One Country,One People? Racial Ethnic Minorities in the United States Perceive Their Community Norms Stronger Than European Americans

Abstract

The United States is characterized as having relatively weak social norms compared to other countries. However, this characterization may be an oversimplification due to the cultural diversity that exists within the country. Four studies (N = 1,537) examined whether and why U.S. racial minorities (East Asian, Latinx, and African Americans) perceive their racial community’s norms to be significantly stronger than European Americans and White immigrants to the United States (Studies 1–4). This difference was not due to increased perceived discrimination (Study 3) or concerns about out-group member punishment (Study 4). Instead, racial minorities’ stronger perceptions of community norms were motivated primarily by interdependence (Studies 1–4) and concerns about being punished by in-group members for not following norms (Study 4). These findings illustrate differences in norm strength between racial groups in a single country, deepening our understanding of how social norm perceptions may vary in a multicultural society.

Keywords

social norms interdependence tightness culture United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anoll

A. P.

(2022). The obligation mosaic: Race and social norms in US political participation. University of Chicago Press.

Baldwin

Mussweiler

(2018). The culture of social comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), E9067–E9074. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721555115

Berry

J. W.

(2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00231

Bicchieri

(2014). Norms, conventions, and the power of expectations. Oxford University Press.

Bond

Smith

P. B.

(1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111

Brown

A. K.

(2013). Cultural Perspective on African American Culture. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(2), 54–68.

Campos

Kim

H. S.

(2017). Incorporating the cultural diversity of family and close relationships into the study of health. American Psychologist, 72(6), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000122

Carpenter

(2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103

Chiu

C. Y.

Gelfand

M. J.

Yamagishi

Shteynberg

Wan

(2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 5(4), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375562

10.

Chua

R. Y. J.

Huang

K. G.

Jin

(2019). Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(14), 6720–6725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815723116

11.

Cohen

Kitayama

(2019). Handbook of cultural psychology. Guilford Publications.

12.

Dawson

M. C.

(1995). Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton University Press.

13.

de Mooij

Beniflah

(2017). Measuring cross-cultural differences of ethnic groups within nations: Convergence or divergence of cultural values? The case of the United States. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1227758

14.

Devos

Banaji

(2005). America = White? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.447

15.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715.

16.

Eom

Kim

H. S.

(2015). Intersubjective norms: Cultural and interpersonal perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1313–1316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115600262

17.

Ewuoso

Hall

(2019). Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 12(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2019.v12i2.679

18.

Findling

M. G.

Bleich

S. N.

Casey

L. S.

Blendon

R. J.

Benson

J. M.

Sayde

J. M.

Miller

(2019). Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of Latinos. Health Services Research, 54(S2), 1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13216

19.

Gelfand

M. J.

Nishii

L. H.

Raver

J. L.

(2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225

20.

Gelfand

M. J.

Raver

J. L.

Nishii

Leslie

L. M.

Lun

Lim

B. C.

Duan

Almaliach

Ang

Arnadottir

Aycan

Boehnke

Boski

Cabecinhas

Chan

Chhokar

D’Amato

Ferrer

Fischlmayr

I. C.

. . . Yamaguchi

(2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754

21.

Golash-Boza

Darity

(2008). Latino racial choices: The effects of skin colour and discrimination on Latinos’ and Latinas’ racial self-identifications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(5), 899–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701568858

22.

Gross

Vostroknutov

(2022). Why do people follow social norms? Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.016

23.

Haberstroh

Oyserman

Schwarz

Kühnen

L. J.

(2002). Is the interdependent self more sensitive to question context than the independent self? Self-construal and the observation of conversational norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1513

24.

Harrington

J. R.

Gelfand

M. J.

(2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(22), 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111

25.

HDPulse. (2023). Residential segregation (Black/White) by State. National Institute of Minority Health and Health Disparities. https://hdpulse.nimhd.nih.gov/data-portal/physical/table?age=001&age_options=ageall_1&demo=01005&demo_options=res_seg_2&physicaltopic=100&physicaltopic_options=physical_2&race=00&race_options=raceall_1&sex=0&sex_options=sexboth_1&statefips=00&statefips_options=area_states

26.

Heine

S. J.

Lehman

D. R.

Peng

Greenholtz

(2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.903

27.

A. K.

Roberts

S. O.

Gelman

S. A.

(2015). Essentialism and racial bias jointly contribute to the categorization of multiracial individuals. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1639–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615596436

28.

Jackson

J. C.

Gelfand

Ember

C. R.

(2020). A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1930), Article 20201036. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1036

29.

Jolly

P. M.

Hoof

H. V.

Chen

Kim

Duran

M. E.

Navas

A. C.

Valle

J. G.

Pérez

G. M.

(2021). Quantifying cultural tightness-looseness in Ecuador. PLoS One, 16(1), Article e0246064. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246064

30.

Khumalo

I. P.

Wilson-Fadiji

Brouwers

S. A.

(2020). Well-being orientations and time perspective across cultural tightness–Looseness latent classes in Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1681–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00151-5

31.

Kitayama

(2002). Culture and basic psychological processes—Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89

32.

Kitayama

Salvador

C. E.

(2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707317

33.

Kitayama

Salvador

C. E.

(2024). Cultural psychology: Beyond East and West. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-021723-063333

34.

Kitayama

Salvador

C. E.

Nanakdewa

Rossmaier

San Martin

Savani

(2022). Varieties of interdependence and the emergence of the Modern West: Toward the globalizing of psychology. American Psychologist, 77(9), 991–1006. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001073

35.

