Understanding the Persistence of Traditional Values in Modern Society: Adaptive Utility Matters

Abstract

The adaptation account suggests that the persistence of some traditional values in modern society is due to their enduring adaptive utility. We tested this hypothesis by examining the change of filial piety in two Confucian societies, China and Japan. By analyzing natural language data, Study 1 found that Chinese people’s concern about and liking for filial piety have increased since 1979, with falling birth rate and rising elderly population as the Granger causes. By analyzing survey data from 2006 to 2017 (N = 7,283) in China, Study 2 found that reciprocal filial piety was adaptive (i.e., conducive to well-being) and increasing, whereas authoritarian filial piety was maladaptive (i.e., detrimental to well-being) and decreasing. By analyzing both Japanese language data from 1989 to 2023 (Study 3a) and survey data from 2006 to 2018 (Study 3b: N = 4,763), Study 3 replicated the main findings from China. These findings support the adaptation account of cultural persistence.

Keywords

filial piety cultural persistence adaptation account cultural change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bao

H. W.

Cai

Huang

(2022). Discerning cultural shifts in China? Commentary on Hamamura et al. (2021). American Psychologist, 77(6), 786–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001013

Bedford

Yeh

K. H.

(2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00100

Bianchi

E. C.

(2016). American individualism rises and falls with the economy: Cross-temporal evidence that individualism declines when the economy falters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000114

Cai

H. J.

Huang

Jing

(2019). Living in a changing world: The change of culture and psychology. In Matsumoto

Hwang

H. C.

(Eds.), The handbook of culture and psychology (2nd ed., pp. 786–817). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190679743.003.0023

Cai

H. J.

Huang

Z. H.

Lin

Zhang

M. Y.

Wang

X. O.

Zhu

H. J.

Xie

Yang

Jing

Y. M.

(2020). The psychological change of the Chinese people over the past half century: A literature review. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(10), 1599–1688. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01599

Cao

W. C.

Yeh

K. H.

(2014). The intergenerational relationship under population Aging: Analysis on the changes in filial piety in Taiwan society from 1994 to 2011. Sociological Studies, 29(2), 116–144. https://doi.org/10.19934/j.cnki.shxyj.2014.02.006

Chen

W. W.

(2014). The relationship between perceived parenting style, filial piety, and life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(3), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036819

Chen

Cen

(2005). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76(1), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00838.x

Cobb

C. L.

Schwartz

S. J.

Martinez

C. R.

Jr. (2025). A theory of cultural continuity: Heritage culture retention as an important psychological motivation. Psychological Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000561

10.

Cohen

(2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.451

11.

Cohen

Nisbett

R. E.

(1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205012

12.

DataBank. (2020). World Development Indicators [Dataset]. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

13.

Dong

Chang

E. S.

Wong

Simon

(2012). A qualitative study of filial piety among community dwelling, Chinese, older adults: Changing meaning and impact on health and well-being. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 10(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2012.673393

14.

Fischer

Milfont

T. L.

Gouveia

V. V.

(2011). Does social context affect value structures? Testing the within-country stability of value structures with a functional theory of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110396888

15.

Y. Y.

Chui

E. W. T.

(2020). Development and validation of a filial piety scale for Chinese elders in contemporary China. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 90(2), 176–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415018812399

16.

Garg

Schiebinger

Jurafsky

Zou

(2018). Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(16), E3635–E3644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720347115

17.

X. Y.

(2021). Multidimensional psychology of filial piety (Xiao): Differences in orientation and changes from ancient to modern times. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(3), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.00306

18.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791

19.

Greenfield

P. M.

(2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014726

20.

Greenfield

P. M.

(2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1722–1731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613479387

21.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E.

(2015). Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychological Science, 26(3), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614563765

22.

Hamamura

(2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism–collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411587

23.

Hashimoto

Ikels

(2005). Filial piety in changing Asian societies. In Johnson

M. L.

(Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of age and ageing (pp. 437–442). Cambridge University Press.

24.

Hsu

F. L.

(1971). Filial piety in Japan and China: Borrowing, variation and significance. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.2.1.67

25.

Hwang

C. H.

(1977). Filial piety from the psychological point of view. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 10, 11–20.

26.

Inglehart

Baker

W. E.

(2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288

27.

Inglehart

Welzel

(2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge university press.

28.

Jackson

J. C.

Gelfand

Fox

(2019). The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity–order trade-off. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0516-z

29.

Jackson

J. C.

Halberstadt

Takezawa

Liew

Smith

Apicella

Gray

(2023). Generalized morality culturally evolves as an adaptive heuristic in large social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(6), 1207–1238. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000358

30.

