What’s in It for Me? Beliefs About Relative Costs to Well-Being Explain Why People Deprioritize Moral Improvements

Abstract

Most people are interested in improving themselves, but they show less interest in improving on moral traits. Why don’t people particularly want to be more moral, and why do people prioritize improving certain traits more than others? Across four preregistered studies of U.K.-based CloudResearch (N_{Study 1} = 252; N_Supplemental = 110) and Behavioral Research Lab (N_{Study 2a} = 303, N_{Study 2b} = 301) participants, we test four classes of explanations. Results rule out explanations based on the ideas that moral traits are seen as more difficult to change and as either more or less causally central. Instead, people are less interested in moral improvements because they believe (a) that they are already highly moral and (b) that nonmoral improvements would more effectively improve their happiness and goal attainment. These results clarify the perceived tradeoffs between well-being and morality and show that personal well-being is a central motivation for personality change.

Keywords

morality well-being personality change self-improvement goals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aquino

Reed

(2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423

Baranski

Gardiner

Lee

Funder

D. C.

(2021). Who in the world is trying to change their personality traits? Volitional personality change among college students in six continents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 1140–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000389

Barasch

Levine

E. E.

Berman

J. Z.

Small

D. A.

(2014). Selfish or selfless? On the signal value of emotion in altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037207

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Baumeister

R. F.

Exline

J. J.

(1999). Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1165–1194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00086

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

Aaker

J. L.

Garbinsky

E. N.

(2013). Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830764

Bench

S. W.

Schlegel

R. J.

Davis

W. E.

Vess

(2015). Thinking about change in the self and others: The role of self-discovery metaphors and the true self. Social Cognition, 33(3), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.3.2

Bigman

Y. E.

Tamir

(2016). The road to heaven is paved with effort: Perceived effort amplifies moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(12), 1654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000230

Brambilla

Sacchi

Rusconi

Goodwin

G. P.

(2021). The primacy of morality in impression development: Theory, research, and future directions. In Gawronski

(Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 187–262). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001

10.

Chen

S. Y.

Urminsky

Bartels

D. M.

(2016). Beliefs about the causal structure of the self-concept determine which changes disrupt personal identity. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616656800

11.

Choi

Catapano

Choi

(2017). Taking stock of happiness and meaning in everyday life: An experience sampling approach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616678455

12.

De Freitas

Cikara

Grossmann

Schlegel

(2018). Moral goodness is the essence of personal identity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(9), 739–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.006

13.

DeYoung

C. G.

Quilty

L. C.

Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880

14.

DeYoung

C. G.

Tiberius

(2023). Value fulfillment from a cybernetic perspective: A new psychological theory of well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221083777

15.

Dwyer

R. J.

Dunn

E. W.

Hershfield

H. E.

(2017). Cousins or conjoined twins: How different are meaning and happiness in everyday life? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2(2–3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1376580

16.

Effron

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(2015). Do as I say, not as I’ve done: Suffering for a misdeed reduces the hypocrisy of advising others against it. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.004

17.

Epley

Dunning

(2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.861

18.

Erlandsson

Wingren

Andersson

P. A.

(2020). Type and amount of help as predictors for impression of helpers. PLoS One, 15(12), e0243808. https://doi.org/10.0.5.91/journal.pone.0243808

19.

Furr

R. M.

Prentice

Hawkins

Parham A.

Jayawickreme

(2022). Development and validation of the Moral Character Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 98, Article 104228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104228

20.

Gai

P. J.

Bhattacharjee

(2022). Willpower as moral ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1999–2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001169

21.

Gander

Wagner

(2024). Which positive personality traits do people want to change?. European Journal of Personality, 38(4), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231211957

22.

Goldberg

L. R.

Johnson

J. A.

Eber

H. W.

Hogan

Ashton

M. C.

Cloninger

C. R.

Gough

H. G.

(2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007

23.

Goodwin

G. P.

Piazza

Rozin

(2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034726

24.

Gray

Wegner

D. M.

(2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013748

25.

Hartley

A. G.

Furr

R. M.

Helzer

E. G.

Jayawickreme

Velasquez

K. R.

Fleeson

(2016). Morality’s centrality to liking, respecting, and understanding others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616655359

26.

Heintzelman

S. J.

King

L. A.

(2019). Routines and meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(5), 688–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218795133

27.

Hofmann

Meindl

Mooijman

Graham

(2018). Morality and self-control: How they are intertwined and where they differ. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(4), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418759317

28.

Hofmann

Wisneski

D. C.

Brandt

M. J.

Skitka

L. J.

(2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345(6202), 1340–1343. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251560

29.

Huang

Yang

(2022). Self-transcendence or self-enhancement: People’s perceptions of meaning and happiness in relation to the self. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001297

30.

Hudson

N. W.

Fraley

R. C.

(2016). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216637840

31.

Hudson

N. W.

Roberts

B. W.

(2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008

32.

Landy

J. F.

Piazza

Goodwin

G. P.

(2016). When it’s bad to be friendly and smart: The desirability of sociability and competence depends on morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1272–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216655984

33.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

34.

Marsh

H. W.

Huppert

F. A.

Donald

J. N.

Horwood

M. S.

Sahdra

B. K.

(2020). The well-being profile (WB-Pro): Creating a theoretically based multidimensional measure of well-being to advance theory, research, policy, and practice. Psychological Assessment, 32, 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000787

35.

Molouki

Bartels

D. M.

(2017). Personal change and the continuity of the self. Cognitive Psychology, 93, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.11.006

36.

Monin

Jordan

A. H.

(2009). The dynamic moral self: A social psychological perspective. In Narvaez

(Ed.), Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 341–354). Cambridge University Press.

37.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

38.

O’Connor

Effron

D. A.

Lucas

B. J.

(2020). Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(3), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000195

39.

Oishi

Westgate

E. C.

(2022). A psychologically rich life: Beyond happiness and meaning. Psychological Review, 129, 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000317

40.

Olivola

C. Y.

Shafir

(2013). The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.767

41.

Peterson

Seligman

M. E.

(2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford University Press.

42.

Prinzing

De Freitas

Fredrickson

B. L.

(2022). The ordinary concept of a meaningful life: The role of subjective and objective factors in third-person attributions of meaning. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17(5), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2021.1897866

43.

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

44.

Ryff

C. D.

(1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

45.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2012). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Simon and Schuster.

46.

Soto

C. J.

John

O. P.

(2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096

47.

Strohminger

Knobe

Newman

(2017). The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(4), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689495

48.

Strohminger

Nichols

(2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131(1), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.005

49.

Sun

Goodwin

G. P.

(2020). Do people want to be more moral? Psychological Science, 31(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619893078

50.

Sun

Wilt

Meindl

Watkins

Goodwin

G. P.

(2024). How and why people want to be more moral. Journal of Personality, 92(3), 907–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12812

51.

Tangney

J. P.

Baumeister

R. F.

Boone

A. L.

(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324.

52.

Tappin

B. M.

McKay

R. T.

(2017). The illusion of moral superiority. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616673878

53.

Thielmann

de Vries

R. E.

(2021). Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121, 1112–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000304

54.

Wolf

(1997). Happiness and meaning: Two aspects of the good life. Social Philosophy and Policy, 14(1), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001734

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

5.89 MB