Knowles

E. D.

Lowery

B. S.

Chow

R. M.

Unzueta

M. M.

(2014). Deny, distance, or dismantle? How White Americans manage a privileged identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614554658

36.

Komarraju

Cokley

K. O.

(2008). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: A comparison of African Americans and European Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.336

37.

Lee

R. T.

Perez

A. D.

Boykin

C. M.

Mendoza-Denton

(2019). On the prevalence of racial discrimination in the United States. PLoS One, 14(1), Article e0210698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210698

38.

H. Z.

Zhang

Bhatt

Yum

Y. O.

(2006). Rethinking culture and self-construal: China as a Middle Land. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(5), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.146.5.591-610

39.

Lopez

Devos

Somo

(2022). State-level cultural tightness–looseness accounts for implicit associations between American and White identities. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, Article 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100033

40.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.

41.

Kitayama

Han

Gelfand

M. J.

(2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112

42.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E. W.

Kitayama

Gonzalez

Nisbett

R. E.

(2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(14), 6192–6197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107

43.

Nakano

D. Y.

(2013). An interlocking panethnicity: The negotiation of multiple identities among Asian American social movement leaders. Sociological Perspectives, 56(4), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2013.56.4.569

44.

Nezlek

J. B.

Kafetsios

Smith

C. V.

(2008). Emotions in everyday social encounters: Correspondence between culture and self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108318114

45.

Olaniyan

(2017). African-American critical discourse and the invention of cultural identities. African American Review, 50(4), 877–889.

46.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

47.

Park

Kitayama

(2014). Interdependent selves show face-induced facilitation of error processing: Cultural neuroscience of self-threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(2), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss125

48.

Pratto

Çidam

Stewart

A. L.

Zeineddine

F. B.

Aranda

Aiello

Chryssochoou

Cichocka

Cohrs

J. C.

Durrheim

Eicher

Foels

Górska

Lee

I.-C.

Licata

Liu

J. H.

Meyer

Morselli

. . . Henkel

K. E.

(2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 Languages and 20 Countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612473663

49.

Rotzinger

J. S.

Jensen

L. A.

Thalmayer

A. G.

(2025). Ubuntu in Namibia and Kenya: How emerging adults live an essential African value today. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 56(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221241309863

50.

Salvador

C. E.

Idrovo Carlier

Ishii

Torres Castillo

Nanakdewa

Canale Segovia

San Martin

Savani

Kitayama

(2025). Self-enhancement in Latin America: Is it linked to interdependence? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 00(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241309387

51.

Salvador

C. E.

Idrovo Carlier

Ishii

Torres Castillo

Nanakdewa

San Martin

Savani

Kitayama

(2024). Emotionally expressive interdependence in Latin America: Triangulating through a comparison of three cultural zones. Emotion, 24(3), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001302

52.

Salvador

C. E.

Kraus

B. T.

Ackerman

J. M.

Gelfand

M. J.

Kitayama

(2020). Interdependent self-construal predicts reduced sensitivity to norms under pathogen threat: An electrocortical investigation. Biological Psychology, 157, Article 107970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107970

53.

Sidanius

Pratto

(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

54.

Smith

C. W.

Lopez Bunyasi

Smith

J. C.

(2019). Linked fate over time and across generations. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 684–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1638801

55.

Smith

P. B.

Fischer

(2008). Acquiescence, extreme response bias and culture: A multilevel analysis. In van

F. J. R.

Vijver de van Hemert

D. A.

Poortinga

Y. H.

(Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 285–314). Psychology Press.

56.

Stepick

C. D.

(2002). Becoming American, constructing ethnicity: Immigrant youth and civic engagement. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_12

57.

Thomson

Yuki

Talhelm

Schug

Kito

Ayanian

A. H.

Becker

J. C.

Becker

Chiu

Choi

H.-S.

Ferreira

C. M.

Fülöp

Gul

Houghton-Illera

A. M.

Joasoo

Jong

Kavanagh

C. M.

Khutkyy

Manzi

. . . Visserman

M. L.

(2018). Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(29), 7521–7526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713191115

58.

Tomasello

Melis

A. P.

Tennie

Wyman

Herrmann

(2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation: The interdependence hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 53(6), 673–692. https://doi.org/10.1086/668207

59.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118

60.

Uugwanga

S. N.

Naudé

Thalmayer

A. G.

(2025). Becoming an Ovambo adult: Growing into agentic communalism in Sub-Saharan Africa. Psychological Science, 36(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976241311920

61.

Vargas

J. H.

Kemmelmeier

(2013). Ethnicity and contemporary American culture: A meta-analytic investigation of horizontal–vertical individualism–collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022112443733

62.

Weaving

Gelfand

M. J.

(2024). Majority rule: Do minorities live in “tighter” social worlds? Current Opinion in Psychology, 60, Article 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101885

63.

Weigel

R. H.

Vernon

D. T. A.

Tognacci

L. N.

(1974). Specificity of the attitude as a determinant of attitude-behavior congruence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(6), 724–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037540

64.

White

I. K.

Laird

C. N.

(2020). Steadfast democrats: How social forces shape Black political behavior. In Steadfast Democrats. Princeton University Press.

65.

Williams

D. R.

Jackson

J. S.

Anderson

N. B.

(1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socioeconomic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 335–351.

66.

Zou

L. X.

Cheryan

(2017). Two axes of subordination: A new model of racial position. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000080

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.90 MB