Jen

C. H.

Chen

W. W.

C. W.

(2019). Flexible mindset in the family: Filial piety, cognitive flexibility, and general mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1715–1730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518770912

31.

Krings

M. F.

van Wijngaarden

J. D.

Yuan

Huijsman

(2022). China’s elder care policies 1994–2020: A narrative document analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106141

32.

Leung

A. N. M.

Wong

S. S. F.

Wong

I. W. Y.

McBride-Chang

(2010). Filial piety and psychosocial adjustment in Hong Kong Chinese early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(5), 651–667. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609341046

33.

W. W.

Miller

D. J.

Rouen

Yang

(2021). Mental health of Chinese people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with infection severity of region of residence and filial piety. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 633452. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633452

34.

Liu

Dong

(2020). Psychological well-being of Chinese Immigrant adult-child caregivers: How do filial expectation, self-rated filial performance, and filial discrepancy matter? Aging & Mental Health, 24(3), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1544210

35.

Loulanski

(2006). Revising the concept for cultural heritage: The argument for a functional approach. International Journal of Cultural Property, 13(2), 207–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739106060085

36.

C. X.

Jiang

Fang

(2019). Filial piety and psychological mechanism from the perspective of positive psychology. Psychological Exploration, 39(02), 146–150.

37.

Treiman

D. J.

(2008). The effect of sibship size on educational attainment in China: Period variations. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300506

38.

Lum

T. Y.

Yan

E. C.

A. H.

Shum

M. H.

Wong

G. H.

Lau

M. M.

Wang

(2016). Measuring filial piety in the 21st century: Development, factor structure, and reliability of the 10-item contemporary filial piety scale. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(11), 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815570664

39.

Mehta

K. K.

(2004). Filial piety revisited in the context of modernizing Asian societies. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 4, S77–S78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2004.00157.x

40.

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2023). Vital statistics of Japan final data summary. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/en/stat-search/files?stat_infid=000040136281

41.

Moore

W. E.

(1966). Global sociology: The world as a singular system. American Journal of Sociology, 71(5), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/224165

42.

National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2021). China statistical yearbook 2021. https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2021/indexeh.htm

43.

Ogihara

(2018). Economic shifts and cultural changes in individualism: A cross-temporal perspective. In Uskul

Oishi

(Eds.), Socioeconomic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives (pp. 247–270). Oxford University Press.

44.

R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

45.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

46.

Santos

H. C.

Varnum

M. E.

Grossmann

(2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700622

47.

Shojaie

Fox

E. B.

(2022). Granger causality: A review and recent advances. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 9(1), 289–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-040120-010930

48.

Thomas

(1990). Filial piety, social change and Singapore youth. Journal of Moral Education, 19(3), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724900190305

49.

Twenge

J. M.

Campbell

W. K.

Gentile

(2013). Changes in pronoun use in American books and the rise of individualism, 1960-2008. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(3), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112455100

50.

Varnum

M. E.

Grossmann

(2017). Cultural change: The how and the why. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699971

51.

Wang

Y. N.

Zhou

L. M.

Luo

Y. J.

(2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(8), 608–612.

52.

(2022). Trends of filial piety norms and children’s support in China. Journal of Social Development, 1, 176–195.

53.

Yang

K. S.

Bond

M. H.

(1996). The psychological transformation of the Chinese people as a result of societal modernization. In Bond

M. H.

(Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479–498). Oxford University Press.

54.

Yang

(2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300202

55.

Yang

Land

K. C.

(2013). Age-period-cohort analysis: New models, methods, and empirical applications. Taylor & Francis.

56.

Yeh

K. H.

Bedford

(2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839X.2003.00122.x

57.

Yeh

K. H.

C. C.

Tsao

W. C.

Wan

P. S.

(2013). Filial piety in contemporary Chinese societies: A comparative study of Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. International Sociology, 28(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580913484345

58.

Peng

Tang

Chen

C. S.

Qian

Sun

Han

Chai

(2016). Cultural value shifting in pronoun use. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(2), 310–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115619230

59.

Yuan

J. L.

Liu

(2022). The concept of filial piety, inter-generational support and the change of youth group support behavior: 2006-2017. China Youth Study, 34(01), 93–103.

60.

Zhan

H. J.

(2002). Chinese caregiving burden and the future burden of elder care in life-course perspective. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 54(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.2190/GYRF-84VC-JKCK-W0MU

61.

Zhang

Weng

(2019). Not all cultural values are created equal: Cultural change in China reexamined through Google books. International Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12436

62.

Zhao

Adams

Esiaka

(2023). Reverence and reciprocity in prioritization of care to a parent: The role of cultural ecologies and implications for decolonizing relationality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 51(8), 1374–1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231218341

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB