

34.

Metzger

Günther

(2019). Making an impact? The relevance of information on aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment. Journal of Development Economics, 136, 18–33.

35.

Montealegre

Bush

L. S.

Moss

Pizarro

(2023). Public vs. private donations: The influence of social visibility on choices between empathetic and cost-effective causes. Manuscript in preparation.

36.

Nemirow

J. A.

(2022). The sacrifice halo: Do we esteem altruists for the sacrifices they make or the benefits they deliver? [Doctoral Dissertation]. Harvard University.

37.

Oktar

Lombrozo

(2022). Deciding to be authentic: Intuition is favored over deliberation when authenticity matters. Cognition, 223, 105021.

38.

Simler

Hanson

(2017). The elephant in the brain: Hidden motives in everyday life. Oxford University Press.

39.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2012). A 21 Word Solution. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588

40.

Simonsohn

(2015, April 23). [36] How to study discrimination (or anything) with names; if you must. Data Colada. http://datacolada.org/36

41.

Singer

(2013, March). The why and how of effective altruism. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/peter_singer_the_why_and_how_of_effective_altruism

42.

Small

D. A.

Loewenstein

Slovic

(2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143–153.

43.

Sperber

Baumard

(2012). Moral reputation: An evolutionary and cognitive perspective. Mind & Language, 27(5), 495–518.

44.

Tetlock

Kristel

O. V.

Elson

Green

Lerner

Bassett

Szteiter

Berkowitz

(2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870.

45.

Uhlmann

E. L.

Pizarro

D. A.

Diermeier

(2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.

46.

Uhlmann

E. L.

Zhu

L. L.

Tannenbaum

(2013). When it takes a bad person to do the right thing. Cognition, 126(2), 326–334.

47.

Wojciszke

Bazinska

Jaworski

(1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1251–1263.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.46 MB